Follow Us:
Thursday, August 18, 2022

At GST Council meeting today, states to demand compensation regime extension

There was a consensus among the states on Tuesday on rate rationalisation, which includes correcting inverted duty structures and expanding the tax base.

Written by Aanchal Magazine | New Delhi |
June 29, 2022 3:47:53 pm
gst council meetingFinance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman chairs the GST Council meeting, in Chandigarh, Tuesday, June 28, 2022. (PTI File Photo/ Representational)

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council is meeting for the second day of its 47th meeting on Wednesday for discussions on the contentious issue of the extension of the compensation mechanism for states beyond the five-year period ending this month.

While there was a consensus among the states on Tuesday on rate rationalisation, which includes correcting inverted duty structures and expanding the tax base, the second day is set to see states raising demands for extending the compensation regime and a uniform rate of 28 per cent for casinos, online gaming and horse racing.

As per the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, the states were guaranteed compensation at the compounded rate of 14 per cent from the base year 2015-16 for losses arising because of the implementation of the taxation regime for five years since its rollout. The compensation regime will end in June.

Demand for extension of compensation

Subscriber Only Stories
Delhi Confidential: Kerala football club stuck in Tashkent, S-G Tushar Me...Premium
Explained: The ‘developed country’ goalPremium
An Expert Explains: Why a stable Kenya is in the interest of Africa &...Premium
With fund & engineers, Taliban help rebuild gurdwara hit by Islamic S...Premium

States and Union Territories such as Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh and Delhi have asked for an extension of the compensation regime. Some Opposition-ruled states have also suggested tweaking the revenue sharing formula under the indirect tax regime.

“The consequences of inflation, the cracking down on states’ borrowing and states’ spending by the Union, the thing to do with conscience is to extend compensation. I have said it before 3-4 times, will say it again, the consequences for states should the compensation not be extended would be so negative, so devastating in some cases that I don’t think that the Union government would want it on its conscience. If they have a conscience, or at least if they are in politics, elections are coming, I assume they will not want these negative consequences. Second thing is that if it is truly a federal structure, then the GST Council should be the one to make the opinion rather than the Union government by itself,” Tamil Nadu Finance Minister Palanivel Thiagarajan told reporters before the meeting on Wednesday.

Uttarakhand Finance Minister Prem Chand Aggarwal said the state would demand an extension for the compensation regime. “Being a new state, we have limited sources of revenue. We will demand an extension of the compensation scheme or some other way to compensate for the revenue loss. We will have an annual loss of about Rs 5,000 crore,” he said.

Kerala Finance Minister K N Balagopal said, “We are looking to ask for an extension for the compensation mechanism for five years beyond June. Discussion will happen.”


Chhattisgarh Finance Minister TS Singh Deo, in a letter to Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, said that if the protective revenue provision is not continued, then the 50:50 formula for the central GST and state GST should be tweaked, with the share of states at 70-80 per cent and CGST at 20-30 per cent.

“We are presenting the proposal in the GST Council to continue with the 14 per cent protected revenue provision. If the protective revenue provision is not continued, the 50 per cent formula for CGST and SGST should be changed to SGST 80 -70 per cent and CGST 20-30 per cent,” Deo, who did not attend the meeting due to Covid infection, said.

Revenue growth figures

As per data on revenue growth collated for the meeting, the all-India average shortfall between the protected revenue and the post-settlement gross SGST revenue was 27.2 per cent in 2021-22 as against 37.9 per cent in 2020-21. In 2021-22, only five out of 31 states and Union Territories — Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim — registered a revenue growth higher than the protected revenue rate for states under GST. Puducherry, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Chhattisgarh recorded the highest revenue gap between the protected revenue and post-settlement gross state GST revenue in 2021-22.


The states’ protected revenue grew at a slower rate than the guaranteed 14 per cent compounded growth in recent years and the Covid-19 pandemic further increased the gap between protected revenue and the actual revenue receipt, including a reduction in cess collection. In order to meet the resource gap of the states because of the short release of compensation, the Centre borrowed and released Rs 1.1 lakh crore in 2020-21 and Rs 1.59 lakh crore in 2021-22 as back-to-back loans to meet a part of the shortfall in cess collection.

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Business News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 29-06-2022 at 03:47:53 pm

Featured Stories