GDP back series was second best solution: Sudipto Mundle

Sudipto Mundle, told The Indian Express that the estimates were the “second best option” in the absence of comparable data for earlier years up to 1993-94.

Written by P Vaidyanathan Iyer | New Delhi | Updated: September 3, 2018 6:54:52 am
Spending surge powers growth: GDP is up 8.2%, best in over two years According to Mundle, this was perhaps the main reason why the Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) couldn’t do it, either, after adopting the base year of 2011-12 for evaluating GDP data from January 2015.

Days after the government dismissed the new back series GDP data as “not official”, the chairman of the committee on real sector statistics, Sudipto Mundle, told The Indian Express that the estimates were the “second best option” in the absence of comparable data for earlier years up to 1993-94.

In an interview, Mundle, Emeritus Professor and Member of the Board of Governors, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, said: “The new series GDP uses very rich data — audited balance sheets of lakhs of companies — available under MCA21. But there are certain disadvantages, too. For instance, you could not use this new data source backward, because it didn’t exist. You couldn’t go beyond a few years.”

Explained | Backstory of GDP back series and the controversy surrounding it

According to Mundle, this was perhaps the main reason why the Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) couldn’t do it, either, after adopting the base year of 2011-12 for evaluating GDP data from January 2015.

READ | Sudipto Mundle interview: ‘Nobody has questioned integrity or methodology of back series GDP data’

“They were struggling. For a few back years, they could use MCA21, then for a few more years, they could use a private source, CMIE, which has a limited database. You could not get back much beyond that,” he said.

OPINION | GDP Report – misreading the facts

The committee’s report produced new back series data, which showed that the Indian economy grew at a faster clip in two terms of the UPA, between 2004-05 and 2013-14, when compared with average growth recorded in the first four years (2014-15 to 2017-18) of the NDA-II government. In 2006-07, GDP at factor cost touched double digit growth rate at 10.08 per cent.

READ | As per new GDP measure, UPA decade growth revised up to 8.12%, hit 10% in 2006-07: NDA panel

Mundle’s committee submitted the report to the National Statistical Commission in July, which placed it on the Government website. But the findings of the report prompted the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation to issue a statement on August 19 that “the estimates in the report are not official estimates and are meant only to facilitate taking a decision on the appropriate approach”.

For all the latest Business News, download Indian Express App

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement