scorecardresearch
Tuesday, Jan 31, 2023
Advertisement
Premium

Madras High Court orders winding up of SpiceJet over outstanding dues

🔴 SpiceJet “has miserably failed to satisfy the three pronged test suggested by the Supreme Court in Mathusudan Govardhandas & Co Vs Madhu Woollen Industries, and hence had rendered itself liable to be wound up for its inability to pay its debts under Section 433 (e) of the Companies Act 1956,” the high court said in its order.

Spicejet aircraft. (Express archive photo)

The Madras High Court has ordered the winding up of SpiceJet and asked the official liquidator to take over the low-cost airline’s assets in a case related to non-payment of unpaid dues of around $24.01 million to Swiss stock corporation Credit Suisse AG.

While directing winding up of the carrier, Justice R Subramanian, however, kept his order in abeyance for three weeks, if SpiceJet deposits $5 million within two weeks. In a filing to stock exchanges on Tuesday, SpiceJet said it will soon initiate “appropriate remedial steps including preferring an appeal” against the order before a higher bench “within the time frame allowed by the Madras High Court.”

“The company believes it has a good case on merits and is hopeful of having favourable outcome in the appeal,” it said.

SpiceJet “has miserably failed to satisfy the three pronged test suggested by the Supreme Court in Mathusudan Govardhandas & Co Vs Madhu Woollen Industries, and hence had rendered itself liable to be wound up for its inability to pay its debts under Section 433 (e) of the Companies Act 1956,” the high court said in its order.

Subscriber Only Stories
Delhi Confidential: Attorney, always
Gender gap in undergraduate programmes widens, gains of last few years lo...
Budget signal from states for FM: Capital spending gets boost
In a remote mountain village in Tamil Nadu, doctors are just a click away

The Madras HC had rejected the airline’s stand that SR Technics did not have a valid licence to carry out aircraft maintenance services from the Director General of Civil Aviation as required under the Aircraft Act and, therefore, the enforcement of the claim would be against public policy. —FE

First published on: 07-12-2021 at 14:39 IST
Next Story

Bru migrants in Tripura try to feel at home in Kahamtaipara resettlement village

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close