August 05, 2022 11:33 pm
The court passed the order while hearing a petition filed by one Israr Ahmad and others seeking direction for quashing of the proceedings of sessions trial and chargesheet arising out of a case lodged against them at the Naseerabad police station in Rae Bareli on charges of rioting, criminal intimidation and the SC/ST Act.
January 20, 2022 10:08 am
🔴 A senior official said former Madras High Court judge Justice P R Sivakumar who was appointed as chairperson of the newly-constituted State Commission for SC/STs visited the village and took stock of the situation.
October 26, 2021 7:51 am
The SC bench said this while quashing a case against a resident of Madhya Pradesh, who was convicted for using casteist slurs against his neighbour — a Scheduled Caste woman — with whom he had a property dispute.
October 12, 2021 8:11 pm
The case dates back to November, 2016 when three members of a Dalit family were shot dead by Satender and Harish.
July 19, 2021 3:16 pm
A bench comprising justices L Nageswara Rao and Aniruddha Bose closed the criminal case against the lawmaker after holding that his speech did not fulfil the ingredients to attract the offenses for which he has been charged.
May 17, 2021 1:43 pm
Dalits had organised a temple festival in their colony and hosted music and dance events coinciding with the fete which violated Covid-19 lockdown protocol.
January 13, 2021 2:29 pm
The police also shared the data showing 39% cases filed for crimes against women were fake.
December 07, 2020 1:32 am
Aakash Jadhav, a resident of Santacruz, who worked as a delivery agent with a food-delivery company, was assaulted on November 2 near his residence by the four accused who were alleged to be in an inebriated state and got into an argument with him.
November 06, 2020 9:00 am
A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and Ajay Rastogi said that to constitute an offence under the Act, the words spoken must be “in any place within public view”, and not within the four walls of a house and in the absence of any member of the public.
August 28, 2020 3:33 am
Section 15A (5) of the Act, which states that a victim or his dependent “shall be entitled to be heard” at any proceeding under this Act, was also challenged. Hemal Jain submitted that these two provisions are directory in nature and not mandatory.