By amendment to rule 6.2.4, administrators were allowed to hold stakes in events like IPL.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on the fate of ousted BCCI chief N Srinivasan.
The court will resume hearing arguments on the petition by the Cricket Association of Bihar (CAB) on Wednesday.
BCCI counsel CA Sundaram opposed it raising the question of the board’s autonomy as a private society.
It also clarified that the new panel will be a “very high-power committee” which can address the issues relating to conflict of interest.
The apex court completely ruled out Srinivasan’s claim of no conflict of Interest.
Bench to decide on making the entire report public only at an appropriate stage.
Nalini Chidambaram, counsel for the CABihar, started her arguments by reading out certain portions from the first report.
SC’s hearing on IPL spot-fixing inquiry resumed on Monday following the report filed by Mudgal Committee.
Board members conclude there is ‘no taint on conduct of N Srinivasan; back Raman too.
Savant didn’t see any reason for the functioning of the BCCI to be affected by the adjournment of the AGM.
Srinivasan, Meiyappan were questioned by Justice Mukul Mudgal panel in relation to IPL-6 spot-fixing case.
SC allowed access of audio transcripts of statements made by Srinivasan and Dhoni before IPL probe panel.
Corruption charges termed ‘unverified’, independent probe sought.
S Sreesanth tweets on his personal handle, and states his wish to represent the country at the highest level again.