Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Newsletter | ePaper
Indian Express >  National Network >  Human Trafficking Scam > 

In 2004, passport case against Pathan, ‘aides’ had been quashed

Font Size
Mahesh Langa Posted: May 07, 2007 at 0054 hrs IST
Related Stories: Trafficking case: Another travel agent arrestedTrafficking: Police say Dhar forged papersPermanent House panel to keep eye on MPsTrafficking: Police grill two MPsHuman trafficking: Yet another TRS MLA surrenders
Ahmedabad, May 6: One of the most glaring holes in the Samirkhan Pathan encounter story is the police claim that he had obtained a fake passport in the name of one Nawab Khan from Bhopal and travelled to Pakistan on the same.

Based on his “confessions”, before he was killed in an encounter on October 22, 2002, the police had arrested 12 people and charged them with criminal conspiracy and with waging a war against the country.

When the case came up for trial in the Ahmedabad Sessions Court, the prosecution said that on January 13, 1999, Samirkhan travelled from Delhi to Lahore by Samjhauta Express. That while he obtained a tourist visa for a month, it was extended for 15 days.

The prosecution added that he joined a training camp in Pakistan, where he learnt to operate sophisticated weapons, and then went to Nepal. From there, they claimed, Samirkhan came to Patna, Mumbai and then Ahmedabad, where he was arrested.

However, when Passport Officer of Bhopal T D Sharma was called by the court for questioning, he submitted that the passport in the name of Nawab Khan had been issued in March 1999. That was two months after the prosecution’s date for Samirkhan’s visit to Pakistan.

Ads By Google
The court also pointed out that the prosecution had not been able to seize the fake passport, nor had it been able to verify if such a person had travelled to Pakistan on that particular day.

In its observations on the way police had handled the case, the court said: “The first two pages of the complaint are nothing but narration of an essay...” It noted that the prosecution had been unable to submit any evidence, direct or indirect, to suggest involvement of the 12 people arrested.

The entire case was created on the basis of the confession of Samirkhan, who was dead, and it seemed nothing but police “fancy”, the court added.

Finding no prima facie case against any of the accused for any offence, the court had discharged all 12.

This order was delivered by then Additional Sessions Judge B N Jani in January 2004. The same was confirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court subsequently.

Ads By Google
Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2009 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient(s) name *
*Recipient(s) e-mail address *
(Separate addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name(s) and e-mail address(es) you provide will
not be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient(s) of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close