Pratap Bhanu Mehta is President, Centre Policy Research, New Delhi, one of India's top think tanks. Before he started engaging with contemporary affairs, he taught political theory at Harvard, and briefly at JNU. He has written extensively on intellectual history, political theory, law, India's social transformation and world affairs. He is the recipient of the Infosys Prize, the Adisheshiah Prize and the Amartya Sen Prize. He has been singularly blessed with wonderful colleagues and is grateful that all the institutions he has been associated with, value their independence fiercely. He misses having students, since nothing better expresses the idea of a good life than a good seminar. He believes the purpose of writing is to provoke thinking not to provide instruction. Although politics and the contemporary world excites him, the high point of the day for him remains "retiring with the ancients," to use Machiavelli's phrase. There is nothing like retiring with old books, that have more of the world in them than we often recognize.
The authority of American democracy has taken a beating. Restoring faith will be a tough ask.
Her outing speaks about us: The idea that publicity could be a loss of freedom has become alien to us.
India’s government may want calibrated strategic escalation, but this genie will not be put back in easily.
Remember, this is a state where defeat led to even more militarisation and radicalisation; this is a state that is willing to bear the cost of great internal violence, so a little more experience of internal violence will hardly dent it
Arvind Kejriwal, Nitish Kumar, Rahul Gandhi, they all seem diminished.
Reconfigure triple talaq debate: It is about individual freedom and equality vs coercion and subordination
The issue is not taming politics with dharma. It is how to understand dharma differently.
Or insaniyat? Or jamhooriyat? In Kashmir, so-called solutions are riddled with contradictions and divisions
The truth in India’s new position is this: We have acknowledged that India, Pakistan are deeply hyphenated.
Institutionalisation of the GST regime has more than a touch of romance; it is also practically wise
Anti-corruption movement produced political churning, but left institutional issues unaddressed.
Gujarat unrest and misogyny against Mayawati show while Dalit lives have improved, conflict has increased
Will attacks, like the one in Nice, ultimately bridge serious differences between great powers?
How does one address words to Kashmir? What do you say in a political context where all texts are sub texts, all ends dead ends?
An attribute of this cabinet reshuffle is the recognition that politics is, first and foremost, about social mediation
India’s claim is not in doubt, but its NSG bid shows machismo more than maturity.
With Britain voting to leave the European Union, we are now entering a brave new world
One way of skirting them in the next polls is to bring trifurcation of the state on to the political agenda.
Liberalism needs to recover the noble lie that ideas are not politics by other means.
Islam is best explained by investigating its contradictions, instead of wishing them away
When government creates a credibility crisis for itself, premium on anyone who looks half-credible goes up.
Modi government’s backward-looking instincts keep pulling down its forward-looking mission.
Now in power in states like J&K and Assam, the BJP will be on test for its nation-building capacity
Our punitive impulses are an expression of deep institutional failure.
The lesson should not be to exult in a moral high ground, but to realise that the party is still tottering.
India comes across as trying to compete with China by being China. It’s not a winning strategy.
A new alignment of incentives and unrest is emerging . It could make reservations an important political axis
The role of the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army in the mainstream national movement and how their moral compass was rooted in non-violence.
On IPL, to accuse the court of a politics of distraction is to miss the point.
Angry populism against corrupt elites could grow. But in India, reaction will be muted.
Fundamental military alignments with US, taking place without open debate, may foreclose India’s options.
If this bill with far-reaching implications for rights, accountability and the powers of the state is a money bill, then practically any legislation can be converted into a money bill.
It was undergirded by a set of meta-assumptions, all of which are now being contested.
Budget confuses government’s rabid rightwing supporters more than it annoys its opponents.
Rather than being threatened by currents of world history, India can take any current of thought and make it its own, but in a way that exudes that ineffable sense of being shaped by India.
Nothing that JNU students did poses nearly as much of a threat to India as government's subversion of freedom