US military leaders said today that sexual assault in the ranks is “like a cancer” that could destroy the force,but they rejected far-reaching congressional efforts to strip commanders of some authority in meting out justice.
Seated side-by-side at a long witness table,Army Gen. Martin Dempsey,chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,and the head of each branch of the military testified on what is widely viewed as an epidemic of sexual assault plaguing the services.
Outraged by recent high-profile cases and overwhelming statistics,lawmakers have moved aggressively on legislation to address the scourge of sexual assault. They summoned the military brass to answer their questions at a jam-packed hearing.
Sen. Carl Levin,a Democrat and chairman of the Armed Services Committee,said the problem of sexual assault “is of such a scope and magnitude that it has become a stain on our military.”
Congress has acted in prior years to ensure the aggressive investigation and prosecution of sexual assaults,Levin said,but more needs to be done. The committee is considering seven bills to deal with sexual assault.
As important as additional protections would be,Levin said,the problem won’t be addressed successfully without a cultural change throughout the military. And that starts at the top of the chain of command.
“The military services are hierarchal organizations: The tone is set from the top of that chain,the message comes from the top,and accountability rests at the top,” said Levin,who has not endorsed any of the bills.
The military leaders offered no disagreement about the impact on the services.
“Sexual assault and harassment are like a cancer within the force,a cancer that left untreated will destroy the fabric of our force,” said Army Gen. Ray Odierno. “It’s imperative that we take a comprehensive approach to prevent attacks,to protect our people,and where appropriate,to prosecute wrongdoing and hold people accountable.”
While acknowledging the problem and accepting that legislation is inevitable,military leaders insisted that commanders keep their authority to handle sexual assault cases.
“Reducing command responsibility could adversely affect the ability of the commander to enforce professional standards and ultimately,to accomplish the mission,” Dempsey told the committee.