Advocates of Hong Kong independence are not qualified for office: Reports

Britain returned Hong Kong to Chinese control in 1997 under a "one country, two systems" formula that gave the territory wide-ranging autonomy, including judicial freedom.

By: Reuters | Shanghai | Published:November 5, 2016 3:59 pm
Hong Kong, Shanghai, China, Chinese Government, People's Daily, Chinese newspaper, Beijing, world news, indian express news Protesters rally outside the Hong Kong government headquarters, Friday, Aug. 5, 2016 as they demand Hong Kong Independence. Amid a dispute over candidates excluded on political grounds, Hong Kong’s government on Friday posted the names of those approved to run in the territory’s most contentious Legislative Council elections since reverting to Chinese rule almost two decades ago. The placard reads “Punish rioters severely, pay back in prison”.(AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

People who advocate Hong Kong independence are in violation of the territory’s laws and China’s constitution. The advocates are not qualified to stand for public office, the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s top newspaper said on Saturday. The comments in the People’s Daily came ahead of what is expected to effectively be a ruling by Beijing on the fate of two newly elected Hong Kong legislators, who pledged allegiance to the “Hong Kong nation” and displayed a “Hong Kong is not China” banner when they first attempted to take office in October. Britain returned Hong Kong to Chinese control in 1997 under a “one country, two systems” formula that gave the territory wide-ranging autonomy, including judicial freedom.

The oath-taking incident made waves in the former British colony, where the topic of independence from China was once regarded as taboo, but has percolated to the fore since months of pro-democracy protests in 2014 failed to secure any concessions from Beijing. In the coming days the leaders of the National People’s Congress, China’s legislature, will review a “draft explanation” of the section of Hong Kong’s mini-constitution that stipulates the need for Hong Kong legislators and other officials to swear allegiance to China when assuming office.

The People’s Daily editorial said, calls for Hong Kong independence by the Hong Kong lawmakers-elect and others were an insult to China and violation of the national constitution and the Basic Law.  Such actions, “seriously touches the bottom line of ‘one country, two systems’, endangers national unity, territorial integrity and national security, jeopardises the nation’s core interests and the basic interests of the majority of Hong Kong residents, and is vile in nature,” it said. “The heart of the issue is that anyone who splits the nation or promotes ‘Hong Kong independence’ is directly violating the constitution, the Basic Law and related Hong Kong laws, and is unqualified to stand for election or hold public office provided for in the Basic Law,” it added.

An interpretation of the Basic Law by the NPC Standing Committee would be completely legal, “extremely timely, extremely necessary, of great importance and have far-reaching effect”, it said. The NPC Standing Committee has interpreted the Basic Law four times since 1997, including once when neither the city government nor its courts requested it. After the abortive swearing-in ceremony by Yau Wai-ching, 25, and Baggio Leung, 30, Hong Kong’s chief executivem filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction against them getting another chance. Hong Kong’s High Court struck down that request but approved a judicial review hearing over the pair’s membership of the legislature.

The Hong Kong Bar Association has said an intervention by Beijing now, would deal a “severe blow” to the city’s judicial independence and undermine international confidence in Hong Kong’s autonomy.