The National Freedom Front (NFF), a key ally of President Mahinda Rajapaksa on Sunday expressed doubts over India’s motives in abstaining at the UNHRC vote against Sri Lanka.
“We have to closely examine why India abstained,” Mohamed Muzammil, the NFF spokesman told reporters.
“India not only voted in favour of the resolution in 2012 and 2013, they played a leading role in getting votes in favour of the US resolutions each year,” Muzammil stressed.
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
“This year they abstained. We think that they now want to force Sri Lanka to implement the thirteenth amendment.”
Despite the concerns of his nationalist ally, President Rajapaksa, buoyed by India’s decision, ordered the immediate release of all Indian fishermen held in Sri Lankan custody for alleged poaching.
India the architect of the 1987 Indo-Lanka Peace Accord between the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and President Jayawardene of Sri Lanka have been consistently advocating the thirteenth amendment as the solution to the demand of Tamil self determination.
Sinhalese majority groups argue that a northern provincial council with unfettered political powers such as land and police force control would lead to the separation of the island.