Wednesday, Nov 26, 2014

Indian doctor convicted of sexual assault loses latest bid to stay in Australia

The doctor has been fighting to stay in Perth since he was released from jail after serving more than 18 months for sexually abusing a 19-year-old girl. The doctor has been fighting to stay in Perth since he was released from jail after serving more than 18 months for sexually abusing a 19-year-old girl.
Press Trust of India | Melbourne | Posted: February 25, 2014 9:52 am

An India-born doctor, convicted of sexually assaulting a patient while working at an Australian hospital, has lost his bid to stay in the country.

A Federal Court judge dismissed Suhail Durani’s plea yesterday, but his defence lawyer Shahid Shakur said they intend to take the case to the full bench of the court.

Durani, 36, has been fighting to stay in Perth since he was released from jail after serving more than 18 months for sexually abusing a 19-year-old girl at Royal Perth Hospital in 2010.

“He’s utterly disappointed of course. He has been in detention now for nearly six months and at the time of the judgement obviously we expected a different decision,” Shakur was quoted as saying in an ABC report.

“We respect the decision. It’s obviously appealable but it will depend on the counsel’s advice,” he said.

His client who had a wife and young son, had an arguable case, he said.

“We believe that the Minister has made the errors. While we respect the judgement of his Honour today, as soon as we have the counsel advice and we have read the reasoning for the decision, we will be in a decision to take further steps,” he said adding, “We have not been able to read the judgement as yet.”

Shakur said Durani was not yet facing deportation and would remain in detention until the appeal process is resolved.

“If he doesn’t appeal then he faces deportation under the law, but if he appeals against the decision he does not obviously,” he said.

“As we understand, appeals can take up to six months,” Shakur said.

Durani has 21 days to lodge an appeal. He had lost a bid to appeal against his conviction in 2012 and was fighting to stay back in the country. He had maintained his innocence and sought leave to appeal on seven grounds, including that his defence lawyer had acted incompetently.

The three Appeal Court judges dismissed his plea, refusing six of the seven grounds. His visa was also cancelled by the Federal Government last year.

comments powered by Disqus
Featured ad: Discount Shopping