House votes to block Obama administration rules on public lands, education

The House voted, 234-186, to repeal a rule that requires federal land managers to consider climate change and other long-term effects of proposed development on public lands.

By: AP | Washington | Published:February 8, 2017 8:28 am
US House of Representatives, US Senate, Republicans, Barack Obama, Obama, Obama-era legislations, US news, world news, latest news, indian express The House votes come after lawmakers approved three other resolutions last week that target environmental rules adopted in the final months of Barack Obama’s term. (AP File Photo)

The Republican-controlled House has voted to overturn Obama-era rules on the environment and education as GOP lawmakers seek to reverse years of what they see as excessive government regulation during the past eight years of a Democratic president. The House voted, 234-186, to repeal a rule that requires federal land managers to consider climate change and other long-term effects of proposed development on public lands. The rule also requires the federal Bureau of Land Management to use the best available science in making decisions about the 245 million acres of public lands it oversees, mostly in the West.

Watch What Else Is Making News

Lawmakers also voted, 234-190, to repeal a separate measure aimed at helping states identify failing schools and come up with plans to improve them. The rule provides a framework for states to develop their own accountability plans under a bipartisan education law signed by President Barack Obama in 2015.

The two measures now go to the Senate. Republicans called both rules examples of government overreach. The land-management rule “imposes Washington’s vision on land management over vast areas of the West,” said House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

The rule “was devised by people who don’t live on our land and who don’t know our land, and they just try to dictate how to use our land,” McCarthy said. “They are undermining the very idea of multiple use of federal lands by making the lands entirely off limits for any type of economic purposes.”

McCarthy and other critics say the new rule improperly shifts decision-making authority away from state and local officials to the federal government.

The House votes come after lawmakers approved three other resolutions last week that target environmental rules adopted in the final months of Obama’s term.

Lawmakers backed measures scuttling regulations that prevented coal mines from dumping debris into nearby streams; clamped down on oil companies that burn off natural gas during drilling operations; and forced energy companies to disclose payments to foreign governments relating to mining and drilling.

Rep Bradley Byrne, R-Ala., called the land-management rule “government overreach at its worst” and said land-use planning has historically been and should remain a function of local government.

“The federal government should not be telling states and local government what works best for them,” he said. The Obama administration said the planning rule would help federal land managers address issues such as increased wildfires and an influx of invasive species.

The rule also requires that management plans be updated more frequently and adhere to a 2013 climate change strategy ordered by former Interior Secretary Sally Jewell. Under the previous rule, the land-management bureau took an average of eight years to finish a land use plan.

Video of the day

For all the latest World News, download Indian Express App

    Live Cricket Scores & Results