Farmers protests: What is Swaminathan Commission Report and how is its implementation relevant?

Madhya Pradesh farmers protests: NCF’s Swaminathan Commission Report aimed at working out a system for food and nutrition security, sustainability in farming system, enhancing quality and cost competitiveness of farm commodities.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: June 8, 2017 7:12 pm
farmers protests, madhya pradesh, Swaminathan Commission Report Dr Swaminathan had requested the government to implement the recommendations given in the report so that it could provide minimum support price for grains, safeguard the interest of small farmers and addressing the issue of increasing risk overtaking agriculture as a profession. (Representational image/Reuters)

As farmers stage agitations in several states, the importance of implementation of the Swaminathan Commission report has been highlighted. The report that suggests reforms in the interests of farmers is being touted as the solution to the problems of farmers agitating across states. 

What is the Swaminathan Commission?

The government of India constituted the National Commission on Farmers (NCF) on November 18, 2004. The NCF was chaired by Professor M.S. Swaminathan. It submitted five reports to the government. The first was submitted in December 2004 and the fifth and final report was submitted on October 4, 2006. The reports had suggestions for “faster and more inclusive growth” for farmers as was envisaged in the Planning Commission’s Approach to 11th Five Year Plan. The fifth report was the most crucial as it contained suggestions for inclusive growth of farmers and agriculture sector. NCF’s Swaminathan Commission Report aimed at working out a system for food and nutrition security, sustainability in the farming system, enhancing quality and cost competitiveness of farm commodities and also to recommend measures for credit and other marketing related steps.

Dr Swaminathan had requested the government to implement the recommendations given in the report so that it could provide minimum support price for grains, safeguard the interest of small farmers and addressing the issue of increasing risk overtaking agriculture as a profession.

What were the Commission’s observations?

The Commission observed that farmers needed to have an assured access to and control over rightful basic resources. These basic resources include land, water, bioresources, credit and insurance, technology and knowledge management, and markets. It observed that agriculture must be implemented in the concurrent list from the state list — hence putting it as a matter of concern for both the Union and the states.

What are the Commission’s key recommendations?

One of the key reforms was, of course, land reforms. It was aimed to address the issue of access to and for both crops and livestock. The commission said that the inequality in landholdings in shown starkly in land ownership. It said that in 1991-92, the share of the bottom 50 per cent of the rural households in the country’s total land ownership was only three per cent. The top 10 per cent owned as much as 54 per cent.  

Land Reforms: Distribution of ceiling-surplus and waste lands; prevention of diversion of prime agricultural land and forest to corporate sector for non-agricultural use; to ensure grazing rights are provided and seasonal access is allowed in forests to tribals and pastoralists. It recommended access to common property resources. One main case was establishing a National Land Use Advisory Service. The purpose of this service would be to connect land usage decisions with ecological meteorological and marketing factors.

Irrigation Reforms: It recommended framing a set of reforms to provide farmers with “sustained and equitable” access to water for irrigation. Ensuring boost in water supply by rainwater harvesting, water level recharging by mandatory aquifers; Million Wells Recharge programme to be initiated targeted at private wells. To target increase in investment in irrigation sector under 11th five year plan.

Productivity Growth: NCF said that with the objective of achieving higher productivity growth, it recommended “Substantial increase in public investment in agriculture-related infrastructure particularly in irrigation, drainage, land development, water conservation, research development and road connectivity etc.” It also recommended a national network of advanced soil testing labs with an aim to test areas for apt micronutrient levels.

Credit and Insurance: Expand outreach of formal credit system; reduce crop loan interest rates to 4%; provide moratorium on debt recovery; agricultural risk fund; kisan credit cards for women farmers; integrated credit-cum-crop-livestock human health insurance package; crop insurance across country for all crops with reduced premiums; sustainable livelihoods for the poor, investment in human development; institutional development services etc

Food Security: The commission recommended Implementation of a universal public distribution system; reorganising delivery of nutrition support programmes on a life-cycle basis with panchayat participation and that of local bodies; elimination of micronutrient deficiency induced hunger and food cum fortification; community food and water banks to be operated by women self-help groups; help small and marginal farmers; formulate national food guarantee act with features as food for work and employment guarantee programmes.

Prevention of Farmer Suicides: Providing affordable health insurance at primary healthcare centres in villages; national rural health mission to be extended to suicide hotspots on priority basis; state level farmers’ commissions with representatives of farmers, restructuring of microfinance policies that may serve as a sort of livelihood finance; covering all crops by crop insurance; village to be the assessor and not the block, social security net that gives old age support with health insurance and aquifer recharge and rain water conservation; plans for decentralised water usage etc.

For all the latest What Is News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    ak dev
    Jun 9, 2017 at 1:24 am
    MS Swaminathan's MSP formula is faulty and has not been implemented by successive governments. His formula adds a percentage of land value to the MSP which is not correct as land value only appreciates. Even farmers don't add this part in the cost of their produce.
    Reply
    1. K
      KS
      Jun 10, 2017 at 7:01 am
      Was MS Swaminathan formula "faulty" when BJP put up in its poll menifesto? OR the formula became faulty because farmers started asking for its implementation?
      Reply
    2. M
      MSS.the.murderer
      Jun 8, 2017 at 10:12 pm
      From Wikipedia: The first among those who came to expose many of the claims made by MS Swaminathan was Claude Alvares. In his article The Great Gene Robbery 23 March 1986 The Illustrated Weekly.[70] Alvares provided arguments to show that most of the research that was initiated by him and the International Rice Research Ins ute was not original.
      Reply
      1. K
        KS
        Jun 8, 2017 at 10:45 pm
        MS Swaminathan is internationally acclaimed & recognised food scientist and winner of World Food Prize. Do not make fool of yourself by making such blatant lies & remarks against Dr.MS Swaminathan.
        Reply
        1. J
          John Joseph
          Jun 9, 2017 at 3:18 am
          Claude Alvares was who again? Anyone can write anything when they cannot adjust to the fact that this person was acclaimed scientist and even Mexico gave him highest civilian award.
          Reply
        2. N
          Nagarajan
          Jun 8, 2017 at 10:05 pm
          When he was president of International Rice Research ins ute that fellow stole rice variety from Tamil Nadu and declared it as his development. Such low life can be found only among brahmins!
          Reply
          1. J
            John Joseph
            Jun 9, 2017 at 3:17 am
            jihadi trol . Alert.
            Reply
            1. K
              KS
              Jun 10, 2017 at 7:05 am
              Sir, why don't you lodge a police complaint against Swaminathan for "stea " rice variety from Tamilnadu instead of level false accusations?
              Reply
            2. N
              Nagar Iyer
              Jun 8, 2017 at 9:31 pm
              Swaminathan is the biggest fraud & traitor of India. He allowed the Americans loot India in the name of GREEN REVOLUTION by allowing harmful chemicals & poisonous pesticides. Swaminathan is one of the criminals who destro Indian Agriculture & pushed Indian farmers to suicide.
              Reply
              1. S
                Srividya
                Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 pm
                I was about to write the same! Adding to that he took istance of IB to kill his istant who was about to whistle blow his fraud. IB provides such services to foreign corporations too.
                Reply
                1. J
                  John Joseph
                  Jun 9, 2017 at 3:17 am
                  jihadi alert.
                  1. S
                    Srinivas.Dh2016
                    Jun 9, 2017 at 3:28 pm
                    Now his organization got some crores of rupees grant to promote "organic cultivation" Srinivas.Dik
                  2. K
                    KS
                    Jun 10, 2017 at 7:15 am
                    BJP promised in writing to implement Swaminathan report recommendations in its poll menifesto in 2014 while seeking votes from gullible farmers. BJP did not implement Swaminathan report recommendations for three years & now farmers are agitating for its implementation, therefore, now Swaminathan has become 'the biggest fraud & traitor of India". If Swaminathan is "the biggest fraud & traitor of India", why don't the govt act against him?
                    Reply