15 hilarious reactions to SC’s ruling on national anthem being played before film screenings

The Supreme Court said that playing of National Anthem in movie theatres is mandatory.

By: Trends Desk | Updated: December 1, 2016 11:39 am
Supreme Court said National Anthem has to be played in all movie theatres across the country Supreme Court said National Anthem has to be played in all movie theatres across the country

On November 30, the Supreme Court said that playing the National Anthem before the movies in theatres is mandatory because it would “instill a sense of committed patriotism and nationalism” in citizens. In addition to that, pictures of the national flag will also be displayed after the anthem and people must honour them and stand up while it lasts.

“Time has come for people to realise that the national anthem is a symbol of constitutional patriotism…people must feel they live in a nation and this wallowing individually perceived notion of freedom must go…people must feel this is my country, my motherland,” the court said.

WATCH VIDEO: Supreme Court Makes Playing National Anthem At Theaters Mandatory

Soon after the judgment, people took to various social media platforms to opine on the matter, with a generous dose of sarcasm, questioning this genre of patriotism being ‘imposed’ on them. Some, in all seriousness, have even pointed out how it’ll probably be an insult to the National Anthem if it’s played before movies with adult sensibilities. “Nothing ignites the patriotic in you as standing up for the national anthem right before watching a movie like grand masti,” tweeted someone.

Obviously, there are exceptions made to the rule, for instance, elders and those with disabilities are exempt from the ruling for now, but the decision hasn’t gone down well with many on social media, and they’ve used their favourite weapon of humour and sarcasm to put their point across.

Sample these.

The court order came on a PIL filed by Shyam Narayan Chouksey, a retired engineer in Bhopal. Chouksey had brought before the bench examples to illustrate how provisions of Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, were being breached.

For all the latest Trending News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Ajit
    Dec 1, 2016 at 6:44 am
    If I shoot someone who does not stand up for the national anthem in a movie hall, will the SC take a lenient view and pardon me???? Better still will the government confer a Padmaja Vibhushan for recognising my exemplary patriotism ???
    Reply
    1. S
      sandy
      Nov 30, 2016 at 11:04 am
      "Some one may have ensure a chairman ship in some committee for sure.
      Reply
    2. A
      AG
      Nov 30, 2016 at 10:44 am
      Track these buggers down and slap cases on them- Yes we are intolerant - if its insulting to our nation.
      Reply
    3. B
      Ballu
      Nov 30, 2016 at 1:25 pm
      The movie should be made only for patriotism.. Songs in between should be anthem.. I love it
      Reply
      1. E
        Elvak Enterprise
        Dec 1, 2016 at 7:10 pm
        Can the Supreme Court p the law that the National Anthem be sung in the court house before any proceedings this will be a very good example to the poce. As soon a s a judge comes into the court the National Anthem should be sang. I of the view that the National Anthem should be sang in schools, Lok sabha, Rajya Sabha, court houses, Political Gathering, Major sport compeions, the police station at office opening.
        Reply
        1. N
          Nitin Raval
          Nov 30, 2016 at 6:27 pm
          Shyam Narayan Choukse should have filled a PIL for abolishing the present National Anthem, which is a symbol of SLAVERY TO THE BRITISHERS.
          Reply
          1. S
            Shri Soni
            Dec 3, 2016 at 5:49 am
            We are citizens of an evolving democracy; Most of us are ready to sacrifice entertainment for greater cause of patriotism or idealism of unity of largest democracy ...just like everyone is seen in ques to follow the idealism of wiping out black money. ..
            Reply
            1. R
              Raj Mohan
              Nov 30, 2016 at 11:01 am
              Judicial activism at its worst. Courts should leave such matters to the Government.lt;br/gt;patriotism cant be imposed like this
              Reply
              1. Load More Comments