• Associate Sponsor

US indicts owner of Kickass Torrents for copyright infringement

One of the domains operated by KAT, Kat.cr, was the 70th most popular website in the world according to Alexa

By: Reuters | Updated: July 21, 2016 6:54 pm
kickass torrents, kat torrents, kat, kat.cr, kat copyright infringement, Artem vaulin arrested, kickass torrent owner US officials claim that KAT has a net worth of more than million

The owner of file-sharing website Kickass Torrents was indicted in the United States on Wednesday for copyright infringement related to the distribution of more than $1 billion worth of movies, video games, music recordings and other content, U.S. justice officials said.

Artem Vaulin, 30, of Ukraine, was arrested in Poland and U.S. officials want him extradited to face charges that include conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement and conspiracy to commit money laundering, according to attorneys for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

U.S. officials alleged that KAT, which operates in about 28 languages, has a net worth of more than $54 million and illegally made available for download movies that were still in theaters such as “Independence Day: Resurgence” and “Finding Dory,” the complaint stated.
The indictment stated that for financial gain the peer-to-peer file-sharing website, also known as Kickass Torrents, distributed since 2008 copyrighted works such as this year’s film “Captain America: Civil War.”

Justice officials and artists’ groups have gone after other websites that provided venues for file sharing, such as Napster and Megaupload. The founder of Megaupload, known as Kim Dotcom, is fighting extradition to the United States and has denied allegations that his site has cost film and record companies more than $500 million in revenue.

Kickass Torrents has been taken down, but would this work: Watch here


“Copyright infringement exacts a large toll, a very human one, on the artists and businesses whose livelihood hinges on their creative inventions,” U.S. attorney Zachary Fardon said in a statement.

“Vaulin allegedly used the Internet to cause enormous harm to those artists,” Fardon said, adding that KAT relied on computer servers around the world due to efforts to halt illegal file sharing.

There was no legal representation listed for Vaulin in any court docket, a U.S. Department of Justice spokesman said. The company could not be reached through websites, which were experiencing outages, and there was no immediate response to a request sent to KAT through social media.

For all the latest Technology News, download Indian Express App

  1. H
    Jul 21, 2016 at 9:35 am
    1. S
      Some Guy
      Jul 23, 2016 at 3:03 am
      The w situation is blown out of proportion. There is VERY LITTLE lost revenue compared to the numbers they suggest. I often download things that I would NEVER pay for but I will take them if hey are free. Using staggering numbers like 1 Billion worth of content and 500 Million in lost revenue just make things look worse than they are.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;If I can't get a copy of Nurse Jackie in my country or would never pay good money for a Taylor Swift song, there is no revenue to lose. They did not lose money in a situation where I was never prepared to pay in the first place. I would simply live without the content in question and continue with my daily lifelt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;The result is $0 revenue for the industry that is crying about things and this is the exact same amount they would have received if the content was not available through torrents. I would have never spent money in the first place so how could they possibly lose anything.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;When movies are truly worth viewing in the "Theatre" experience, I will go to the theatre and see it there, the rest of the content I will see on TV or ignore. Either way, I would not have spent money and therefore they did not actually lose anything.