Ravi Shastri to meet new panel on Tuesday to solve support-staff mess

The four-member committee would comprise Diana Edulji, member of Supreme Court-appointed Committee of Administrators (COA), BCCI’s acting president CK Khanna, the acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary, and the BCCI CEO Rahul Johri.

Written by Vishal Menon , Devendra Pandey | New Delhi/mumbai | Updated: July 16, 2017 10:03 am
Ravi Shastri, Ravi Shastri to meet new panel, Zaheer Khan, Rahul Dravid, Committee of Administrators (COA), BCCI’s acting president CK Khanna, Amitabh Choudhary, BCCI CEO Rahul Johri, Vinod Rai, Dravid and Zaheer, Sourav Ganguly, Sachin Tendulkar, VVS Laxman, Sports News, Indian Express News Vinod Rai insists that CAC’s were recommendations, not appointments.

Ravi Shastri, India’s new head coach, would meet a four-member committee formed by the Indian cricket board on Tuesday to sort out the support staff issue that has been raging on for the past few days. The meeting on Tuesday will strive to answer three questions currently plaguing Indian cricket. Is Zaheer Khan willing to take up the role? Is Shastri interested in just using Zaheer occasionally on a need-to basis? Would the consultant role stretch Dravid too much as he is already the coach of India A and U-19 teams? It’s learnt that Shastri hasn’t yet told the BCCI that he does not want the services of Rahul Dravid and Zaheer.

The four-member committee would comprise Diana Edulji, member of Supreme Court-appointed Committee of Administrators (COA), BCCI’s acting president CK Khanna, the acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary, and the BCCI CEO Rahul Johri. Shastri was expected to arrive from US on Saturday night.

There have been a few twists and U-turns already in the last few days. The latest came on July 15 when Vinod Rai, the head of COA, said that the decision by the Cricket Advisory Committee to name Dravid and Zaheer were just “recommendations”, and not appointments. “There is no such thing as a contract yet. A recommendation was made and the COA has to act on that recommendation. That recommendation would be acted upon in consultation with the head coach,” was how Rai put it on Saturday. “Whether it’s Zaheer Khan or Dravid, they have other assignments. We have to ascertain their willingness and availability. Dravid is committed elsewhere. So is Zaheer. Secondly, we have to see conflict of interest issues,” Rai said. Dravid is the junior-team coach, and Zaheer plays in IPL.

However, this contradicts what Sourav Ganguly, member of CAC, said as late as Friday. “Zaheer will be contracted for 150 days per year,” Ganguly told reporters. Which was soon negated by the BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary who said: “I’m not aware of this.” Rai, however, dismissed it, saying Zaheer has “outrightly denied it. Controversy had broken out soon after Shastri’s appointment as reports emerged that COA wasn’t happy that the CAC, comprising of Sachin Tendulkar, VVS Laxman, and Ganguly, had extended their briefs by naming Zaheer and Dravid as consultants.

Hurt by the accusations that they had breached their roles, the CAC wrote to Rai that he was kept in loop about what had transpired in the selection meeting. “We spoke to Mr Shastri about getting Mr Khan and Mr Dravid on board in these capacities, and he readily agreed to the idea of having them in the set-up so that it would benefit the team and Indian cricket as a whole in time to come. It was only after getting Mr Shastri’s consent that we also recommended Mr Khan and Mr Dravid, in their respective capacities … Also, we did inform you (Rai) over the phone along with Rahul Johri and Amitabh Choudhary of all that transpired immediately after the meeting was over.”

On July 12, a press release (“COA hails CAC”) from BCCI had said, the board would “accept the recommendations in totality”. But three days later, they have turned their backs on it.

For all the latest Sports News, download Indian Express App

  1. G
    G.SAI BABU
    Jul 18, 2017 at 8:58 pm
    Now Ravi Shastri gave a big jolt to CAC and BCCI which deserves for messing up the things after being after appointment of Chief Coach by CAC and BCCI.
    Reply
    1. S
      Sudarshan Nityananda
      Jul 16, 2017 at 4:19 pm
      The star cricketers of the CAC haven't understood even the basics of administration. They don't realize that their mandate was limited to selecting the head coach . After also selecting the bowling and batting "consultants" they now tell Rai and the BCCI -"we kept you informed all along". That is not the point. The celebrated A.Raja also kept MMS and his other colleagues "informed" about various decisions being taken by him, but that didn't make them right .
      Reply
      1. B
        baskar guha
        Jul 16, 2017 at 2:05 pm
        Cricket administration in India is now a complete joke. No wonder the likes of Kohli and Shastri take advantage of their incompetence. When the autocrats ran the BCCI, at least there was competence but along with corruption.
        Reply
        1. C
          Chandrasekaran Venkataraman
          Jul 16, 2017 at 12:46 pm
          BCCI should be dissolved first. Otherwise, better that Shastri consults Kohli for the support staff selection ! Shame on Crciket administration.
          Reply
          1. S
            S dutta
            Jul 16, 2017 at 12:03 pm
            If I want to choose my candidate I may choose or form such a comitte and appoint such members in my committee so that they give consent to my candidate so as to tell public that it is not my sole decision but decision of a respectable committee so as india is not my personal property.. ent of a layman
            Reply
            1. T
              T DUTTA
              Jul 16, 2017 at 12:00 pm
              WHEN AN ALLROUNDER IS APPOINTED COACH WHY BATTING COACH AND BOWLING COACH ARE REQUIRED?----IF A BATSMAN IS APPOINTED COACH THEN A BOWLING COACH MAY BE REQUIRED---SIMILARLY IF A BOWLER IS APPOINTED AS COACH THEN A BATTING COACH IS REQUIRED---RAVI SHASTRI IS AN ALL ROUNDER--HE WAS CHAMPION OF CHAMPION IN 1985 BENSEN AND HEDGES CUP,AUSTRALIA----why waste money?
              Reply
              1. T
                T DUTTA
                Jul 16, 2017 at 11:56 am
                EVERY SPORTS BODY HAVING HUGE TRANSACTIONS OF THOUSANDS OF CRORES MUST HAVE PEST CONTROL AGREMENTS WITH PEST CONTROL SERVICE PROVIDERS-------otherwise important documents may not be available when needed--THESE MAY BE DESTROYED BY WHITE ANTS---rich sports bodies cannot say that they have no money for doing pest control---that is not acceptable----[THIS IS A GENERAL COMMENT NOT DIRECTED AGAINST ANYONE IN PARTICULAR--any similarity is only ACCIDENTAL AND NOT DELIBERATE]
                Reply
                1. R
                  RAMASWAMY
                  Jul 16, 2017 at 11:07 am
                  this desh dhrohi vinod rai is the basic root cause of what happened in indian politics after 2011. He unrolled his bags of lies with astronomical zeros and all those lies went uncontested and everybody was fooled by him. THE MOST OBNOXIOUS PERSON.
                  Reply
                  1. K
                    k p
                    Jul 16, 2017 at 1:00 pm
                    You have hit the nail on its head !
                    Reply
                  2. Load More Comments