Sunday, Nov 23, 2014
The England pacer has a history of sledging and instigating behaviour (Source: AP)  The England pacer has a history of sledging and instigating behaviour (Source: AP)
Written by Sandeep Dwivedi | Southampton | Posted: August 2, 2014 2:58 am | Updated: August 2, 2014 1:17 pm

Less than 24 hours after asking tough questions to the Indian bowlers at the Rose Bowl, the third Test Man of the Match, James Anderson, was at the Grand Harbour conference hall to answer a few uncomfortable queries himself.

A couple of days after his 32nd birthday, the world’s premier swing bowler, who is just 13 wickets away from overtaking Ian Botham as England’s most successful bowler ever, was one of the central characters in a kind of row that’s more common between unruly kindergarten kids in queue during bathroom recess than international cricketers at lunch break.

“He abused me, he pushed me,” complains one. “But he was the one who provoked me,” replies another.

The arguments that school teachers deal with everyday were being vehemently discussed by high-profile lawyers quoting complex disciplinary clauses in front of a giant screen installed in a Southampton hotel that in turn was wired to a judicial commissioner sitting 10,000 miles away in Australia.

Couldn’t this seemingly juvenile issue be sorted out in a mature way? Wouldn’t a pulled ear here or a rap on the knuckles there have ended this unwanted drama that is smudging this engrossing series? Actually, the ICC had tried its best to defuse this crisis with backroom parleys. That’s the reason the incident remained under wraps as the world body tried convincing the BCCI and the ECB to move on.

It was only on July 15 when the teams reached Lord’s for the second Test that the July 10 — second day of the Test — altercation between the players came to light. This was also because of the ECB media statement that had expressed disappointment about the Indian board slapping Anderson with a Level-3 violation of the ICC Code of Conduct. Out of the blue, the story had moved without the introductory first chapter.

The reason the ICC-BCCI-ECB efforts failed is because Mahendra Singh Dhoni was very keen on pressing charges against Anderson. By doing so, he was merely giving an official voice to the murmurs in the Indian dressing room and making public the talk on the cricket circuit around the world. He had the support of the manager on this tour, Sunil Dev.

Regulars in the Indian team, those who have faced-off against Anderson in the 2011 away series, World Cup, the 2013 home series and now, call him a habitual sly sledger. For a man who had just one Code of Conduct violation against him, Anderson has perfected the art of instigating his rivals without being seen or heard.

His constant chatter with his hand on the mouth, hiding the lip movement that scores of cameras covering the game catch, is as much a part of his arsenal as his breathtaking swing, deadly seam movement and the surprise bouncer.

Mean and wily

They say, Anderson is mean continued…

comments powered by Disqus