Former BCCI chief Sharad Pawar wants Justice J N Patel, who is part of a three-man probe panel set up by the Board to investigate the IPL corruption scandal, to come clean on his reported links with the body’s interim President Shivlal Yadav.
He also deprecated the presence of former India captain Ravi Shastri on the inquiry committee, citing conflict of interest.
“I think Patel should definitely disclose if he is related to the BCCI’s interim president Shivlal Yadav. If not, then BCCI should clarify and should not allow these type of discussions,” Pawar told PTI in an interview.
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
The names of the former Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court, Shastri and ex-CBI director R K Raghavan were approved by the Board members at an emergent working committee meeting on Sunday.
Their names would be submitted for approval of the Supreme Court which is hearing the the IPL scandal, with the next hearing scheduled on Monday.
The SC had directed the BCCI at the last hearing on April 16 to suggest names of persons who will conduct a “fair probe” into the IPL 6 spot-fixing and betting scandal.
The apex court is expected to consider the suggestion by the BCCI and pass orders on the future course of the probe.
“I don’t know him (Patel) personally, but I think it is his duty to disclose if this news (information) is correct,” Pawar said.
“This morning, I got a call from some BCCI member that there is a judge J N Patel. I know he was a very upright judge when he was here. He had taken very tough responsibilities and had performed very well.
“But the issue which I was not aware of. Somebody rang me up from Andhra Pradesh this morning, saying the BCCI’s interim president Shivlal Yadav and Patel are close relatives. Brother-in-law or something like that. I don’t know.
“If the news is correct, then the people will judge. Generally, I have seen many times (that) a judge, if there is some lawyer who is close to him is there, will immediately recuse himself from the case,” Pawar said.
“I am sure that knowing fully well Justice Patel’s reputation, he will not allow this type of a thing,” he added.
Pawar, a former president of the International Cricket Council, also questioned the eligibility of Shastri to be a member of the probe panel because of the conflict of interest issue as the player-turned-commentator has got a financial contract with BCCI.
“Ravi Shastri is a good player. In fact, when I was BCCI chief (2005-08), we signed a contract with him and Sunil Gavaskar. So, he had a financial contract with BCCI. Now, someone says how can a person who has got a financial contract with BCCI, become part of an inquiry committee of BCCI chief,” he said.
“I have no reservation about Shastri’s integrity, his honesty. But definitely, anybody can raise the issue. And that is why, a sensible person will try to keep away from this (probe panel).”
Asked if Shastri should dissociate himself, Pawar said, “He has a financial contract (with BCCI). That is not the case with Patel.”
On allegations against former IPL chief Lalit Modi and embattled BCCI chief N Srinivasan, who has been ordered by the SC to step aside when the IPL probe is on, Pawar said, “I don’t think Modi has done any harm. Unfortunately, about Srinivasan, I haven’t got any details. But whatever action has been taken recently was essentially taken by judiciary.
“It was the Supreme Court which said that ‘A’ should not be there and that ‘B’ should be there. There were certain complaints and judiciary felt that these complaints should be investigated,” Pawar said.
Pawar talked in glowing terms about Srinivasan’s predecessor Shashank Manohar, who was once part of the NCP chief’s core team which overthrew Jagmohan Dalmiya from BCCI. Pawar called Manohar him a good admistrator.
“Manohar is a good administrator. He has no personal interest. His genuine interest is in the game. I accept that whatever he says will always be in the interest of the game. Manohar’s performance as an administrator was in a very straight forward and transparent manner,” he said.
Though bedevilled with myriad problems since its inception in 2008 when he was the BCCI chief, Pawar was upbeat about the future of the cash-rich IPL.
“I think IPL is doing well. I have not been able to follow it because of these elections. IPL is a product developed by India, by the BCCI when I was its president,” Pawar said.
“IPL has been accepted by the global cricketing community and all cricketing coutries are part of IPL, which is watched not only in India but outside too,” he said, adding, “This is the great contribution of Indian cricket and BCCI.”