To escape perjury charge, Supreme Court asks Anurag Thakur to apologise

Apex Court said prima facie evidence against BCCI president about seeking a letter from ICC to inquire if one of the recommended reforms meant government interference.

Written by Utkarsh Anand | New Delhi | Updated: December 16, 2016 1:05 am
Anurag Thakur, BCCI, Anurag, BCCI president, Supreme Court, BCCI Lodha Panel, Lodha Panel, Cricket news, Cricket Anurag Thakur would have to apologise if he wanted to escape the charges, to which Kapil Sibal readily agreed. (Source: PTI)

 

Observing that it is inclined to launch prosecution against BCCI president Anurag Thakur for committing perjury, the Supreme Court on Thursday said that he will go to jail if held guilty of lying under oath in his attempts to obstruct reforms in the cricket body. A bench led by Chief Justice of India TS Thakur stated that Anurag was prima facie culpable under charges of contempt of court and perjury as he apparently lied about seeking a letter from the International Cricket Council to assert that one of the Lodha panel recommendations on cricket reforms amounted to governmental interference.

The court reserved its order on a verdict whether Anurag should be prosecuted for perjury, and also said it would pronounce upon as to a panel of administrators should replace Anurag and other office-bearers to allow implementation of the Lodha panel reforms.

On being asked by the court, Anurag had in October filed an affidavit saying he had sought a letter of “clarification” from ICC president Shashank Manohar in August regarding a position taken by Manohar as the BCCI chief that having a nominee of the Comptroller and Auditor General in the working committee will tantamount to governmental interference.

But Anurag denied having made a request to the ICC to write to the BCCI that Lodha panel’s intervention was like governmental interference. However, Manohar, in his response to the court’s query, said that Anurag had indeed sought a letter from him but he refused to issue it, saying the Supreme Court has already ruled upon this aspect by a judgment a month ago.

Juxtaposing Anurag’s affidavit and Manohar’s response, the bench, also comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, said that Anurag was prima facie in contempt and had also committed perjury. “We are inclined to launch prosecution against your client (Anurag)…once we pronounce on this, your client will have nowhere to go but to jail. And if we say you are guilty of perjury, do you think any other court will grant you any relief?,” the bench told senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, who appeared for the BCCI.

The court called it “very unfortunate” and “frustrating” that Anurag was apparently trying to obstruct reforms and was creating hurdles at each step. “This court heard you and all the state associations. We gave you time and said it repeatedly that do not make things unpleasant. Three former judges of this court (Lodha panel) make well-meaning recommendations in the interest of the game but you are trying to obstruct them at every stage,” said the bench.

It remarked that Anurag would have to apologise if he wanted to escape the charges, to which Sibal readily agreed.

However, the court then said that it would examine his conduct and pass appropriate orders — most likely in the first week of January.

The bench took strong exception to the fact that Anurag had sought such a letter in August while the judgment on having a CAG nominee had already come in July. “Where was the occasion for you to seek a letter? Do you think we don’t understand what you were trying to do? You wanted a letter so that you could come back to us saying ICC has threatened the BCCI with de-recognition if you comply with our orders. But let us tell you, these things will not work anymore,” it said.

The court rued that holding a position in the BCCI had become “such a lucrative business” that people wanted to continue as office-bearers for life and did not want to give up on it under any condition. Sibal, on his part, tried to justify Anurag’s affidavit, saying it was filed after the impugned paragraph was sent to Manohar and that he agreed with the averment.

He also said that there was no attempt to obstruct implementation of the court orders and that Anurag was ready to furnish an unconditional apology. Sibal and senior lawyer Arvind Datar also raised a point of law, saying Anurag had not been issued a notice of perjury in his personal capacity. The bench, however, retorted that it has already heard Sibal on this aspect. It also maintained that Anurag should not remain at the helm of affairs if he is charged under perjury.

SC dismisses curative petition

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed the curative petition filed by the BCCI seeking reconsideration of its verdict on implementation of reforms proposed by the Lodha panel. With dismissal of the curative petition, the BCCI is left with no legal remedy to seek modification or revision of the apex court’s July 18 judgment.

“We have gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra & Another. Hence, the Curative Petition is dismissed,” stated the order. The bench comprised Chief Justice of India T S Thakur, Justices J S Khehar and Dipak Misra – three senior most judges of the top court.

For all the latest Sports News, download Indian Express App now

  1. H
    Haary
    Jan 1, 2017 at 12:31 pm
    Supreme court is destroying INDIAN CRICKET.
    Reply
    1. S
      Sriram
      Dec 15, 2016 at 7:08 pm
      And who are the Administrators you will appoint Hon'ble SC? Retired guys from Service and Cricket? How do you think the retired cricketers will be better administrators? Aren't these the same cricketers who have the taints of the corrupt IPL?lt;br/gt;Let the BCCI be run by Professionals and make them accountable to Govt. and CAG like any PSU. So much corruption and nepotism in selection. You must be really lucky to be in a team. I was one of the affected few decades ago.
      Reply
      1. S
        srikanth
        Dec 16, 2016 at 4:19 am
        why should the supreme court ask Anurag to apologise. The supreme court should apply the law after applying principles of natural justice. VIPs should not get away with saying sorry. Its not even worth toilet paper
        Reply
        1. G
          Ganesh Khare
          Dec 15, 2016 at 5:48 pm
          Apology for perjury charges ?? Under which provision Hon'ble SC ??lt;br/gt;I hope similar opportunity is extended to all under-trials.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Bad Precedent. :(
          Reply
          1. H
            harun
            Dec 16, 2016 at 8:33 am
            Please give the same to the Aam Aadmi.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;The country will never Improve ,this is what has brought India to be in the 3 rd world and such actions will Only make people take freedom for granted
            Reply
            1. K
              Kk
              Dec 15, 2016 at 8:29 pm
              Corrupt SC judges are trying to take over the running of BCCI. If SC judges refuse to abide by the decision of parliament in the judges selection process then what moral right they have to dictate BCCI what is good for the cricket and the country. BCCI organisation have been managing for years and made lot of money besides some corruption but has served the nation well. Corrupt judges have miss used their power and gave very biased decisions in favour of criminals and the corrupt. Selection procedure for judges must be changed to bring more faith in the judicry system before they put their noses in BCCI.
              Reply
              1. V
                Vivek narain
                Dec 16, 2016 at 4:51 am
                A coterie often refuses to bow unless forced.
                Reply
                1. E
                  EssPee
                  Dec 16, 2016 at 2:56 am
                  You holier than thou 'bhakt'...it is ok to criticise a judgement if you've a point of view, but, to characterize all SC judges as corrupt is another thing. President of India, we've just found the first non-corrupt person in India worthy of being SC judge, please dismiss all of Sc and appoint him as CJI.
                  Reply
                  1. S
                    Sanjay Agrawal
                    Dec 16, 2016 at 7:13 am
                    KKji,lt;br/gt;First of all do you have any proof that the SC judges are corrupt?lt;br/gt;Secondly, the w case came to SC due to large scale corruption in the cricket particularly IPL. A few 2 persons and IPL teams were pronounced guilty of corruption. Then a committee of well meaning people with good advisers was formed to recommend ways to reform. After all arguments and counterarguments, SC pronounced the reforms. But several months after the verdict BCCI refuses to bulge from its position-that is the value of SC in their eyes. You can easily understand the lust and lure of the power and money that a BCCI administrator gets.lt;br/gt;These guys must be huntered on their ess-then also they will not budge probably.lt;br/gt;Hope you get what I mean-open your eyes dear.
                    Reply
                    1. K
                      Kumar
                      Dec 16, 2016 at 7:24 am
                      Shameless BCCI and it's office bearers. Funny thing is K.Sibal is defending Thakur .It's better for Thakur to just leave the office and follow the supreme court orders. Supreme court also should not prolong the verdict anymore.
                      Reply
                      1. Y
                        Yogesh
                        Dec 16, 2016 at 3:09 am
                        Looks like a blackmail. Though a legal one.
                        Reply
                        1. Load More Comments