BCCI president Anurag Thakur passes the buck, says Shashank Manohar opposed CAG nominee

Anurag Thakur filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court and denied stonewalling implementation of Lodha panel reforms.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Published:October 21, 2016 2:54 pm
BCCI Lodha Panel, BCCI Lodha Panel Supreme Court, Supreme Court BCCI Lodha Panel, Lodha Panel BCCI, Supreme Court order BCCI, BCCI Supreme Court order, Justice Lodha, Justice Lodha panel, Sports Time and again, Anurag Thakur has listed “impractical difficulties” in implementing Lodha reforms. (Source: Twitter)

The Supreme Court, on Monday, reserved its order related to the Lodha Panel recommendations after the BCCI requested more time for the implementation of the reforms. Earlier, BCCI president Anurag Thakur, in an affidavit filed in the Supreme Court, denied allegations that he stonewalled implementation of recommendations of Justice RM Lodha panel.

WATCH VIDEO: Another Blow to BCCI: Here’s What Happened

Thakur, in the affidavit, pointed out his conversation with former BCCI president and current ICC chairman Shashank Manohar, and mentions “Manohar explained to me when stand was taken by him, matter was pending before Court & was not decided.”

The affidavit further points out that “Manohar (when he was BCCI president) had taken a view that the recommendations of Justice Lodha committee appointing the nominee of CAG on apex council would amount to government interference and might invoke an action of suspension from ICC; therefore requested him that being the ICC Chairman can a letter be issued.”

On Saturday, during a special general body meeting of the Indian cricket board that was called to discuss the possibility of implementing the reforms recommended by the Lodha panel and directed by the apex court, the BCCI reiterated their stand that the members stood united and the call to not accept the recommendations in totality was unanimous. Meanwhile, Vidarbha, Tripura and Rajasthan are going ahead and accepting all the Lodha reforms unilaterally and Hyderabad Cricket Association has pledged compliance in an undertaking to a lower court.

Watch | Want To Become A Member Of A Cricket Association? Become A Geek First!

The Supreme Court has already frozen BCCI’s fund transfer to its state units. Several state bodies have written to the board about how lack of funds will affect their domestic cricket but many heavyweight associations are waiting for the order before making the next move.

During the October 6 hearing Gopal Subramanium, a senior lawyer and amicus curiae, said that the new administrators should be of “impeccable stature and integrity” without any criterion attached. So, if the court rules in favour of appointing an independent panel of administrators, the members could be from inside or outside the cricket set-up.

For all the latest Sports News, download Indian Express App

  1. I
    IML sood
    Oct 17, 2016 at 2:12 pm
    Proud Indian seems to be a mole from rival groups as his comments smell hate and burnt ego.Such comments reflect in what a state of affairs such haters are and cure for them seems impossible.
    Reply
    1. D
      Dr.A.Koteswara Rao
      Oct 17, 2016 at 4:43 pm
      Enough of this dodging by the BCCI.The Supreme Court instead should order them to implement the recommendations . It is obvious the BCCI is only buying time and reluctant to disturb the status quo.
      Reply
      1. B
        Balgit
        Oct 20, 2016 at 8:17 am
        One word about Anurag Thakur from wiki, "Thakur pla one Ranji trophy match inlt;br/gt;November 2000 when he was the president of HPCA and appointed himself as the chairman of selectors of HPCA Ranji trophy cricket team." Seriously, Did Anurag Thakur the President appoint himself as Selector. Did Anurag Thakur the Selector select himself into the HP cricket eam? Seriously??Cant be true. Seriously...Anurag Thakur, The BJP MP???really
        Reply
        1. P
          Phani
          Oct 17, 2016 at 9:40 am
          BCCI is playing double game. On one side they blackmail ICC that it will quit and on other side they will say we will be banned from ICC if any government has influence on BCCI.
          Reply
          1. T
            T DUTTA
            Oct 17, 2016 at 2:51 pm
            TELEVISION ADVERETISEMNTS HAVE BECOME MORE EFFECTIVE IN SPORTS THAN IN TV SERIALS OR CINEMAS
            Reply
            1. T
              T DUTTA
              Oct 17, 2016 at 2:44 pm
              THERE SHOULD BE AN UPPER LIMIT FOR FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OF ORGANISATIONS REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT-------SOME ORGANISATIONS ARE REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT BUT THEY ARE DEALING WITH THOUSANDS OF CRORES
              Reply
              1. R
                Ramsubramani Harihara Iyer
                Oct 17, 2016 at 9:59 am
                "During the October 6 hearing Gopal Subramanium, a senior lawyer and amicus curiae, said that the new administrators should be of “impeccable stature and integrity” without any criterion attached"? It appears that Mr Subramanium has forgotten the fact that this is India and his demand is unachievable.
                Reply
                1. T
                  thistooshallpass
                  Oct 17, 2016 at 1:51 pm
                  That ur is trying to play smart politics with the judiciary. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Why so much leniency to BCCI? Sack them and let cricket start afresh.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments