Allowing the BCCI to lead their battle, the Supreme Court Friday turned down a plea to direct Indian captain M S Dhoni and ousted BCCI chief N Srinivasan to individually move requests for access to audio transcripts of the contentious statements made by them before the IPL probe panel.
A bench of Justices A K Patnaik and J S Khehar shot down an objection by the Cricket Association of Bihar (CAB) that the BCCI could not have asked for the transcripts on behalf of them.
“BCCI has no locus standi (legal standing) to move this application. They want statements of Dhoni, Srinivisan and also Sunder Rajan by way of this application on their behalf. The affidavit attached with this application is of the BCCI secretary. Why? The application must be moved by them individually,” Senior advocate Ajeet Sinha, representing CAB, said.
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
The bench, however, refused to nix the BCCI plea on this ground and told the counsel that such a technical argument did not have to be entertained at this stage.
Meanwhile, a counsel, appearing for the the Mudgal probe panel, informed the bench that the audio recordings and transcripts of the impugned statements had not been placed before the bench and only minutes of the meetings were in the court.
At this, BCCI counsel CA Sundaram requested the bench to direct the panel to hand over the necessary tapes and transcripts to them so that they could argue the case effectively.
The bench, however, pointed out that the BCCI’s application requested the court to give them the audio transcripts, which were in fact not on record with them. It asked the BCCI counsel to amend their application properly and posted the matter for April 16, even as Sundaram said that it will be difficult to argue without the transcripts of the audio tapes.
The spotlight was turned on Dhoni after the panel, while holding Srinivasan’s son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan guilty of betting in IPL, had trashed the statements made before it by the beleaguered BCCI president and also by him that Meiyappan had nothing to do with the cricketing affairs of the Chennai Super Kings.