Why is the world’s attention focused on Vladimir Putin

Never before was Putin's geopolitical ambitions looked at as a serious threat to the world than in the Fall of 2016, when Russia was blamed by the US for intervening in the latter's presidential elections

Written by Radhika Iyengar | Updated: January 17, 2017 4:20 pm
Vladimir Putin, Putin, Russia, Russia Vladimir Putin, Putin Russia, Russian president Vladimir Putin, Putin rise, Syrian refugees, Bashar al-Assad, us elections, us presidential elections, St. Petersburg, Putin St. Petersburg, Russia, Russia news, indian express news Vladimir Putin had a childhood anchored in crippling poverty. (File Photo)

Of late, the world’s attention is focused on Vladimir Putin. From indiscriminately supporting Bashar al-Assad’s regime in bombing out Syrian refugees, to meddling in the US Presidential elections, Putin has rattled the world far enough to sit up and pay attention. Back in the 1990s, Putin’s rise and transformation from a KGB spy into a self-designed Czar of an authoritarian Russian empire, seemed highly unlikely and unexpected. He emerged out of nowhere – at that time, Russians had absolutely no idea who he was and Putin had to work hard in building his identity as a potent leader. He would go on to climb the ladder of politics and power in a frenzied, fevered, driven manner, which would pronounce him as one of the most powerful and dangerous leaders of the 21st century.

Putin becomes a homegrown spy

Putin had a childhood anchored in crippling poverty. He grew up in Leningrad (now known as St. Petersburg) in the 1950s. Fascinated by the KGB, a foreign intelligence committee for State Security (which disintegrated post the collapse of the Soviet Union), Putin had made up his mind to become part of the Russian espionage by the time he was 16 years old. At that time, a wide-eyed teenager with only the experience of bullying at school, Putin visited the local KGB office at Leningrad, expressing an interest in joining the service. But he was sent away. In the mid-1970s, at the age of 23, Putin returned to the KGB with a more fervent determination and a law degree in tow. This time, he was accepted and vigorously trained. On the completion of his training, Putin was sent to work as an agent in Dresden, East Germany. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Putin retired as a colonel from the KGB and focused on supporting Anatoly Sobchak, the law-professor-turned-Mayor for St. Petersburg.

With no political background, Putin becomes the deputy mayor of St. Petersburg

Under Anatoly Sobchak (1937-2000), the Mayor of St. Petersburg, Putin was given a headstart in his political career. Putin knew Sobchak since the time he was a student at a law school, where Sobchak had been his professor. When Sobchak became the first elected Mayor of Leningrad, he pushed for Putin to become his deputy (1994), where the latter ended up heading the chair of the external relations committee. During his office, from day one, Sobchak’s protege worked hard at building his image as a “saviour”, one whose priority was helping the citizens of St. Petersburg.

In the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia was facing a stinging food crisis – there was a crippling food shortage and the country had to scrounge for foreign currency to procure food from other countries. Putin announced a programme that would enable companies to sell oil and minerals, which would in turn get them money to buy food. However, there was just one problem – the money earned by these companies during the programme (1.24 million) disappeared without a trace, leaving St. Petersburg’s citizens hungry. According to sources, it was Putin who was responsible for the corruption and other economic crimes – but he was never arrested for them, because Sobchak ensured Putin’s safety. The two shared the I-scratch-your-back-you-scratch-mine relationship – therefore when Sobchak was voted out of power in 1996 for poor governance and was attacked by the press, federal prosecutors and the unhappy lot of St. Petersburg, Putin went to great lengths to protect him. He even helped the ailing Sobchak leave for Paris.

Hop-Skip-Jump: From Deputy Mayor to President to Prime Minister

In 1996, Putin’s political career nosedived when he became a part of the Kremlin, handpicked by Russia’s then President, Boris Yeltsin. The President had observed Putin’s loyalty and dedication towards his mentor Sobchak, which led Yeltsin to realise that Putin would do the same for him when he stepped down as the President. Putin would ensure that Yeltsin continued to enjoy privileges and protection under his wing. Yeltsin’s faith in him and Putin’s ambition ensured a rapid progression in Putin’s political career. From being the Deputy Chief of Staff in 1997, he was promoted as the Prime Minister in 1999, and eventually in the fall of 1999, Putin was catapulted into Yeltsin’s chair after the latter gave his resignation. Putin served as an incumbent President at that time.

However, as soon as Putin took office, the notorious apartment building bombings across Moscow, Buynaksk and Volgodonsk in September 1999 that killed hundreds took place. Many have labelled the incident as Russia’s 9/11. Almost immediately, Putin took to the media, emphatically promising revenge, projecting himself as the man who would avenge the death of his countrymen. He held separatist rebels residing in Chechnya responsible for the act, which was used to justify Russia’s ruthless invasion of Chechnya. Overnight, Putin (whom not many Russians knew about) became a popular political hero, wielding immense authority. In 2000, a few months following the apartment bombings, when Putin ran for Presidency, he won unanimously. That cemented his position in the Kremlin.

There has been grave speculation around whether the Chechen rebels were really responsible for the apartment bombings. This is because a few days after the apartment bombings in Moscow, another bomb (which was defused) was found in an apartment building basement in Ryazan. Interestingly, the bomb looked like it had been skillfully made (like the ones made by those in the military or the FSB, a secret service extension of the KGB); it looked nothing like the amateur ones made by a bunch of rebels. But many of those who’ve tried to investigate the matter further have seen unforeseeable deaths.

Russia today

In a span of 17 years, Putin has transformed Russia’s identity, making it a totalitarian country that is succeeding, showing an uptick in its progression as an economic power. In 2014, Putin went to war with Ukraine and annexed Crimea. It was a move which shocked and stunned the world, and wavered Russia’s relationships with certain countries, including the United States. But to the people of Russia, Putin’s seizure of Crimea projected him as a saviour – a defender of the Russian identity who was making ‘pragmatic’ attempts to recapture and piece together the former territories of a disintegrated Soviet Union. Putin also backed Assad’s regime in decimating the rebels in Syria that lead to the obliteration of Aleppo.

Never before, however, was Putin’s geopolitical ambitions considered as a serious threat to the world than in the Fall of 2016, when Russia was held responsible by the United States for intervening in the latter’s presidential elections. Donald Trump’s win is ominous and his unflinching favouritism for the Russian President is unnerving. If they merge their political clout once Trump ascends to power, the world will definitely be different.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. J
    Joseph
    Jan 17, 2017 at 5:39 pm
    IE ru also paid fake news I never expected IE to be one.
    Reply
    1. C
      Chandra
      Jan 18, 2017 at 5:45 pm
      Why Radhika? Have you been to Russia, met Putin personally and done any direct investigation? Your article does not cite any provable material and is just seems like regurgitated from western presses who only lie and distract the people from the real truth. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;I'll address your points:lt;br/gt;1. Ukraine/Crimea: Putin sent no army to invade it, but the US and EU conspired to oust Victor Yanukovyck who was deemed too Russia-friendly and anti-Western and they successfully ousted him in fake, staged 'maidan' revolution a.k.a thuggery (which revolutionaries throw bombs and threaten the life of any current President). It was a coup. And we have tapes of Victoria Nuland talking with a EU person which clearly implicates her and the US's nefarious plans for Ukraine. lt;br/gt;The US and EU meddled and overthrew a legitimate government in Ukraine, and Russians in Ukraine became targets, particularly in Crimea. As a natural rebellion, some took up arms, while Russia did intervene in Crimea, help a referendum and after clear results for joining with Russia (though lied about in the western mainstream media), became a part of Russia. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;2. Chechnya: The expensive bombs of Chechens were supplied by the meddling US. Period. Go figure.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;3. Syria: US/EU nexus tried replicating the success of Ukraine in Syria - oust ad, a legitimately elected government, while falsely blaming chemical attacks on ad, which are proven even now to be carried out by the rebels and Al Nusra. The US/EU is supplying arms and ammunition to the rebels who have been proven multiple times to be in bed with Al Nusra and sometimes even Isil/Daesh. Doubt me? Take a flight to Syria, speak to the people of Aleppo, Damascus and figure out. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;There are many points I can intellectually debate with you and utterly defeat your false arguments and fake claims. Perhaps you have been heavily misinformed, if so, I have sympathy for you. lt;br/gt;Please dont sit in an arm chair and publish reports that do not correspond to reality. I challenge you to visit Russia/Crimea/Chechnya/Syria and speak to the people there and verify your facts for yourself. May the truth set you free!
      Reply
      1. M
        MiLady
        Jan 17, 2017 at 9:46 am
        Ms. Iyengar, the western hysteria around Mr. Putin is not grounded in reason. If Russia tried to influence the elections in US, then it has not done through bribing or hacking the vote tally. At best you can agree only on lobbying. Now contrast this to millions that flowed into Clinton foundation coffers from foreign govt and the way the best democracy in the worlds uses gerrymandering techniques for elections. Even then nobody expected Mr. Trump to win and he did lose the por vote. In that Clintons own mistakes and the broken collegiate system of US is to blame. Its hard to argue that Putin is the reason the working cl is so angry with the establishment or he coerced the defeated candidate into using private servers or that he provided Clintons the questions beforehand during the CNN debate. If a reality TV star now holds the codes to the nukes, its because the US politics is run by oligarchs and spin doctors, not Mr. Putin.
        Reply
        1. K
          Karan Khanna
          Jan 17, 2017 at 7:52 am
          Radhika Iyengar,lt;br/gt;You have simply copied verbatim the BBC Doentary on Vladimir Putin.lt;br/gt;Your headline "Why is the world’s attention focused on Vladimir Putin" has absolutely no explanation in the article.lt;br/gt;Expect much more out of an Indian Express Reporter
          Reply
          1. B
            Bhai Yetohadhai
            Feb 16, 2017 at 6:42 pm
            I have to double check that I am reading an Indian paper not any US.How can someone write so confidently based on at best second hand sources.Reflects very poorly on Indian express.
            Reply
            1. K
              Kiran Kumar
              Jan 17, 2017 at 2:16 pm
              Completely One sided, looks like a copy paste from some CNN reporter. Not an objective view.
              Reply
              1. M
                Maratha King
                Jan 17, 2017 at 7:59 am
                This article is written with only one intention - "Smear PUTIN's Image" and Propaa of western Image of HIM...Purely nonsense article..lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Radhika Iyengar -- Learn the facts and take break from writing such useless and biased articles.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Never write your opinion as an article - Tell the facts
                Reply
                1. K
                  Kerala Warrior
                  Jan 17, 2017 at 8:07 pm
                  Radhika Iyengar, in swallowing the western main stream media narrative you are just regurgitating BS. It makes sense that CNN writes BS. They stand to gain directly. What the do you gain out of propagating one sided ? Look at it from the point of a Russian reading this. You are up Rus-Indian relation- something which we shall need when our friend of the moment- US, packs up.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments