India’s Rafale deal is leaving China rattled: Here’s why

India bought the 36 jets in a deal worth 7.8 billion Euros this month.

Written by Kanishka Singh | New Delhi | Updated: October 3, 2016 10:36 am
Rafale deal, india Rafale deal, india rafale deal china, india rafale deal rattles china, france Rafale deal, india france, Rafale deal india france, Rafale fighter aircraft, narendra modi, francois hollande, 36 rafale combat jets, modi hollande, hollande modi, india news The deal comes with the clause of 50 per cent offsets, which will be a bonanza for the domestic industry as it will lead to business worth at least 3 billion Euros and creating new jobs in India.(Representational image)

India’s move to buy 36 French Dassault Rafale jets has raised anxiety in India’s eastern neighbour China. State-run Global Times carried an article recently highlighting China’s worries about India’s increased military strength and how the nuclear-capable Rafales will add to India’s nuclear deterrence capability.

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar commented on Sunday that India may start getting the jets a little earlier than planned. It highlights the urgent need for India to secure its borders with dominant fighter aircraft which offer nuclear deterrence capabilities. Furthermore, the Rafale, which will come equipped with the Beyond Visual Range Meteor Missiles, adds an edge to the Indian Air Force over China’s and Pakistan’s. Dassault has promised to deliver the full lot within 66 months with the first delivery planned at 36 months from the signing date. The Rafale squadrons will be able to attack enemy targets without even crossing into the enemy’s territory.

India bought the 36 jets in a deal worth 7.8 billion Euros this month. The IAF chose the Medium Multirole Combat Aircraft Rafale over competitors Saab Gripen, Lockheed Martin’s F-16IN fighting falcon, Boeing FA-18IN and the Eurofighter typhoon aircraft.

The Global Times article also raised alarms over the increasing arms imports in Asia from the ‘west’. Chinese experts have expressed concerns about the Rafale deal and several commentators and policymakers contend that India will deploy the squadrons across her eastern and western borders to counter Chinese and Pakistani threat. Chinese interests are best met if its neighbours remain weak and subservient. However, India’s resurgence on the global strategic arena and increased bonhomie with the US has put China on the backfoot and it finds itself in a quandary on countering India’s growing strength.

Pointing fingers at the arms exporters in the ‘West’, the paper also claimed that western exporters were not interested in helping the growth of India’s arms manufacturing industry. China itself is one of the major arms exporters. However, its own FC-1 and J10 aircrafts have been beaten in arms deals across the globe on several counts. The paper claimed that one of the reasons for India’s and other Asian arms importers’ heightened acquisition spree was the hyped China threat ‘pushed’ by the West.

China has played the big brother to Pakistan whenever a conflict between India and Pakistan has sparked. China’s indirect support to Pakistan, in terms of military aid and the increased presence of Chinese troops on India’s borders, is a cause for concern and India will want to curb any impending threat as signs arise of a rattled China.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. T
    Ttaas
    Oct 2, 2016 at 11:25 pm
    That's AAP
    Reply
    1. R
      Raaa
      Oct 2, 2016 at 11:32 pm
      Because China does not have any similar aircraft and its all fighters are lower version and not capable to fight against it. They ordered some su35 but this one is ahead of su 35 and but we can get more developed in India that will be good and generate employee
      Reply
      1. P
        Prateik
        Oct 2, 2016 at 9:14 pm
        It has been recognized as even Israel is stronger than India, right barb-Aryans?
        Reply
        1. T
          Tipnis
          Oct 2, 2016 at 2:12 pm
          I see many indo-ARYAN patriots who call themselves nationalists are defending France as if it were their fatherland. It is a fact that Aishwara Rai was the deal breaker in the Rafael deal. We all know she was MADE TO MEET Francois Hollande when he visited India. What was the purpose of that?
          Reply
          1. T
            Tipnis
            Oct 2, 2016 at 11:52 am
            It has been proved many times that you are a brahmin. Liar!
            Reply
            1. N
              Nodi
              Oct 2, 2016 at 7:22 pm
              And of course Ashesrya Rai's visit every month to Paris( to over see the hand over of jets, accompanied by barb-Aryans)
              Reply
              1. N
                Nodi
                Oct 2, 2016 at 8:49 pm
                Are you justifying the decision of Aishwara Rai who was the deal breaker in Rafael deal or are you justifying the D IF Rafael company?
                Reply
                1. N
                  Nodi
                  Oct 2, 2016 at 7:19 pm
                  JOURNALISTIC TERRORISM!
                  Reply
                  1. N
                    Nishant
                    Oct 2, 2016 at 2:43 pm
                    Don't try to disprove the indo-aryan theory. It has been proved to be true. The living evidence is all there in the atude of barb-ARYANS.
                    Reply
                    1. N
                      Nishant
                      Oct 2, 2016 at 2:18 pm
                      How is that even stanis know so very well about brahmins.
                      Reply
                      1. N
                        Nishant
                        Oct 2, 2016 at 2:36 pm
                        Modi ordered her. He and she probably did not even inform her family. Modi and his cronies know their business very well, right?
                        Reply
                        1. N
                          Nishant
                          Oct 2, 2016 at 2:16 pm
                          What is wrong in Making Aishwarya Rai meet Hollande? It is the tradition of Indo-Aryans. That is how they could capture empire after empire. That is what Chanakya did.
                          Reply
                          1. N
                            Nishant
                            Oct 2, 2016 at 3:15 pm
                            By you. Your introduction of differentiation through caste system. Your practice of untoucheables. Your practice of Aryan pimpery.By your killing of Dalits. And of course your brazen defense of ARYANs right now.
                            Reply
                            1. N
                              Nishant
                              Oct 2, 2016 at 3:16 pm
                              By you. Your introduction of differentiation through caste system. Your practice of untoucheables. Your practice of Aryan pimpery.By your killing of Dalits. And of course your brazen defense of ARYANs right now.
                              Reply
                              1. N
                                Nishant
                                Oct 2, 2016 at 4:10 pm
                                Which species would present a woman, that too a married woman, because she has attractive features, to a forensic dignitary unless that species is the most filthiest in the universe?
                                Reply
                                1. N
                                  Nishant
                                  Oct 2, 2016 at 4:08 pm
                                  You mean to say you are not an Aryan?
                                  Reply
                                  1. M
                                    MyTake
                                    Oct 3, 2016 at 8:26 am
                                    China is fully and squarely responsible for weaponisation of India. If China backs off stan, this and only this can put a halt to India moving fast in its weaponisation program. Plus China should not come in the way of India addressing the terrorism issue with stan. It's a no brainier for China to support stani terrorists only becasue it does not want India to move ahead. Ball is in China's court.
                                    Reply
                                    1. M
                                      MyTake
                                      Oct 3, 2016 at 8:44 am
                                      There are few anchor points of democracy in the world. India by its very nature of its existence is one of them.lt;br/gt;It s only by helping each other, democracy as a w can win, in addition to individual countries becoming winner in their own right.
                                      Reply
                                      1. M
                                        MyTake
                                        Oct 2, 2016 at 10:01 pm
                                        World's stability lies in supporting peaceful rise of any country, however strong that country may be. lt;br/gt;Countries that are not willing to subscribe to the notion of peaceful rise of a country, should be challenged when it is still not late.
                                        Reply
                                        1. V
                                          Vivek
                                          Oct 2, 2016 at 11:13 am
                                          CPEC is Bing built over bodies of poor balouchs with Pak had selling out entire Balochistan for few bucks when these people rise and throw away shakels of fear then what will happen to this project is anybody guess
                                          Reply
                                          1. Y
                                            Yasar Malik
                                            Oct 2, 2016 at 12:55 pm
                                            Both India and stan should learn from there past mistakes. War, fight or having more arms does not help any country. lt;br/gt;Both countries have same problem poverty and corruption, they should fight this and not war. Shame on leadership of both countries.
                                            Reply
                                            1. Load More Comments