ICJ order on Kulbhushan Jadhav decoded: It’s actually a win each for India and Pakistan at The Hague

Sushma Swaraj tweeted her gratitude to India’s counsel at the Hague, who had argued that there was significant concern that Pakistan’s military court would have executed Jadhav in the dead of night.

Written by Jyoti Malhotra | Updated: May 18, 2017 5:05 pm
Kulbhushan Jadhav, ICJ, ICJ verdict, India, Pakistan, Hague, Harish Salve, ICJ stays Kulbhushan hanging, Kulbhudhan Jadhav ICJ, Kulbhushan Jadhav ICJ hearing, ICJ news, Kulbhushan Jadhav news, India news Kulbhushan Jadhav.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered that Pakistan stay the execution of Kulbhushan Jadhav, thereby handing a big diplomatic victory to India, but has also stopped short of ruling on the issue of consular access to Indian embassy officials in Pakistan for Jadhav, thereby allowing Pakistan to save face at the ICJ’s interim verdict.

External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj tweeted her gratitude to India’s counsel at the Hague, who had argued that there was significant concern that Pakistan’s military court would have executed Jadhav in the dead of night, and that therefore, the ICJ should rule against such a heinous act.

“I assure the nation that under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi we will leave no stone unturned to save #KulbhushanJadhav,” Swaraj tweeted.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi confirmed to journalists at the Hague that no consular access would be given to Jadhav, pending a final verdict. Meaning, Indian embassy officials still won’t have any idea what Jadhav’s physical and mental condition is since he was kidnapped from Iran over a year ago.

The ICJ threw out the Pakistani plea that it had no jurisdiction in this matter because it was different from Pakistani law. The ICJ argued that according to the Vienna Convention, to which both India and Pakistan are signatories, it indeed had jurisdiction. Therefore, that plea didn’t hold.

Pakistan had argued in front of the ICJ that a 2008 consular agreement between India and Pakistan superceded the Vienna Convention, as all cases of security or political prisoners would be decided on “its merit.”

Because he was such a security and political prisoner – a spy – Pakistan argued, the merit of the case in this case meant that it would not give Indian embassy officials consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav. Pakistan argued that Jadhav had been caught waging war against the Pakistani state or its equivalent, and was involved in acts of sabotage in Balochistan and elsewhere.

That is why, Pakistan argued, that he had been sentenced according to the law of the land, and that sentence was hanging.

India’s simple argument rested on the Vienna Convention, which guarantees consular access to all its citizens. It argued in front of the ICJ that it was fearful that Jadhav’s life was in danger. To that extent, India has won a big victory, because the ICJ has clearly told Pakistan that it cannot hang Jadhav until a final verdict.

As this 1-1 score, in favour of both India and Pakistan, sums up the Jadhav case so far, one cannot help wondering if the entire matter could have been sorted more amicably.

Whatever Kulbhushan Jadhav’s actual status – whether or not he’s a spy, as Pakistan says he is and India denies that fact, insisting he was a businessman in Iran, carrying out his normal chores – the fact is that he was kidnapped by Pakistani intelligence agencies from Iran. He has since been kept in a jail somewhere in Pakistan.

If Indian and Pakistani officials could pick up the phone and talk to each other, and sort out this problem bilaterally, it would have been so much more humane. At the end of the day, to wash our dirty linen in public, was ugly, even grotesque. To think that two neighbours can descend to this state diminishes us all.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. R
    Ramesh
    May 20, 2017 at 6:48 am
    "If Indian and stani officials could pick up the phone and talk to each other, and sort out this problem bilaterally, it would have been so much more humane." The authors seems to live in fools paradise. If things were so simple, there would be no conflict between India and stan.
    Reply
    1. G
      Gopal Sriniwasan
      May 19, 2017 at 11:10 pm
      If Indian and officials could pick up the phone and talk to each other, the problem could have been solved bilaterally.To think that two neighbours can stoop so low diminishes us all. What a sweet word of sentiment from a frustrated Punju who is on a vacation from reality. Jyothis heart beating for stan is understandable because she is a member of the cozy club which bene ed from a lot of freebies and therefore Jyothis's frustration and rant is understandable. If things between Indian and stani officials was so simple as made by this Punju, why was Sarabjit so mercilessly killed despite the officials knowing his life was in danger and what Jyothi and her ilks in the Cosy club do to save Sarabjit's life? Sarabjit was a poor farmer and his life did not merit Jyothis conscience but since PM Mody and the BJP have taken a strong stand against s Jyothy has resorted to a propa a to please her ISI Bosses sitting across the border
      Reply
      1. A
        Arvind viswanat
        May 19, 2017 at 6:31 pm
        Pick up the phone and talk ?!? I wonder what Jyoti is smoking! The discomfort at the present situation of a party in power coupled with blind hatred for Modi compels one to stoop to such levels reveals starkness of human character. It is possibly the first time we have witnessed an Indian Government standing up for its citizen in an International forum. If this cannot be seen for what it is and masked as a tie under the guise of snooty English reeking of privilege, we can only say that she is more to be pitied than censured. For I.E. turning fast into irrelevance, the choice of columnists needs a serious rethink.
        Reply
        1. G
          Ghulam Nabi
          May 19, 2017 at 1:51 pm
          Now that a laudatory comment has been accepted and published byIE, without asking for avalid email, doesn't it expose your bigotry
          Reply
          1. G
            Ghulam Nabi
            May 19, 2017 at 1:41 pm
            What a victory for India!!! Thanks to cricketers Sehwag & Kaif !!!
            Reply
            1. Y
              Ya
              May 19, 2017 at 3:03 am
              This is called, equal-equal---anti national writer
              Reply
              1. K
                Kuldip Bamzai
                May 19, 2017 at 12:18 am
                How can you put India and stan at par in this case, it shows your inadequacy.This order of ICJ was an interim one, which happens to be totally in agreement with India's stand based on Vienna convention.An order on consular access may follow, as the case proceeds.Got it !!
                Reply
                1. R
                  Rohit Chopra
                  May 19, 2017 at 12:10 am
                  I feel pity for disoriented and delusional people like this author who always try to accommodate any thing ranging from mischief to terror attacks to such farcical trials by blood thirsty generals of stan, and we are both same. How we are same? Just because you gave some friends eho feed you biryani ? And how the it is 1-1 ? So many times those lu natics they turned down request for consular access and you are talking of picking up the phone?? What kind of re tards we have. God bless Jhadav and he should be back in India.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments