Hey politicians, leave those kids alone

A few days ago BJP led government, which may or may not win award for promoting free speech, reviewed through Niti Ayog and rime Minister’s Office, as many as 114 autonomous institutes as part of first phase of the planned review of 679 institutions.

Written by Sunanda Mehta | Published: June 25, 2017 9:41 am
FTII, Film and Television Institute of India, FTII cinema, BJP, Niti Ayog, FTII row, FTII courses, indian express news, india news Big Brother has begun to watch the goings-on at FTII and from all accounts, it is missing the big picture

Time was when the country’s premier film training school, the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII), was in news for all the right reasons, from the best experimental cinema coming out of its classrooms to its alumni making an impact internationally. Today the beleaguered Institute is making headlines not just for all the wrong reasons, but also because of the several questions surrounding it.

A few days ago the BJP led government, which may or may not win award for promoting free speech, reviewed through the Niti Ayog and the Prime Minister’s Office, as many as 114 autonomous institutes as part of the first phase of the planned review of 679 institutions. Of the 114 they scanned, nearly a third have been selected for reduction, reorganisation or corporatization.

That the FTII is way up on the list is hardly surprising to those who have been following the hapless school’s vicissitudes over the past couple of years, centering on the government’s audacious attempts at imposing control and a desperate struggle by its students to retain their independence.

The worst, of course, was the strike in 2015 which lasted140 days and defied all logic and large-heartedness that a government must employ when it comes to dealing with students. The students stance was clear, they did not want the new chairman of the governing council as they deemed him unfit for the post. The government’s position, on the other hand, was shrouded in mystery; it dug in its heels and refused to budge, leaving everyone nonplussed at its obstinacy.

Many shouted out the words – privatisation, corporatization, saffronization.  Arundhati Roy talked about the strike in her book, `The End of Imagination’. “The students wanted to know why a chairman with no qualification for the job could be foisted on them. They demanded that Chauhan be removed from the post. Their real fear was that by stacking the governing council with their cohorts, the government was setting up a coup, preparing (for the nth time) to privatise the FTII and turn it into yet another institution meant for the rich and privileged,” she wrote.

As it turned out, their fears weren’t off the mark.

Debates have begun to rage on what privatisation means for FTII, how it will slow down the entry of raw talent from the country’s peripheries, how cinema, as well as FTII graduates, will become more amenable to accepted norms rather than allow the seed of rebellion flower into free thought.

My question is, Why can’t the government leave alone an institute that has not only unexpectedly served its purpose but which has pushed the boundaries and become a hotbed of international appreciation and acclaim? Why try and fix something that does ain’t broke, as the Americans would say?

Certainly, what needs fixing is the infrastructure, restoration and preservation of some of FTII’s heritage structures, including the iconic Prabhat Museum, the thought-through creation of a more structured syllabus and time table which doesn’t allow so many backlogs, the division of labour between a bureaucrat and a film industry person at the top (since that debate remains inconclusive) and a talented, committed and well-paid faculty that is more involved in cinema than petty politics.

What does not need fixing at FTII is its free spirit, it’s out-of-the-box thinking, its rebellious streak or the maverick lifestyle of its denizens. This is what has given the school its identity, its air of unbridled creativity. The likes of Adoor Gopalakrishnan, Naseeeruddin Shah, Girish Kasarvalli or Resul Pookutty could only be Made in FTII. Diploma films made by its students are today creating more waves at international film festivals than those from the industry.

You don’t muzzle an institution like this. In fact, you grant it greater autonomy to iron out the creases and repair what is wrong, not destroy what it’s been doing right all these years.

With privatisation, though, the goals are set to change. These include commercial sense and playing to the gallery (read government). The wheels have already been set in motion.

Quick short courses with a substantial fee have been rolled out, attempts are being made to revise tuition expenses which is bound to make the place unaffordable for many and there are reports that FTII students will have to get the approval from the authorities for films they want to screen and watch in the institute’s theatre.

Big Brother is definitely watching. But it seems to have missed the big picture.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. Shambabu Shende
    Jun 26, 2017 at 6:05 pm
    Safronisation, corporatistion, authoratisation must be STOPED.FTTI IDEN Y must be retained. More infrastructure, artistic, creative facility made available, FTTI-FILM industry-Ad world-govt.ministry,department-corporate-sportworld-NGO-international agencies liasion parti tion be saught to offer multiple creativity avenue to student. Student capacity programme capacity may be improved. More FTTI-DELHI school of Drama alike ins ution opened at Regional centre's to facilitate local talent.
    1. T
      Jun 26, 2017 at 9:31 am
      Humm....I beg to differ "there is no limit to Imagination" and no government is ever capable of suppress them.
      1. Seshubabu Kilambi
        Jun 25, 2017 at 7:57 pm
        Everyday is not sundatpy ...right wing will not be able to control ideas for long ..n ftti
        1. K
          Jun 25, 2017 at 5:43 pm
          A new world class AC LNB Rail Coach (Made in India, which is now being used in premier trains) costs about 2 Crores India there are about 50,000 Rail Coaches.If we have to replace all of them with B new AC World Class coaches it will cost about 1 Lakh Crore and in 5 years give employment to over 1 Lakh people regenrate local economies and modernism Indian rail's (one part) for next 15 years (at least).All that at the cost of Rs 1 lakh Crore over Five years.Now consider, 650 of these ins utes,even if government is spending 100 Crore each year, it is about 65000 crore each year!WHAT FOR? YOUR INTELLECTUAL SCHIT? If I was in Government, I would have packed them already.
          1. K
            Kunal Chandra
            Jun 28, 2017 at 8:26 am
            Perspective Mr Kg, perspective. Intellectual and cultural capital is a important component of a country's soft power, and the question here is not about 650 ins utes, but about the few relevant ins utes being targeted for shut-down/corporatization, despite already providing results, cultural and artistic value, as well as international standing. We are talking only about a few crores here, not the thousands of crores you seem to rant about. It is important to preserve the good while doing away with the unnecessary. Money is a medium, not the end goal, and cannot be used to justify every aspect of our democracy. The fact that you don't care about "intellectual " is sadly a reflection on our country's mono dimensional education system. Intellectual or artistic conscience/value is a much needed democratic virtue to counter the forces of capitalist overdrive and fundamentalist anarchy. Remove it and watch the country descend into a spiral of ignorance and conditioned violence.
          2. Vinu Krish
            Jun 25, 2017 at 5:38 pm
            Cleansing of ins utions from Marxist and other anti-national elements should have been a priority of Modi Govt. Better late than never...
            1. Load More Comments