The EU and the UN are pressing hard for a lasting ceasefire.
Akal Takht jathedar defuses HSGPC controversy while new Haryana governor rushes in unwisely.
Europe has learned how to remember its wars. India has a long way to go.
Instead of blocking TFA, India should use WTO moment to push for domestic agricultural policy reform.
BY : RUHEE NEOG
North Korea went to polls earlier this month to elect deputies to the unicameral Supreme People’s Assembly. The state-controlled Korean Central News Agency proclaimed the elections a resounding success, and reported a 99.97 per cent voter turnout (apparently, those missing were either at sea or on foreign tours). These elections take place every five years, and voters have the democratic right to choose the one candidate nominated per constituency. These nominees are vetted and selected by the Democratic Front for the Reunification of the Fatherland, a coalition of four parties in which the Korean Worker’s Party is unofficially, but naturally, preeminent.
While the elections are, as such, unexceptional — a rubber-stamp parliament does not merit any heavy investigation — they are useful indicators to understand North Korea’s distinctive political landscape, as determined by the leader of the time.
These elections were keenly observed by Korea watchers, to the extent possible, for significant changes in leadership — the likely follow-up to the execution of Jang Song-thaek in December 2013. It has been observed that while there seems to be a generational shift, with older legislators being edged out by relatively young replacements, there is no mass purge as was initially anticipated.
It is also important to note that this leadership reorganisation did not happen swiftly. While it may seem to belie logic and establish Kim Jong-un as an unpredictable leader, there is a certain rationale to the apparent inconsistency. The reshuffle is a logical next step in an attempt to consolidate power and establish the uniqueness of Jong-un’s leadership.
Jong-un succeeded his father, Kim Jong-il, after the latter’s sudden death in December 2011. Jong-il had assumed complete control as head of state over some years, and not directly upon the death of his father, Kim Il-sung, in 1994. This despite the years that went into his training. Jong-un had had little training when greatness was thrust upon him. Establishing himself as the “Great Successor”, in the fashion of his forebears, required more work. Most importantly, he had to contend with indications of dissension from the regime’s foremost instrument of authority — the military.
Jong-un therefore started weeding out the “undesirables” soon after he assumed power. The first signs of the regime heading towards change were prompted by the dismissal, in 2012, of the North Korean army chief of general staff, Ri Yong-ho, from all posts held by him. He is thought to have been removed to downsize the role of the military in state affairs, over which it is known to have a firm hold. This was a significant development, especially because he was one of the chief advocates of Jong-il’s “military first” (songun) policy. Yong-ho’s removal was followed by a slew of other significant military dismissals.
Then, of course, there was Song-thaek’s execution in 2013, which was especially continued…