The false binary

Why the world doesn’t buy Pakistani claims of India-sponsored terrorism

Written by Khaled Ahmed | Updated: February 27, 2016 12:05 am
pakistan, pakistan terrorism, india terrorism in pakistan, pakistan terrorists, india terrorists, indian terrorist attack, pakistan terror attack, pakistan terrorist attack, pakistan news, india news Pakistani Prime Minister’s Adviser on Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz.

Pakistan finally ended up owning the acts of terrorism committed in India from its soil when, on February 22, it went public through Sartaj Aziz that at least one call made by the terrorists was traced to the Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM) HQ, the covert-warrior outfit in south Punjab. There was widespread relief that Islamabad had finally decided to stamp out terrorism in the province. Is there hope in it for an Indo-Pak détente?

Pervez Musharraf said on a Dunya TV discussion on January 31 that the 1999 Sharif-Vajpayee meeting in Lahore had failed to mention Kashmir. Those watching the talkshow could have drawn the inference that one reason Nawaz Sharif was deposed that year was the fatal “omission” of Kashmir. That same day, on the same channel, PM Nawaz Sharif tackled the “Kashmir” shibboleth with a statement that could be Pakistan’s new approach to peace talks. He said what he couldn’t in 1999 and during the military rule: “The Kashmir issue can be resolved only when Pakistan is stable and prosperous. The world will listen to us if we are internally strong. China couldn’t have received back Hong Kong if it was not stable and prosperous.”

But Musharraf got more hits on social media when he said Pakistan was amiss in not announcing to the world it was India, in cahoots with Kabul, that was doing terrorism in Pakistan, killing schoolchildren and university graduates. He recalled that as president he had once insulted current Afghan President Ashraf Ghani at a meeting in Ankara.

In office, Musharraf had refused to accept the Afghan Taliban leadership was being “kept” in Quetta while the Americans tried to pacify a country they were desperate to leave. Kabul ran with the line from their secret service that Mullah Umar was conducting the savage terrorism from inside Pakistan. Musharraf dramatically rebutted the charge and said the Taliban phone numbers in Quetta provided by Kabul were bogus. Last year, as news of Mullah Umar’s secret death surfaced, most Taliban-watchers thought the enigmatic one-eyed leader could have been living all the while in Quetta or Karachi. Mullah Akhtar Mansoor, who leads the Afghan Taliban today, is still reportedly based in Quetta.

Most “military analysts” counter India’s charge of state-supported terrorism from Pakistan by saying India does the same in Pakistan via Afghanistan. They refer to “other unfriendly states” walking in lockstep with India to destabilise Pakistan. Nobody misses the swipe at the US still doling out funds to Islamabad for fighting its war on terror.

There is in evidence an unspoken theory of “balanced” bilateral state-operated terrorism. Why is India complaining about Mumbai, New Delhi, Pathankot, etc, when it’s doing the same all over Pakistan, from Karachi to Peshawar? Nobody outside Pakistan is willing to accept Pakistan’s binary of “we both do it to each other”.

There are not-so-subtle differences. They are so unsubtle, one wonders why Pakistan wants to make it a two-way street. India alleged trained intruders from Pakistan crossed the border and caused havoc in Pathankot. Pakistan alleged India funded and trained terrorists from Afghanistan, who attacked the Bacha Khan University. Most discussants in Pakistan devoted to the binary ignored the disturbing fact that a leader from Indian Kashmir, known to be living in Islamabad, owned the Pathankot attack. The government arrested the JeM’s Maulana Masood Azhar to break from its practice of going into denial.

Is Pakistan finally coming out of its trance because the non-state actors it banked on have turned against it? Is it ready to break the fake binary of bilateral terror? Many opinion-makers now write bluntly about the pantomime enacted by halfwit police IGs blaming al-Qaeda-related terrorism in Karachi on India. When India complains, it’s against Pakistani terrorists like Masood Azhar and Ajmal Kasab it arrests on its own soil. When Pakistan refers to the December 2014 Army Public School massacre, it accuses its own national, Mullah Fazlullah, “as funded by India”. Then Pakistan looks outside and finds nobody believes it.

There’s reason to assume PM Nawaz Sharif overtly and army chief Raheel Sharif, less overtly, are now determined to talk to India without the revisionist posture on Kashmir — allowing it to be a part of the long-term Indo-Pak agenda, and pulling out of the globally unacceptable binary deception of “India doing terrorism in Pakistan”. Despite Islamabad’s early knee-jerk dictum that the Pathankot dossier is “flawed”, messages to India from the US and France were quite clearly not ready to bite. Nor was anyone in Pakistan inwardly convinced.

The writer is consulting editor, ‘Newsweek Pakistan’

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Ajitdada
    Feb 27, 2016 at 1:42 pm
    Just because of states suious dealings with rogue groups have created a distrust among many nations about stan. People from stan are now facing the discrimination everywhere they go. Isn't this unfair ? stan still siding with Taliban shows how deep the rot is, inseparable bedfellows. Last 2 years most of the deportees from west were stanis. stan's image is tarnished by the state itself. The day dream of parity with India have put the state on the verge of Bankruptcy.
    Reply
  2. D
    Dipti
    Feb 27, 2016 at 3:15 am
    stanis are notorious worldwide for being shameless lairs. Hindu stanis in the BJP like Smriti Irani are trying to compete.
    Reply
  3. H
    Hypocrite
    Feb 27, 2016 at 1:31 am
    Nothing is going to change unless and until the Porkis disown the original terrorists, Jinnah and the seventh century father of Islamic terror.
    Reply
  4. J
    Jemma Thomas
    Feb 26, 2016 at 10:22 pm
    Writer is very thorough in his very simple message to the thick heads in Pak. India has Pak terrorists from pak and citizens of pak ,trained and armed by state insution of pak in their custody either alive or dead, and their actions are recorded and watched by the world and victims are including other citizens. So this is black and white for the entire world since their citizens are the victims as well. Pak says India is destabilising their country while the perpetrators that they have in custody are their own citizens who have come from third country and not from India. None of these people ever confessed to have been funded by India or received training from Indian insution or a call from any of the Indian citizen. In fact it turns out to be that these terrorists are trained and funded by Pak insutions expecting that they undertake their act against India but the monsters turned against their own master due to ideological differences with in these master/ servant relationship. Even stray dogs are bit better because they don't bite the feeding hand. Unfortunately here we are talking about a culture who genetically tuned to double game gamblers. They are in the name of religion and ideology gambling away their kids future.
    Reply
  5. B
    BharatK
    Feb 27, 2016 at 12:06 pm
    stan is the Head Quarter of Worlds Jihadi terrorism. The w world knows it. Every terror attacks anywhere in the world, have stani link. Perhaps not many knows, there are no direct flights to stan from any western countries. stan itself its own enemy.
    Reply
  6. M
    Murthy
    Feb 26, 2016 at 9:44 pm
    Khalid Ahmad Bhai looks at issues much more deeply than most journalists, imo. Here he is asking why no third country, including China, has accepted stan's binary view on terrorism ? stani journalists in general propagate interpretations favoured by their Army and ISI. They do not report the close involvement of Pak. Army officers in training the terrorists of LeT and JeM. Indian Media is freer than the Pak Media insofar as it WILL report if there is any hanky panky by India promoting terrorism in stani soil, especially, if it involves the killing of civilians and, worse, children. Above all, the Taliban have grown up hating India, why would they want to listen to India in attacking Baccha Khan University and other targets?
    Reply
  7. M
    mast kalandar
    Feb 27, 2016 at 10:41 am
    @Dipti - YOU surely must be a MUSLIM and STANI in the guise of a HINDU!!!
    Reply
  8. D
    DK
    Feb 27, 2016 at 1:08 am
    stan is mainly fooling its own people. Keep its citizens in fear, rally them around a common enemy and justify the huge role of its Military....all of these various needs are met by making baseless accusations. It is a land of conspiracy theories and you can use such theories to fit a square peg in a round .
    Reply
  9. Load More Comments