When Putin blinked

The Russian president got a lot wrong in Ukraine.

By: New York Times Written by Thomas L. Friedman | Updated: May 30, 2014 8:04 am
Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russian President Vladimir Putin.

There was a moment at the height of the Cuban missile crisis in October 1962 when Soviet ships approached to within just a few miles of a US naval blockade and then, at the last minute, turned back — prompting then-Secretary of State Dean Rusk to utter one of the most famous lines from the Cold War:  “We’re eyeball to eyeball, and I think the other fellow just blinked.” The crisis in Ukraine never threatened a Cold War-like nuclear armageddon, but it may be the first case of post-post-Cold War brinkmanship, pitting the 21st century versus the 19th. It pits a Chinese/ Russian worldview that says we can take advantage of 21st-century globalisation whenever we want to enrich ourselves and we can behave like 19th-century powers whenever we want to take a bite out of a neighbour — versus a view that says, no, sorry, the world of the 21st century is not just interconnected but interdependent and either you play by those rules or you pay a huge price.

In the end, it was Putinism versus Obamaism, and I’d like to be the first on my block to declare that the “other fellow” — Putin — “just blinked”. In fact, I’d like to say more: Putin got pretty much everything wrong in Ukraine. He thought the world was still shaped by “spheres of influence” dictated from the top down, when Ukraine was all about the emergence of “people of influence” — The Square People, organised from the bottom up and eager to join their own sphere: the world of liberty and free markets represented by the EU.

Putin underestimated Ukrainian patriotism; even many Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine did not like pro-Putin thugs trying to force them to join Russia. And, most of all, Putin underestimated the impact of Western economic sanctions. The world turned out to be more interdependent, and Russia more exposed to that interdependence, than Putin thought. So he blinked. The first flutter was pulling back his troops from Ukraine’s border and letting the election proceed. Because Putin’s aggression in Crimea has spurred Europe to reduce its dependence on Russian gas, Putin rushed to Beijing to conclude a natural gas supply deal with China. The price China extracted is secret and experts “suspect Putin dropped the price of gas significantly for China in a desperate manoeuvre to ensure a steady cash flow for Gazprom in the face of sinking revenue and Western sanctions,” The Washington Post reported. Let’s add it up: Putin’s seizure of Crimea has weakened the Russian economy, led to China getting a bargain gas deal, revived Nato, spurred Europe to start ending its addiction to Russian gas and begun a debate across Europe about increasing defence spending. Nice work, Vladimir. That’s why I say the country Putin threatens most today is Russia.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. J
    Jawed Akram
    May 30, 2014 at 9:02 pm
    Its not like as you have sufficed yourself in praising US interdependency,imposed sanctions that would curtail Russia economic growth and hegemony of Obama,in particular. Even Merkel has dissenting views of EU which goes against Putin's riposte against Ukraine crisis as Germany heavily dependent upon Russia's gas and energy exports. He did exactly what a patriot do to save his/her homeland. Crimea, gifted to Ukraine in 1956 by the,then Army chief on a condition Crimea would remain autonomous self functionary. Crucial myth behind the annexation was to procure safely Naval base in Sevastopol where its historic and beleguered Black sea fleet lies. Similar acts has had been too orchestrated by the US to save and instil new bases around tie world. I have a suggestion for you. Gather some guts and write something productive of Intifada and brutalities meted out to palestinians,Afghanis et al. Btw, West must be ready to witness the regeneration of USSR. A boisterous event to feign by.
    Reply
  2. V
    Vitor Leur
    May 30, 2014 at 2:13 am
    Who is the author of this nonsense article?
    Reply
  3. J
    jimbojamesiv
    May 29, 2014 at 7:15 pm
    You're blinded by your war-mongerism and wrong about everything.
    Reply
  4. L
    lazerbenabba
    May 29, 2014 at 10:16 pm
    Whenever you have an "Aparatchik" brought up and evolved into the service of a dictatorship, that individual is permanently scarred with the belief that "Might is Right", ignoring the basic fact that it is only so when backed up with a belief in the rightness of the cause, not just opportunism.The opinion piece so correctly identifies the very real and obvious mistake made in his delusion of resurrecting the USSR in his imagination.Putin succeeded in Georgia and up to now in the Crimea but I believe that he has now got a bad case of indigestion.
    Reply
  5. M
    m m
    May 29, 2014 at 7:19 pm
    Obamaexpress article.
    Reply
  6. N
    NarendraVKumar
    May 30, 2014 at 11:07 pm
    As you know too well world is flat. Flatness implies a small tilt can be a major tectonic change. No! Putin did not blink. He stood witness to hypocrisy and double deals. He showed how pretenders behave given a little pep. You know what I mean...
    Reply
  7. S
    sacchadesi
    May 30, 2014 at 1:18 pm
    British came as traders too singing songs about free trade and in the name of the same free trade made every one else their slaves. Wolf in sheep's clothes. What makes Mr Friedman think only west is capable of that and when east does it its the worst of all crimes?
    Reply
  8. S
    sanju sanju
    May 30, 2014 at 4:28 am
    putin is awesome.....and u can suk my balls got
    Reply
  9. Load More Comments