US AND TALIBAN
The confusion over the US talks with the Taliban in Qatar last week suggests that the so-called endgame in Afghanistan may not really be at hand. Barely hours after the talks were announced,the Taliban broke the agreement by flying its flag and presenting itself as the legitimate government of Afghanistan. Afghan President Hamid Karzai was furious,and Washington is now saying that Talibans Qatar office will be closed if it does not abide by the terms agreed in the pre-negotiations.
Visiting US Secretary of State John Kerry sought to reassure New Delhi that it was not about to abandon Kabul,cut a deal with the Taliban,and hand over Afghanistan to the Pakistan army. While Delhis anxieties are understandable,the Indian debate on US policy towards Afghanistan and Pakistan in the second term of the Obama administration has been over the top.
What the recent developments point to is the growing uncertainty about the future of Afghanistan. It would be unwise for Delhi to prejudge the outcomes at this stage. Only two things are certain at this moment. One is the fact that the America is determined to end its combat role in Afghanistan by 2014. US President Barack Obama has repeatedly declared that America cannot be locked in a perpetual war. India or the rest of the world cannot alter that decision.
What remains open are two questions. How many troops should the US leave behind? And how long should the US extend military support to Kabul? It is reasonable for Delhi
to assume that the answers to these questions will depend
on the ground situation in Afghanistan and the political conditions in Washington.
The second certainty is the US interest in engaging the Taliban to find a political settlement as the troop withdrawal takes place. Translating this objective into reality has proved to be a serious challenge,as the recent fiasco in Qatar has shown. The coming weeks and months will see more confusion as the major actors in Afghanistan,including Washington,Kabul,the Taliban and the Pakistan army jockey for position. Instead of protesting at what others are doing,Delhi should prepare to play the few cards that it has in the increasingly uncertain Afghan situation.
KERRYS RED LINES
In his public remarks in Delhi,Kerry seems to have added to the confusion when he reaffirmed some red lines in the engagement with the Taliban breaking with al-Qaeda,renouncing violence,and respecting the Afghan constitution,including the rights of women and minorities. Thus far,those conditions have not yet been met,so there is no negotiation at this point, Kerry said. If the conditions are met,then there is a negotiation that will take place not with the United States,but with the High Peace Council of Afghanistan.
The Washington Post,however,says Kerry might have wrongly stated the current US position. The Obama administration has for some time said these three principles were outcomes from successful negotiations rather
The White House announced the talks,betting that the Taliban had shown enough flexibility by promising not to support international terrorism and supporting Afghan democracy. But before the first continued…