Understanding Dalit assertion

The reluctance to accept the community’s social, economic and political empowerment must change

Written by BHALCHANDRA MUNGEKAR | Updated: June 7, 2017 6:00 am
Dalit, Saharanpur clashes, Narendra Modi New Delhi: Dalit women during ‘Maha Sangram’ rally. (Source: PTI Photo)

The anti-Dalit violence in Saharanpur district of Uttar Pradesh does not augur well for the Narendra Modi government that came to power with the slogan, sabka saath, sabka vikas. The violence reportedly started with the dominant Thakur community preventing the Dalits in Shabbirpur village from installing a statue of B.R Ambedkar at the Saint Ravidas temple on the occasion of Ambedkar’s birth anniversary, though they had got the necessary permission from the authorities. The Dalits could not reconcile with this outrage. Therefore, when the Thakurs took out a procession to celebrate the birth anniversary of Maharana Pratap, they opposed it. The Thakur community treated this act of resistance as a challenge and took to violence. Dalit houses were torched, their cattlesheds ransacked, and belongings destroyed. Two Dalits were killed; one of them, a 22-year-old, while returning from a public meeting addressed by Mayawati. The Yogi Adityanath government has taken some action. Some persons who attacked the Dalits returning from Mayawati’s meeting have been arrested and the district magistrate and SP of the district suspended. However, the atmosphere is tense and peace remains elusive.

When one examines the anti-Dalit violence in India over a period of time, the four northern states of UP, Bihar, MP and Rajasthan, popularly known as the “cow-belt” states, top the list. As per the National Crime Records Bureau statistics, the total number of crimes against SCs in the country in 2010 was 32,643, of which UP accounted for 7,522 (23 per cent). The number of crimes increased to 47,064 in 2014, in which UP’s share was 8,075. Though  its share in the national tally fell by four percentage points to 17 per cent, it continued to top the list. UP’s share declined because crimes against SCs increased in MP and Rajasthan.

Clearly, Saharanpur is not an exceptional incident. However, the implications of the anti-Dalit violence need serious consideration. First, this reaffirms that caste constitutes the “basic structure” of Indian society. Though its pervasive influence has somewhat weakened due to the spread of literacy and education, the development of the means of communications and transport, urbanisation, upward occupational mobility of various backward castes, notably the SCs and the STs, due to affirmative action, notions of caste superiority and prejudices and ill-feelings against the Dalits are largely preserved. However, due to the slow progress of these material development indicators, such a mindset is more dominant in the “cow-belt” states compared to the southern states of Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala.

Second, the rationalist anti-caste Dravidian movement initiated by Periyar E.V. Ramaswamy in Tamil Nadu and Narayana Guru’s reformist movement in Kerala set the tone for social change in the south in the 20th century. The “cow-belt” states have not experienced any radical progressive social movement in this period. Swami Dayanand Saraswati’s Arya Samaj focussed on the supremacy of Vedic culture, which only reinforced the rigidity of caste-based hierarchy. This explains why cow vigilantism is largely confined to the “cow-belt” states.

Third, caste-based hierarchy, to use Ambedkar’s words, created “graded inequality” that gave a sense of caste superiority not only to the intermediate castes such as Thakurs, but also to many OBCs. Though this is a pan-Indian phenomenon, it is more pronounced in the “cow-belt” states. Fourth, caste remains the most influential factor in India’s electoral politics, particularly in rural areas, more pronounced in the “cow-belt” states’ rural locales. The anti-Dalit violence in Saharanpur reveals that despite the lip-service paid to Ambedkar’s legacy by the upper and intermediate castes and the OBCs, he remains for many just a Dalit leader. Our political class has failed to convince the masses about Ambedkar’s great contribution towards the making of modern India.

Until about four or five decades ago, the Dalits would meekly surrender to the wishes of the so-called upper-castes in social, economic and political matters. This is no longer true. Access to higher and professional education has enabled horizontal and vertical social and economic mobility for Dalits. It has led to the creation of a class of writers, professionals, administrators and entrepreneurs within the Dalit community. This new class has started to refuse the conventional social stigmatisation and subordination of the Dalits by the upper castes. Ambedkar’s movement of Dalit liberation created a sense of confidence and assertion in the community, which in turn enabled it to overcome traditional feelings of defeatism. Dalit literature played an important role in sharpening confidence.

This Dalit assertion has started posing a challenge to the age-old hierarchy-based supremacy of the upper and intermediate castes and even the OBCs. The latter are finding it increasingly difficult to accept this new Dalit assertion as it threatens their various interests. Protests by students at the Hyderabad Central University in the wake of the suicide of Rohith Vemula, who faced caste-based harassment, Jignesh Mewani’s mobilisation of thousands of Dalits over the flogging of five Dalit youth for skinning a dead cow in Una, Gujarat, and now, mobilisation by the young lawyer Chandrasekhar and the Bhim Army at the Jantar Mantar in the national capital, are examples of Dalit assertion that seem to have upset casteist sections. These protests till now have been peaceful. One wishes that they would continue to be so.

This article is not meant to evaluate the Modi government’s three years in office. But a highlight of this period has been the rise and spread of intolerance across the country on one excuse or an other. Self-appointed vigilantes in social and cultural fields are destabilising a fragile social equilibrium. The sense of insecurity in society calls for Prime Minister Modi’s intervention.

The writer is former member of the Rajya Sabha and Planning Commission

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Ahmed
    Jun 7, 2017 at 11:08 pm
    India and Indians from long ages never objected to the rise of any one section of any society. It evident right from the kings like chandragupt a D and wadiar a bc to Today's PM he too come from a lower caste of the society. If an individual who rises above and shows his leadership the country has always stood with him. Except in post independence Nehruvian dynasty era where the actual person in profession will never be given right le, like illiterate college dropout Nehru was called pundit just because he belonged to a cast and Ambedkar who an actual research scholar was never called pundit. This was because the caste-ism was embed by brits which congis kept it alive for their self interest so they can become new ru cl and rest india divided on cast lines. Bloody sickulars always look and find ways to fish in troubled waters. By the way I my self a proud Dait I know good future but siculars will not let is move ahead.
    Reply
    1. A
      Amit Singh
      Jun 8, 2017 at 1:30 am
      Nehru was trained lawyer from england. Wrote 2 books discovery of india and glimpses of world history. Read them before cal him illetrate.
      Reply
      1. A
        Amar Akbar
        Jun 8, 2017 at 2:55 am
        Nehru failed his bar exam in England. He lost the elections of Congtess President twice. A looser became our PM and someone else Ghost wrote those books. So get your facts straight.
    2. E
      Employ Ment
      Jun 7, 2017 at 9:28 pm
      💲💲मुफ्त रोजगार योजना💲💲 ✔मोदी जी द्वारा चलाए गए डिजिटल इन्डिया से जुड़े और कमाए हर महीने 15,000 - 50,000 रुपए ✔अब कोई नही रहेगा बेरोज़गार और नही करेगा कोई बेरोज़गार आत्महत्या ✔क्योंकि अब आ गई है 21वीं सदी की सबसे बड़ी रोज़गार क्रांति ✔हमारा सपना पूरे भारत को ही नही पूरी दुनिया को डिजिटल इंडिया से जोड़ना 💲सबका साथ सबका विकास💲 ➡शुरुवात कैसे करे ✔C.h.a.m.p`C.a.s.h को प्ले स्टोर से इन्स्टल करे, और साइन अप करे, $1 डॉलर बोनस स्पौन्सर ID: 468942 ➡चैलेंज को पूरा करे ➡और इंकम करनी शुरू करे 👇🏻इसे जरूर नोट कर ले👇🏻 स्पौन्सर ID: 468942 ........................ Ugsghduhdjjddk
      Reply
      1. A
        Ash
        Jun 7, 2017 at 9:15 pm
        Reservations and denial of merit are the root cause of why we have not progressed.Provide free schools and education but let merit decide how far you go up the ladder.By allowing students who score 6 marks in Maths or physics a seat in IIT is a waste of precious resources.And how does this student cope later.Is it surprising that they can't cope and industry now claims that nearly 60 of IIT graduates can't be utilised.What a mess.These elite ins utes were created for the smartest, and today we might have had more advances if we had had No reservation for IITs.As a beginning this step should be enforced.No more reservations for promotions.All promotions should be based on merit. It's not surprising that there is friction between dalits who are getting free handouts by the govt and the Thakur's who don't get the benefit of reservation.We have only seen the start of these clashes.
        Reply
        1. S
          Samanya Admi
          Jun 7, 2017 at 8:01 pm
          The empowerment can only be achieved by equal opportunity and financial support to the economically deprived (that exist in all communities) and NOT doles at the cost of merit. In a globalized and compe ive world, the current system of reservations and quotas is anti-thesis to the idea of very existence of India. Mediocrity breeds more mediocrity and corruption. It is about time that India does away with reservations and quotas and replaces it with "equal opportunity for all" to help create a balanced and compe ive society that make the nation progress and compete in the 21st century world. Equal opportunity for one and all. Jai Hind.
          Reply
          1. S
            Seshubabu Kilambi
            Jun 7, 2017 at 7:50 pm
            The rise of atrocities indicates the state of the country even without deep evaluation
            Reply
            1. T
              Tom
              Jun 7, 2017 at 7:26 pm
              "pervasive influence has somewhat weakened due to the spread of literacy and education, (which directly led to) upward occupational mobility of various backward castes" - veiled as it may be atleast someone wants to acknowledge what those `child abusing' padris did in bringing education to the masses, while the learned pandits continued to chant for thousands of years... never heard more un-grateful drivel in this country, just because one has access to the do ented sins of clerics & clergy while the honourable courts twist and turn facts and let the conniving babas off the hook.
              Reply
              1. S
                Suleiman Haq
                Jun 7, 2017 at 6:43 pm
                Let the paper get its facts correct. The Chamars attached a procession of Thakurs in which one Thakur boy was killed. The Chamars had no right to take law in their own hands. If their statue was prevented it was not by kil their people but by legal procedures. And this cannot be the justification to kill a Thakur boy. In the retaliation the Thakurs set fires to home but no one was killed. It was only later that one Chamar boy was killed. Both kil s are wrong but to say Thakurs were wrong is equally wrong. This is nothing but a potent tactics to again spread casteism after the effects of Mandal commission have evaded
                Reply
                1. T
                  TRP
                  Jun 7, 2017 at 6:35 pm
                  Actually the southern states should just throw away their backward ideas and education and accept the `higher cultural values' of the cow-belt - that way atleast the sh it ty treatement to certain sections of society will achieve uniformity in this country; And oh wow everybody wants to comment but nobody wants the share the real picture of our country!
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments