The ripple effects of Wave 2014 will change the economic and political landscape forever.
The results of several opinion polls, large and small, reliable and questionable, all point to one conclusion: a Narendra Modi wave. Of course, they could be wrong, and we all know how such polls missed the emergence of a new party on the Delhi scene. But several, indeed all, opinion polls pointed to a Modi wave in the three other states that went into elections in November-December 2013 — the large states of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh.
The poll forecasts were spot on, albeit with a slight miss on the Modi wave in each of the three states. Overall, the track record of these polls in India is pretty good, and if there weren’t occasional surprises along the way — like the 2004 Lok Sabha election — one would be forced to conclude that opinion polls actually did affect the vote!
So, with these opening caveats, let me assume that the opinion polls (about 10 of them, including one by a respected foreign polling agency, Pew) have got it right. What do the results mean?
Since elections are fought on a coalition basis, most opinion polls report vote shares for the two major parties, BJP+ and (Congress) INC+. One back-of-the-envelope calculation is to subtract about 3 percentage points (ppt) from BJP+ to obtain the result for the BJP and about 4 ppt from INC+ to obtain the result for the Congress. Doing this, the median poll result is 31 and 19 per cent for the BJP and INC alone, respectively (see table). The joint vote share of the BJP and INC will be close to 50 per cent, a level that all election results since 1984 have centred on (average of 51.5 per cent).
The table reports the average of seat results emerging from individual state-level vote shares. These in turn are derived from considerations about the economy — for example, it is the economy which determines voting, a model reported repeatedly in these columns and a Headlines Today TV programme in December last year — and about age, caste, religion and urbanisation at a parliamentary constituency level, as well as historical vote shares and opinion poll estimates. As is well known, there is a variety of models to convert from votes to seats in a first-past-the-post system and three very different methods were employed.
This will be an election for the record books. It will record the largest vote share decline for the Congress in its entire history, matching, if not exceeding, the 9.2 ppt decline in 1977. The gain for the BJP, some 13 ppt, will be the largest-ever swing for any major national party in Indian history.
Now for the more difficult, but likely, implications of these vote shares. Record three will be the lowest-ever Congress seat tally (79) and record four will be a BJP-alone win of 245 seats, exceeding by 13 seats the 232 seat total of the Congress in the May-June 1991 election (post the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in May 1991).
The pre-poll alliance share of the BJP will easily exceed the 272 required for a majority in the 543-seat Lok Sabha. The Congress alliance seat total is likely to be significantly lower than the lowest-ever seats acquired by the Congress alone — 114 in 1999.
What is happening? Just look at the election debate and you will find out. Secularism and the great communal divide? Steadily diminishing as a talking point, and by the time the first vote is cast, it would have gone the way of caste, yes caste. While important for sociologists and intellectuals and the Yadavs and TV commentators, there is precious little evidence that caste affects voting behaviour at any serious aggregate level.
If changes in caste voting patterns do occur in 2014, then they will favour the first lower caste prime ministerial candidate, Modi. And Hindutva — gone from TV screens, gone from the discourse and gone from thinking. Certainly something to be proud of, amidst the gloom and doom, that is India today.
If actual results are broadly in line with the forecast made here, then politics and economics in India will be changed for ever, and surely for the better. Here is why and how.
First, the results will herald the end of the Congress party as we know it. It would spell the end of the Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty, and along with it have a spillover impact on other political dynasties. They will be forewarned about the end of dynastic politics, whether they are from the winning NDA alliance or the losing UPA formation. The foundation for a meritocratic politician, exemplified by Modi’s rise, will be laid.
If the meritorious among the Congress, for example Nandan Nilekani, also win, then we can look forward to a healthy two-party political framework in India. This does not mean that regional parties will end, but it does imply that their days as a major coalition force would be numbered.
In most democracies, the electoral fight is between two parties and, invariably, the two parties are defined around economic beliefs. Occasionally, a third party emerges with a specific issue or agenda and gains popularity; for example, the Green parties in Europe.
These parties have a lot of value-add, so much so that their ideas soon become mainstream, that is, the one-issue-based parties get co-opted into the policy and political framework, provided, of course, that they are not anarchist. There is every reason to expect that this record-setting 2014 election will mean a radical shift towards the norm, that is, basically a two-party system.
The new left-of-centre party would comprise of the left faction of the existing Congress (sans dynastic leaders) and disgruntled Congress voters who voted elsewhere. Regional caste-based parties, for example those headed by Lalu Prasad, Mulayam Singh Yadav, quasi-socialist in views, plus the intellectual left, will join forces with this configuration.
If dynasty ends in the Congress, a parallel development would be a reduction in the influence of the RSS and outdated religiously symbolic concepts like Hindutva. Growth, development, federalism and equality of opportunity (not reservations) will likely be the new agenda of the economic right.
If Modi obtains a reasonably comfortable mandate, as the data suggest, then important questions arise: Will he be a strong leader intolerant of divergent views? Unlikely, since today there are enormous checks and balances in place for any leader, anarchist, authoritarian or otherwise.
And what about the Godhra riots? Modi has been cleared of all involvement by the Supreme Court; nevertheless, the riots did happen under his watch and as such, it is a permanent blot on his record. However, Modi’s clean, strong and consistent development performance speaks for itself, and with no riots post-2002. Perhaps, by aiming to deliver development and welfare improvement for all, Modi is seeking redemption for what happened in 2002? The opinion polls, the wave, suggest that there is chemistry at work; the voters of India are bonding with Modi, are willing to move past Godhra and move forward to a new and better future under his leadership.
The writer is chairman of Oxus Investments, an emerging market advisory firm and contributing editor,
‘The Indian Express’
- The little-revenue tax
LTCG is a bad idea. The best policy for the taxman is one that maximises revenue, not one that maximises his morality, or his employment,…
- Revolution and regression
Tax buoyancy has helped the government to budget for schemes that make transfer of revenues to the bottom third of the population possible. There was…
- Smart policies for redistribution
India can, and must, reform its welfare system. More efficient redistribution is desirable for ethical and political reasons..