The post-dengue prognosis

The steady state efficiency of healthcare needs to be raised so that crises like this one can be avoided.

Written by K Srinath Reddy , N R Narayana Murthy | Updated: September 22, 2015 12:23 pm
delhi dengue, dengue deaths, delhi dengue deaths,dengue death toll, dengue death toll delhi, dengue death record delhi, dengue delhi, dengue deaths delhi, delhi news, india news An MCD Fumigation Worker at work in the old quarters od Delhi on monday. Express Photo by Tashi Tobgyal New Delhi 140915

In any free society where terrible wrongs exist, some are guilty; all are responsible.” While these words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel ring true for many social and political ills that appall us, they are also a timely reminder of our collective responsibility to correct the pathetic state of public health in our country. Accepting the failures of a dysfunctional health system with passivity or being pacified by reflexive responses to any crisis, while ignoring the crying need for systemic reforms, makes us all responsible for the poor health indicators that place India behind our South Asian neighbours, other BRICS nations and, for some indicators like child immunisation, sub-Saharan Africa.

There is justified outrage at the tragic deaths of children from dengue under deplorable conditions of apathy and neglect in the capital of India. As often happens, there is an immediate search for individuals and institutions to whom the guilt could be readily apportioned. There are many who will be blamed, and will in turn point the finger at others — the state and Central governments, municipal corporations, private hospitals, public health functionaries, negligent householders and careless construction workers who let water stagnate for mosquitos to breed. Alas, all this sound and fury will abate when the virus takes a holiday in a few months, and the underlying cause — the long neglect of people’s health as a policy priority — will remain unaddressed.

The Delhi-centric national television channels have rightly vented anguish and anger over these terrible tragedies. Their gaze does not, however, extend to other tragedies that regularly visit people across India due to a health system that fails them. Buried inside a national newspaper on April 12 this year was the heartrending story of a tribal in Odisha who allegedly felt forced to sell his two-month-old son for Rs 700 to buy medicines for his sick wife. Which channel picked up that story? Each death, disability or disrupted life that could have been avoided by effective prevention or early and appropriate healthcare should be a blow against our conscience. But, alas, they do not afford us the voyeuristic excitement of a high society murder.

Back to dengue. This virus is no stranger to Delhi, or many parts of India, which are endemic (favoured residence) to it. Yet, each monsoon season, we react as though it is a stealth bomber catching us by surprise. We are familiar with all four strains. Often, viruses tend to transmit rapidly as the human host population increases in size and density. This can portend future danger for big cities. Mosquito vectors breed merrily when afforded the safe sanctuary of stagnant water from intermittent rains or careless collections in homes. Mosquito breeding will become even more intense as temperatures rise with climate change. We should be prepared to combat dengue, malaria, chikungunya and other diseases of that ilk with better design and delivery of health services.

This calls for well-coordinated prevention measures that link multiple civic services, government agencies and community organisations; efficient surveillance systems that help in forecasting and monitoring; and concerted clinical care strategies that intelligently draw upon the combined resources of public and private providers. Regulation is certainly needed, but it is not a substitute for planning and coordination. We do need to step up the speed and effectiveness of our crisis response but, even more important, we need to raise the steady state efficiency of the health system so that crises are avoided, or are minor at worst.

Thailand is a hyper-endemic country for dengue and experienced high numbers of deaths some years ago. It has now markedly reduced deaths from that disease through a combination of effective prevention measures and application of a standardised clinical management protocol. Tamil Nadu, too, is endemic for dengue but its well-organised public health services are geared to cope with the challenge. All of India should learn from these experiences and invest in creating health systems that prioritise prevention and promote competent and compassionate clinical care.

A key public health priority is the strengthening of both rural and urban primary health services. Whether it is the initial assessment and care of fevers, chronic care of high blood pressure and diabetes or ensuring adherence to tuberculosis treatment, frontline health services can provide most needed healthcare. Many patients with viral fevers do not require investigations and treatment at large hospitals — indeed, they run the risk of unnecessary investigations and inappropriate treatment if they do. Triage and referral guidelines will help primary care facilities to steer only the persons who need advanced clinical care to large hospitals.

The mohalla clinics proposed by the Delhi government are a step in the right direction. They should help prevent the recurrence of ugly scenes, like the lathi-charge of uncontrollable crowds who thronged the gates of the Ram Manohar Lohia hospital a few years ago, driven by media-stoked panic about H1N1 influenza.

That also underscores the critical importance of appropriate, timely and effective risk communication to the public. Well-informed citizens will not only be able to make the right decisions about the care they seek but can also be a collective community resource to practise and promote prevention. The media can be a useful ally in disseminating the right messages in a responsible way, even as it retains its role
as an independent monitor.

Public health systems cannot function as a motley crowd of disconnected actors ad libbing their way through an unscripted play in chaotic fashion. The different actors involved require a script, coordination, direction, and need to work as a team. It is time India got its act together to create strong, well-resourced, responsive and responsible health systems. Or else, terrible things will continue to happen to innocent children, expectant mothers, poor tribals, disabled persons — and to your family and ours. We will all be responsible when such terrible wrongs happen.

Reddy is president and Murthy is chairman, Public Health Foundation of India.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. G
    G M
    Sep 22, 2015 at 8:27 pm
    The saying, "Prevention is better than cure" is the key to negotiate the crisis. If all stake holders put their act together, crisis can be handled. Saying is easier than doing. Question is whether we have anything in us to offer?
    1. D
      Dr OP
      Sep 22, 2015 at 12:40 pm
      Very well Said. I appreciate the criticism and the gaps identified. In an informal chat with many doctor colleague working in the government system, they also place larger emphasis on prevention than panicky management later on.
      1. Nilmani Singh
        Sep 22, 2015 at 8:55 am
        Health system is poorly equipped to tackle epidemics particularly in northern states.Even quality of MCH services is poor M.P PS Mr.Pravir Krishna tried to improve health services through system strengthening there is lot of improvement in basket of services as well as quality of services.Most important building blocks in India is lack of leadership in health and nutrition sector in India in general and particularly in northern Indian State . ASHA and AWW are responsible for village level outreach services but due to lack of proper handholding and monitoring support they are not able to perform their work properlyterpersonal communication is most effective tool for information sharing but most of government use m communication for information sharing ,Even now 15 to 20 % people are leaving in media dark area.So there is need plan properly with following principle of social justice with equity.
        1. G
          Girish Kumar
          Sep 22, 2015 at 8:30 pm
          Dr Srinath Reddy always fails to focus on the huge need for govt funding in India which spends only as much as the least developed countries of Myanmar, Afghanistan, Chad, Guinea and stan and together form the lowest spending countries in the w world of 150 countries. How can India spend so little only for health and none of the so called experts including Dr S Reddy not demand huge increases?! This is the shameful situation that is another cause for the sorry state of Indian public healthcare system. We are indeed a little bit happy that Indian Medical ociation has just now become bold enough to ask for 4 % gdp spending by Indian govt for public healthcare. I hope all experts will focus on the terrible starvation of funding which is itself a huge deterrent to improved functioning of govt health insutions. Jai Hind. Long live the Pink Revolution of Healthcare in India demanding 10 % GDP allocation for health in India by the Indian govt. Please google and sign this epeion to help force more funding in healthcare as any good govt should do.
          1. R
            Ramesh Grover
            Sep 23, 2015 at 8:50 am
            It is an insightful write up. The idea of Mohalla clinics sounds weighty and is likely to be fruitful. It should be tried out in all affected or exposed areas.
            1. Load More Comments