The Paraskar syndrome

Only cadre officers, that is, those who have been absorbed into the IPS, can hold certain jobs like SPs in the districts.

Written by Julio Ribeiro | New Delhi | Published: August 11, 2014 12:08 am
police_m The system of rotating postings is meant to avoid the accumulation of vested interests.

There are some aspects of “L’affaire Paraskar” that must be understood and digested by the people of Mumbai. They have heard of police reforms and they have understood those reforms to mean increased manpower, better training, better equipment, polite behaviour and professional competence in tackling crime and criminals. Everyone wants the police to be more polite in their dealings with the people and more professional in their work, but people must realise that this is possible only if there is an honest and competent leadership that is installed at the cutting edge and at the very top. These leaders should be allowed operational freedom to direct their men in the daily performance of the tasks entrusted to them.

L’affaire Paraskar should open people’s eyes to the fact that the police force that is supposed to serve them is spending precious time on private pursuits and, that too, by misusing the authority vested in them by virtue of their office. Sunil Paraskar could allegedly dare to indulge in what Mulayam Singh Yadav has called the “boy’s game” because the fear of reprisals for bad behaviour is no more present in a policeman’s mind. Every police officer has a pipeline to some politician or other. And it is the politician and not the professional police leader who has the last word in disciplinary matters!

Paraskar, I learned, had many godfathers. He hardly ever moved out of Mumbai city during his entire career. His one posting to Nagpur was short. His Herculean efforts to return to Mumbai quickly succeeded. In the past, no officer was inducted into the city unless he went through the grind in the districts. This writer did 15 years in different districts like Broach, Kolhapur, Nasik, Jalgaon, Parbhani, Nanded, Sholapur and Pune before he was appointed deputy commissioner in Mumbai. After four years in the city, he was sent on a six-year deputation to Hyderabad and Delhi before returning.

The system of rotating postings is meant to avoid the accumulation of vested interests. The government is aware of these pitfalls and makes the correct noises from time to time but never acts because of pressures exerted by sundry politicians on their minister friends. Most police officers have perfected the art of cultivating the correct patrons to ensure their continued stay in places of their choice.

To neutralise this process of politicisation of the force, where policemen and politicians keep scratching each other’s backs, the National Police Commission of 1979 had recommended certain measures to ensure that postings and transfers were not left in the hands of politicians alone. This essential reform has been rejected by all political parties. Each party wants to control the police for its own political advantage at the cost of the rule of law. Unless the power to post and transfer is removed from the hands of the politicians, there is no chance of any improvement in the delivery system and no silver lining to be seen for the common man.

Another fact that is not known to the general public, but closely connected to this whole gamut of patronage politics, is the direct recruitment to the senior ranks through the State Public Service Commission and not through the Union Public Service Commission, which recruits IAS and IPS officers. These state recruits, whose number is increasing alarmingly, are absorbed into the IPS after eight or 10 years.

Because there are so many of them to be accommodated when they are due for promotion, new not-required, nondescript posts are created at senior levels. Many senior posts have no job content and constitute a burden on the exchequer. What is worse is the bitterness and infighting that arises because each wants what they themselves call “creamy postings”, where illegal money can be made.

Only cadre officers, that is, those who have been absorbed into the IPS, can hold certain jobs like superintendents of police in the districts. This rule is being widely disregarded in order to accommodate the state officers who are very often related to politicians by blood or through community linkages. This results in significant distortions in the way the force is run and administered.

In the old days, only one or two officers were recruited directly as deputy superintendents of police every year. Their calibre was very high. Now the state has been known to absorb even 50 or more in a year, making a mockery of the process of cadre management. The politicians will have distributed patronage thereby, but the people ultimately suffer. L’affaire Paraskar should open their eyes.

The writer, a retired IPS officer, was Mumbai police commissioner, DGP Gujarat and DGP Punjab, and is a former Indian ambassador to Romania.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. C
    Mar 17, 2015 at 5:05 pm
    IAS and IPS Officers who connaive with the Politicians? whom and where the author keeps. The problem with the so called senior and seasoned officers of past that when they were in office acted as mute spectators for dwindling affairs. Now, a voice is raised from call of consciousnesses. The Socrates virtue: to live was to focus on the pursuit of virtue rather than the pursuit.
    1. K
      keshav kumar
      Apr 17, 2015 at 8:01 am
      I dare to differ with the author on State Commission vs UPSC recruits. State commission recruits more of the domiciled candidate who have better understanding of ground realities than UPSC cadres who came to know about state through vague reports (if he/she is of another state). Perhaps misappropriation of State commission recruited cadres by politician is malaise needed cure. On any count IAS and IPS cadre are more susceptible to political patronage than the other way around.
      1. A
        Aug 12, 2014 at 7:53 am
        It's such a myopic understanding of police force that Mr Ribeiro has which makes him write article after article based on same so called IPS and IAS sancy. Are we still living in some colonial era or what. Please Sir come out of this British hangover. We are a modern democracy and not some British colony to be administered by British created services. The ever touted national police commission talks of making a constable rise to the highest rank in police force. Can we also hear on that very often from you Sir instead your oft repeated line and syndrome of blame it on nexus.
        1. T
          Aug 11, 2014 at 4:03 am
          A good article but a few measures that common man can take to change the police force would have made it 'actionable'.
          1. T
            Aug 12, 2014 at 7:30 am
            Author deliberately gives an impression that SPS officers getting Cadre posts and personal conduct of any officer are related issues. To start with at present no NON IPS is heading a District. If Direct DY Ss P coming in large nos. is reason for so called decline in their quality the same logic applies to IPS as even they are coming in large nos. Also author gives an impression that only state cadre officers use political pressures where is reality is that many officers of IPS are also guilty of that. Author gives an impression that state cadre officers are getting IPS in 8 to 10 years then it is plain wrong. Today it is taking close to 20 years for a Direct Dy. s. P. to become an IPS. Never ever cadre review is done on time. I wonder why the same author has never written about that. One wonders why author even drags up an issue of SPS officers getting a district ( which itself is not true as of now, even in the past it has been done rarely ) while commenting on an alleged personal conduct of a certain officer, and then you remember that the officer in question has been a former Direct Dy. S. P. Am I seeing a bias where no exists. Can we call it "The Ribeiro Syndrome "!
            1. Load More Comments