The Fanatic Mainstream

In a divided social milieu, ‘sabka saath, sabka vikas’ is an idle fancy.

Written by Abdul Khaliq | Published: December 7, 2015 12:09 am
winter session, parliament session, parliament swinter session, lok sabha, lok sabha quorum, lok sabha adjourned, india news, latest news, parliament news, A view of Parliament House on the eve winter session in New Delhi on Wednesday. (Source: PTI photo)

Our founding fathers, conscious that our pursuit of being a strong, united and civilised country hinged on caring for one another, had underlined fraternity as one of the cherished values in the Preamble to the Constitution. I grew up at a time when we were still celebrating our social solidarity and common humanity premised on the doctrine that every human being has the right to justice, equality, security and dignity. “Unity in diversity” was the shibboleth by which we defined our rich heritage. Sadly, our resolve to be a just, humane society has crumbled under the weight of the fault lines of bigotry, bias, violence and dehumanisation. In the last three decades, every pillar of our democracy has been systematically undermined.

The happenings of the last two months are a revealing snapshot of our spiritual bankruptcy and intolerance. In today’s India, Sangeet Som and Azam Khan hold greater sway than Mahatma Gandhi. Their deviant, hate-soaked ranting is not an aberration but symptomatic of fanaticism going mainstream. We have become indifferent to questions of right and wrong as everything has been reduced to a point of view.

A truism is defined as a statement so self-evident that it’s hardly worth mentioning. So inured to injustice have we become that we missed the irony in our erudite vice president’s recent plea to ensure the right to life, irrespective of religion. Such an appeal would be platitudinous in a truly egalitarian society, but it’s a timely exhortation in our context. We delude ourselves with the consoling thought that most of us believe in tolerance and peaceful coexistence. But that is cold comfort when one considers that rumours of the sighting of the carcass of a pig or cow are sufficient for hundreds to spring from nowhere to kill and burn. In frightening Taliban-style, anything that smacks of blasphemy can invite death. Ask the rationalists.

Our country is the hotbed of a million mutinies. Schismatic tensions, widening inequalities, ethnic bigotry and the monochromatic interpretation of our cultural diversity are tearing us apart. There are myriad combat zones revolving around xenophobia (Bangladeshis), racism (ask our brothers in the Northeast), gender discrimination, casteism, affirmative action, regionalism — all of which have diminished our claims to being a humane society. Our collective failure to transcend narrow parochial thinking and reach out to the “Other” is at the heart of the corrosive violence, exclusion and injustice. Our inability to embrace cosmopolitanism is the root cause for the pervasive communal virus that poses the greatest threat to our future and, if unaddressed, is bound to do us all in. What makes it particularly potent is the perception that it now comes armed with authority and legitimacy.

To heal and redeem us, we need a messiah. But what we have are cynical politicians who have exacerbated social tensions. A non-political friend gave me a fascinating insight on how a totally discredited political class is actually inimical to the causes it espouses. He watched a heated TV debate on the threat to freedom of expression. So long as writers and social commentators held forth they were winning the argument, but the moment Kapil Sibal weighed in on their behalf, their carefully deliberated criticism seemed to lose its sting and get transmuted to mere partisan objections by pseudo-secularists. Given his former political affiliations, even the president’s iterated sermons on tolerance were viewed with suspicion. Is it any surprise that the ordinary Muslim squirms at the chest-thumping machismo and competitive bigotry of the Owaisis and Azam Khans?

Instead of the clichéd binary of pseudo-secularism versus pseudo-nationalism, we need a new grammar that judges all actions against the template of humanism. The meaningful Hindustani term “insaaniyat” should be the animating principle informing all social discourse. For such a transformation, we need to revive and sustain the post-December 16 gangrape revolutionary spirit. A just and equal society cannot be built unless the main stakeholders — the silent majority — again step forward. Only then can democracy rediscover its egalitarian essence.

The writer, a former civil servant,  is secretary general of the Lok  Janshakti Party. Views are personal

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

More From Abdul Khaliq
  1. Haradhan Mandal
    Dec 7, 2015 at 2:45 pm
    Well written article! But how does it help with Lok Jana shakti party being a part of NDA?
    1. K
      K SHESHU
      Dec 7, 2015 at 5:12 pm
      When every politician knows that the society in India is anything but 'secular', what is the use of the word secular? The people are secular most of he time: it is the politicians who hobnob with many words and phrases and one of them is 'secular'. If the politicians stay away from people for most of the time, the people will always be 'secular' in letter and spiritn..!
      1. I
        Indian First
        Dec 7, 2015 at 7:22 am
        Sudhirji please note that Owaisi, in particular Asaduddin, never spreads hate against hindus. Yes, he always talks about the muslim empowerment, whether in his public addresses or in the Parliament. I agree with you that his younger brother once crossed the line, and subsequently paid for that...Whereas, the Sadhvis, Aditnath, girirajs talk openly against muslims...
        1. R
          Dec 7, 2015 at 7:12 am
          "Is it any surprise that the ordinary Muslim squirms at the chest-thumping machismo and compeive bigotry of the Owaisis and Azam Khans "...... What do you mean? I have never heard a single Mullah condemn anything Owaisis and Azam Khan says. They always praise them, or they blame Hindus. Show me one statement from a major Mullah criticising either of them.
          1. V
            Dec 7, 2015 at 5:19 am
            Article is very nice and ofcourse logical too. But my dear friend Abdul ji... The best solution lies in reforming islamic theology which gives place to no one except Islam and even if it gives some space then it is of second cl "dhimmi". Second I don't agree that in the name of humanity Bangladeshi infiltration must be allowed. This will jeopardize our future generation. All have their country. Muslims demanded separate country and they parioned India. Now same Muslims wish to infest India too. Where will Hindus go then? All over the world we are watching how much "humanity" Muslim society shows to so called "kaafirs". You may be a moderate sirji but many among you community dream of caliphate and sharia law. I agree that there are Hindu fanatics too but their percentage in Hindu community is far lesser than in Muslim community and that too as a reaction to radicals like Owaisi and Muslim league in Kerala. So it would be best that the lesson of humanity be taught to Muslims first. You have wrongly attempted to place Hindu radicals and Muslim radicals in the same plate. Hindus radicals are far lesser radicals than Muslim radicals. Kindly don't try to distort reality by mixing little bit truth in blatant lies. Thank you.
            1. Load More Comments