Terror, Virtually

Internet has become a recruitment ground for terror. Global action is needed

Written by Madhavi Goradia Divan | Published:June 23, 2017 12:13 am
terrorism, online terrorism, internet and terrorism, terror on internet, london bridge attack, theresa may, google, social media, global internet regulation, shreya singhal, In the aftermath of the London Bridge attack, British Prime Minster Theresa May called for a clamp down on internet companies which she held responsible for providing a safe space for extremist propaganda. (AP/File)

In the aftermath of the London Bridge attack, British Prime Minster Theresa May called for a clamp down on internet companies which she held responsible for providing a safe space for extremist propaganda. The call for control of the internet, the most accessible and democratic medium for exchange of ideas, raises free speech concerns. More so if it means that private players like Google and Yahoo are to be entrusted with the task of weeding out dangerous content. Having said that, amidst the spate of attacks, it is hard to deny how fabulously advantageous technology has been for the propagators of hate and terror.
Attackers like those in London recently can no longer be dismissed as lone wolves. Indeed, the attacks are scattered, the methods crude and amateur. But the impact is deadly and the pattern unmistakable. This is a diabolical but brilliantly executed global war remote-controlled by the Islamic State (IS) and other extremist groups. Brilliant, because it requires no investment other than ideological brainwashing carried out at virtually no cost on the internet. The sites of attack are scattered across the world and the enemy is unidentifiable till he strikes — he does not show up in army fatigues, nor does he necessarily carry a gun. What appear to be random attacks are strung together by a deadly cocktail of indoctrination of vulnerable young men on the internet coupled with their own baggage of cultural, social or economic alienation in the societies they inhabit.

How does the world respond to this unconventional war? No amount of bombing can flatten out the nurseries of terror in the virtual world. The foot soldiers are not chaps you can “smoke out of their holes” as George W. Bush swore he would do when he declared the war on terror after 9/11. Technology has done away with the need for terror training camps. That is a great triumph for terror because it requires no centralised army, no physical or military training, no distribution of arms or explosives. The internet provides the means to expand the catchment for radicalisation and recruitment. It gives the cause a cohesiveness that transcends nationality, race and territory.

Recently, Zakir Musa, an al Qaeda operative from Kashmir, made a rousing rant on YouTube taunting Indian Muslims for being a spineless lot that had failed their brethren. Musa used social media to exhort Kashmiri youth to pelt stones, not for Kashmir, but in the name of religion. The role of the internet in providing easy avenues for radicalisation is undeniable. Yet, can the internet be regulated without chilling free speech?

While internet companies must cooperate in the fight against international terror, we need to recognise that internet service providers are not publishers but only platforms. They cannot vet the mountains of content that are posted every day. Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 acknowledges the limited role that internet intermediaries can play in filtering the flow of information by conferring on them immunity from liability with respect to third party information. In the landmark case on internet freedom, Shreya Singhal v Union of India, the Supreme Court held that an intermediary (like Google) becomes liable only if it violates a court order directing it to take down offensive material.

It would be unwise to entrust corporations like Google or Yahoo with the task of censoring potentially dangerous content as that amounts to the privatisation of censorship. Private players are not equipped to draw the fine and often fuzzy line between lawful speech and inciteful speech. They are likely to remove more material than they ought to, rather than risk liability. The result could be excessive censorship. Terrorism is a pressing global concern and it is time for the democratic world to come together to draw up a global norm, to bring about a meta-constitution to contain “terror” speech that derives sustenance from the internet. We need global cooperation through international treaties that provide for an international monitoring agency that will uphold free speech on the internet while weeding out terror propaganda.

The writers is an advocate, Supreme Court of India and author of ‘Facets of Media Law’

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. N
    NK
    Jun 25, 2017 at 7:04 pm
    Very good article
    Reply
    1. S
      Sivakumar
      Jun 24, 2017 at 12:31 am
      ₹₹ KG I appreciate your comments, you nailed it in correct point
      Reply
      1. I
        Islam Not A Religion
        Jun 23, 2017 at 11:38 pm
        It's not internet, it's kuran which Recruits terrorist through its hate ideology. Non Muslims use internet but you won't see non Muslims doing terrorism. How Brian damaged are you you sickular jihadi writer
        Reply
        1. S
          sarmad
          Jun 23, 2017 at 10:39 pm
          After the making of isis we see that cyber terrorism is on it's peak. Many i.t experts from Europe and other advanced countries coming to Iraq and middle east. These experts depicts the picture of such government which gives equal rights to all parts of society. As our governments thoughts that terrorists are present in slum and backward areas and countries so they targeted such areas. But now extremism makes it's ways in educational ins utions. Now we are fighting ideological war along with terror. Such our government must look into this matter, so we can stop it.
          Reply
          1. E
            Employ Ment
            Jun 23, 2017 at 8:56 pm
            योजना ✔मोदी जी द्वारा चलाए गए डिजिटल इन्डिया से जुड़े और 15,000 - 50,000 रुपए ✔अब कोई नही रहेगा बेरोज़गार और नही करेगा कोई बेरोज़गार आत्महत्या ✔क्योंकि अब आ गई है 21वीं सदी की सबसे बड़ी रोज़गार क्रांति ✔हमारा सपना पूरे भारत को ही नही पूरी दुनिया को डिजिटल इंडिया से जोड़ना सबका साथ सबका विकास ➡शुरुवात कैसे करे ✔C.h.a.m.p`C.a.s.h को प्ले स्टोर से इन्स्टल करे, और साइन अप करे, $1 डॉलर बोनस : 468942 ➡चैलेंज को पूरा करे ➡और इंकम करनी शुरू करे 👇🏻इसे जरूर नोट कर ले👇🏻 : 468942 ........................ Hshgdjhxdjdiicid
            Reply
            1. S
              Seshubabu Kilambi
              Jun 23, 2017 at 7:49 pm
              Technology has entered terrorism long ago. It needs lot of effort and skill to seoatate
              Reply
              1. K
                Kg
                Jun 23, 2017 at 4:03 pm
                Fighting Muslims is useless and waste of time.They are just people, doing what they feel they should do.Fight Islam.Make them feel they should not do what they are doing.How will you fight Islam?Heard that story that King's life was in a bird's neck? What is the neck of Islam? It is it's oppressed women.Empower them.Make them realize the fresh air of liberty, life and choice.It will take time.You will encounter many hijab clad "progressive" educated ones who will speak great English but will be more Islamic then men, more loyal than the King type.But they will not be able to hold their positions long and eventually Muslim women will break the chains of oppressive cult and that will make political Islam redundant, leaving only spiritual Islam in place, which will slowly be replaced and mixed with contemporary knowledge and practices,making it just like other religions of today, a private spiritual affair which has discarded what was bad in it.
                Reply
                1. A
                  Ajay G
                  Jun 23, 2017 at 5:59 pm
                  Good Comment. 👍👍
                  Reply
                2. B
                  Burman
                  Jun 23, 2017 at 3:11 pm
                  Humanity is the basis of all doctrines, in one form or the other. In present form, none of religions is complete in itself. To sa uard the tenets of humanity is one of essential pre-requisite to counter the propaganda of people like Musa. Equality of all in the eyes of Law is another essential.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments