- The Big Picture: What’s AAP
- A year later, the tweak: Desh to Dilli
- Bus from Burari laden with volunteers and hope
- Rare day out for AAP families
- Riot of support for AAP in communal hot spots
- Hunt on for CM house, will not accept Z-plus security
- No word from high command, Delhi Congress in a paralysis
- Latest News
- Second time at Ramlila Maidan: Hope overrides their doubts
- Kejriwal has no portfolio, will keep an eye on others
- In sea of white caps, BJP troika plans to be ‘forceful opposition’
- MP, MLA see Punjab as the next AAP stop
- A year later, the tweak: Desh to Dilli
- Arvind Kejriwal repeats his advice to sting the corrupt, asks police to act against ‘goondagardi’
- Proud that one of our volunteers has become Delhi CM: Anna Hazare
- Arvind Kejriwal not to keep any portfolio
- Now an Aam Aadmi Party Cola by beverage-maker inspired by Arvind Kejriwal’s party
- New chief minister Arvind Kejriwal holds meetings at Delhi Secretariat
- Cong’s Ajay Maken blames Sheila Dikshit for Delhi polls debacle
- Left, right, AAP
Rights or red herrings
In this season of the ‘aam aadmi’, Rahul Gandhi has begun his election campaign by meeting fishermen, coolies and rickshaw-wallahs in different cities. He tells them the Congress believes in ‘rights-based’ governance. He adds proudly that this is the greatest achievement of 10 years of Congress rule, and lists the right to jobs, education, food grain and information that have now been legally provided to the people of India. I have watched his wanderings with real interest in the hope that just once I might find that he has noticed that more fundamental rights remain absent from this list.
The facts are dismal. Sixty years of Congress rule and only 18 per cent of rural households have access to electricity, clean water and sanitation. The situation is the same in most cities. Only two Indian cities have regular, uninterrupted supplies of water. Thiruvananthapuram and Kota. Instead of meeting the poorest of poor Indians in sanitised situations, had the Congress’s candidate for prime minister met them in their homes, he would have seen that their malnourished children get sick and die from preventable diseases caused by the absence of sanitation and clean water. Should these rights not have come before the right to information?
Every other Indian child is malnourished and every Indian child, if it survives for three years, faces the horrible trauma of a test to get into nursery school.
Instead of boasting about the ‘right’ to education, Rahul Gandhi would do better to ask why there are not enough schools in India. Why did his mother’s government not liberate the education system from the licence raj that strangles it? This would have been as big an achievement as ending the licence raj for industry was.
Instead the Sonia-Manmohan government bequeathed us the ‘right’ to education. This has ‘achieved’ for very poor children the right to admission in their neighbourhood school, so the onus has been slyly shifted to private schools in cities. In villages, government schools are so bad that even very poor parents pay for private schools. So the priority of a new education policy should have been drastic improvement in state schools. This did not happen. What has happened is that small private schools are threatened with closure because they do not have sufficient playing fields and girls’ toilets.
Luckily for us, the right to cheap food grain has not yet been implemented or India might already have been bankrupt. Unless the next government has the courage to abolish this law, we will be anyway, because conservative estimates calculate an expenditure of more than Rs 1,25,000 crore to implement this mostly useless right. The reason why it is useless is because nearly all malnourished Indian children already have enough access to food grain. The problem usually is that they have never drunk a glass of milk or eaten green vegetables. This is why they are malnourished. If the Rs 1,25,000 crore was spent instead on feeding programmes like Akshay Patra, we may have already dealt with malnutrition and rural unemployment.
So the ‘rights based’ governance that Rahul Gandhi boasts of is mostly a sham, a huge hoax on the people of India. And there is no point in just blaming the Congress for this because the laws that have given us these rights were passed with the consent of the BJP. It is poetic justice that a BJP government may take charge after the polls.
Speaking of justice reminds me of a few more rights that should have preceded the ones we have been given. The right to justice remains a dream for the average Indian because only very rich Indians can afford to spend 20 years in court. This is why crimes like rape and murder remain unpunished for decades. Related to this is the right to policemen who work for the interests of victims of crime rather than at the behest of powerful vested interests. Even middle-class Indians know that if their daughters are raped or their homes robbed, they need to find someone powerful enough to help them register a case. And then the case can go on so long that justice becomes meaningless.
Has nobody told Rahul Gandhi that the ‘rights’ his mother’s government gave India in the past decade are mostly a chimera? Has nobody told him that this illusion of ‘rights based governance’ was created only to divert attention from the abysmal failure to provide any real achievements in education, healthcare and nutrition? If he wants to remain in the race to become India’s next prime minister, he would do well to spend some time doing homework.
The good thing though about the campaign is that, for once, every political party is talking about governance instead of communalism and secularism. That is an achievement.
Follow Tavleen Singh on Twitter @ tavleen_singh