The mind of the generals

Does religion form the core of the Pakistani identity and is it reconcilable with democracy and its institutional forms? From Pakistan’s army, a range of responses

Written by Khaled Ahmed | Published:February 18, 2017 12:00 am
Pakistan, Pakistan military, General Hamid Gul, Pakistan People’s Party, General Aziz, General Zia, Pakistan news The most interesting nugget in the book is Aziz’s reference to the “eye of Dajjal” (Antichrist) on the dollar bill, symbolising the grand conspiracy set in motion by the Freemasons and many powerful families in league with the American Neocons. Illustration: C R Sasikumar.

Writing in the Lahore-based The Nation on January 13, ex-army chief Mirza Aslam Beg vouchsafed the following wisdom: “Unfortunately democracy [in Pakistan] has been preferred over the principles of Quran and Sunnah. No government in the past or the present one, nor the conglomeration of over two dozen religious parties, ever made any serious attempt to fortify our ideological identity. We have failed to give our children their Muslim identity, because our education system is devoid of teachings of the principles of Quran and Sunnah.” General Zia, father of the new military mind, had laid down the law in 1979: “Our present political edifice is based on the secular democratic system of the West, which has no place in Islam. In Pakistan neither anarchy nor Westernism will work. This country was created in the name of Islam and in Islam there is no provision for Western-type elections.’’

General Hamid Gul was a star soldier who got to command two of Pakistan’s top strike formations besides heading the Military Intelligence (MI) and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). True to his faith rather than “a state not based on Islam”, he was unbothered by conscience when he reached out to the Haqqani Network and worked for a Taliban utopia in Pakistan. He bravely confessed having rigged the 1990 election as ISI chief to oust the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) from government. General Zaheerul Islam Abbasi tried to stage an Islamic coup in 1995 because Pakistan was “not based on Quran and Sunnah”. Gul found instant traction with the madrasa leaders, who in turn agreed with al Qaeda chief Aiman al-Zawahiri’s treatise proving how Pakistan was not an Islamic state despite the constitution and a supra-constitutional shariah court.

Another general favouring a Quran-and-Sunnah state was General Shahid Aziz who wrote a “confessional” book, Yeh Khamoshi Kahan Tak: Ek Sipahi ki Dastan-e-Ishq-o-Junoon (2013), a soldier’s story of “passion” and “madness”, which he thought suited his religious persuasion. He was no mean soldier; he saw action in Kashmir and was trained at the National Defence University before being appointed director, military operations. As major general, he headed the analysis wing of the ISI. He was director-general, military operations (DGMO) and in 1999 planned the overthrow of Nawaz Sharif’s elected government. In 2001, after 9/11, he was chief of the general staff, a post from where most officers ascend to the top job of army chief.

The most interesting nugget in the book is Aziz’s reference to the “eye of Dajjal” (Antichrist) on the dollar bill, symbolising the grand conspiracy set in motion by the Freemasons and many powerful families in league with the American Neocons. He thought whatever was happening in the world was in line with the Jewish conspiracy outlined in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a document that surfaced in Europe in the early 20th century to rouse people into a fit of anti-Semitism and resultant Holocaust. By a strange leap of logic, he thinks that the American imperium was following the programme of world domination through a shameless pursuit of sensual pleasure. “Only the Quran stands in the way of this Satanic way of life,” he writes.

General Aziz on world order: “The world order is not running by itself, it is being run according to a secret plan by a powerful secret organisation that has first conquered global banking, followed by the media and entertainment. This plan is being worked out with the help of the United Kingdom, the IMF and the World Bank, the funded think tanks and their intellectuals, big corporations and reputable universities”. And this beauty: “The bombs that kill innocent Pakistanis in bazaars and mosques are planted by friends of America, and this terrorism is done to persuade Pakistan to embrace America more closely, allow the government to pursue pro-America policies and to alienate Pakistan from the mujahideen. But this trend of support to the killers of Muslims is open rebellion against Allah.”

A 2011 book by Robert Bonney, Pakistani journalist Tahir Malik and Tridivesh Singh Maini, Warriors after War, presented thoughts of Pakistani generals. Major-General Syed Wajahat Husain said: “Jinnah emphasised a liberal, tolerant and outward-looking progressive Pakistan. Hamid Gul is wrong on the 1948 war. Jinnah never wanted it and it was abandoned after Pakistan Army Chief General Gracey and Liaquat agreed with Jinnah to call it off. The 1965 war was our mistake. Extremism and the concept of jihad were never part of the Pakistani Army”. And a bold Brigadier Shaukat Qadir, whose advice to his children was “read Bertrand Russell”, challenged the military’s fundamental tenet of war: “The military is responsible for converting a genuine movement for an independent Kashmir into a jihad — the greatest damage that we could do and did. Both 1965 and 1971 wars were acts of stupidity”.

PS: You don’t become a general talking like that.

The writer is consulting editor, ‘Newsweek Pakistan’

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. N
    NLS
    Feb 20, 2017 at 7:33 am
    These deluded, ic generals of stan will perpetually control the narrative of stani govt. on foreign policy and military doctrine and will cause more wars with India in future, directly or indirectly - whether any of those are full scale wars or miniaturized, localized wars to get stani public on their side. With the US distancing itself from stan ever so slightly after supporting the rogue nation for decades for its dubious self interest, the cunning Chinese are embracing s for their economic needs (economic corridor and access to sea port to support the export commerce). This will encourage stani generals to continue the same self-damaging/detrimental vein of anti-India war posture. How the Chinese will interlock and gel with the fanatic Islamic mindset of stani armed forces, time only will tell. As for India, it has to brace itself for endless terrorist induced cross-border violence in JandK and other states. It is a problem that will not go away until Chinese lick their wounds of failed stan policy and back out eventually, leaving stan in dire state short of financial/economic collapse.
    Reply
    1. D
      Dj
      Feb 18, 2017 at 5:51 pm
      Despite 85 civilians, including 30 children blown up into pieces by a Sunni suicide bomber, the Muslims will continue to do terror- at least on India- as there is no Islam and this ideology of Mohamed can not be spread without terror and hatred and rock throwing, etc.
      Reply
      1. I
        Inder
        Feb 18, 2017 at 5:47 pm
        It is Mohamed whom Muslims adore and copy.
        Reply
        1. U
          Uday
          Feb 18, 2017 at 5:48 pm
          Where is secularism, equality, tolerance, diversity in Muslim lands?
          Reply
          1. D
            Dr
            Feb 18, 2017 at 8:53 am
            The only way peace can return to pak is that s have to abandon their current alien faith and return to their original faith. The current ideny was imposed by foreign forces on them and they r sticking to it unable to reconcile with the shame and bloodshed it brought to them. The resulting anger is blocking them from accepting the real truth and making them to look at everyone as their enemy causing enormous violence. The simple fact is that their current faith is driving them to self destruction.
            Reply
            1. G
              Ghulam Muhammed
              Feb 18, 2017 at 9:11 am
              Like India, like stan. Both after freedom are suffering from an ongoing civil war between fundamentalist Left and fundamentalist religionists. The only difference was and is that of the army. stan was formed by UK/US for their strategic defence needs, Army has more power and funds than civilians. Just like in India religionists have gradually penetrated all state organs including army, stan too has its share of committed religionists all over. So why should a Leftist writer should be so alarmed. It goes with the territory.
              Reply
              1. G
                gogogo
                Feb 18, 2017 at 1:46 pm
                But Muslims are increasing their numbers everyday in all non-Muslim countries. And Muslim countries are reducing their non-Muslim potion every year.
                Reply
                1. G
                  gogogo
                  Feb 18, 2017 at 1:47 pm
                  Let them get drowned in their faith.
                  Reply
                  1. G
                    gogogo
                    Feb 18, 2017 at 1:44 pm
                    stanis are obsessed with religion, in fact most Muslims are. Are they very honest? Quite the opposite. There is no crime in the dictionary they will not commit for their monetary benefit.
                    Reply
                    1. G
                      George Cruz
                      Feb 18, 2017 at 4:21 am
                      The truth is that there are no democratic/secular countries in the entire Islamic world and stan is not much different.
                      Reply
                      1. K
                        krish
                        Feb 18, 2017 at 5:45 am
                        The problem is that most Muslim nations follow Political Islam, using fundemenalism as a cover up to achieve their strategic objectives. stan is no different.
                        Reply
                        1. M
                          Murthy
                          Feb 18, 2017 at 8:20 am
                          Most of these stani ideologues of Islam are childish. There never was any state that was based on their Holy Works. They should read Islamic History with honesty and sincerity. As soon their Prophet ped away, there was violence - Note the Martyrdom of Ali Hussein and all the close relations of the Islamic Prophet. The Military man, Abu Bakr won. In every 'Islamic' state only the sword / gun ruled. References to Holy Works was just for show.
                          Reply
                          1. K
                            Krishnan
                            Feb 18, 2017 at 9:56 am
                            Oh you are so mistaken! Please don't equate the madras that run government with India. The BJP and its Parivar are cultural organizations, interested more in securing native Indian culture (with all its diversity) than with the madras, which want to impose Arabian nomadic culture on settled, civilized Indian people. Big difference boss. Big difference.
                            Reply
                            1. K
                              Krishnan
                              Feb 18, 2017 at 10:20 am
                              To sum up, the Republic of India is made for Indians. stan is created for Islam. End of.
                              Reply
                              1. M
                                Mahender Goriganti
                                Feb 18, 2017 at 3:48 am
                                Very good question and the very concept of Islamic Republic Sharia laws is in conflict with any kind of democracy. Let any Islamic scholar debate this very fundamental question.
                                Reply
                                1. M
                                  mtv
                                  Feb 18, 2017 at 4:31 am
                                  Are we getting into the ultimate "Clash of Civilization" as feared?
                                  Reply
                                  1. P
                                    pankaj
                                    Feb 18, 2017 at 7:16 am
                                    you cannot define state of an islamit mind, they can twist any idea as long as it suits their ideology of winning the w world one way or the other, shariah for them is a way to rule the world. It keeps the us-vs-them of islamic world alive and kicing even in the 21st century by making muslims slaves to absurdity and stupidities. Once ruled by such laws the intellect of muslims potion is erased and the threat to islamist from muslims is gone. Non muslims they are never in a hurry to win.
                                    Reply
                                    1. D
                                      Darshak
                                      Feb 18, 2017 at 8:24 am
                                      Here is what They Talk in PK 24/7, a Type of Khutba?lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;www Dot youtube Dot com Slash watch?v=QiscJBYgRLolt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Man O Man!
                                      Reply
                                      1. D
                                        Darshak
                                        Feb 18, 2017 at 11:37 am
                                        Just one example from the Mouth of Mr. MD/A-h.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt; There are plenty of them, almost the Entire Manual and the Handbook.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Anything Otherwise is Un-Islamic and Utter Dishonesty.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers.:8:12
                                        Reply
                                        1. D
                                          Darshak
                                          Feb 18, 2017 at 10:56 am
                                          The Question Has Already Been Settled Down about 1400 Years Ago!
                                          Reply
                                          1. S
                                            Santanu Roy
                                            Feb 18, 2017 at 10:53 am
                                            Week after week the author tries to explain the inferno that sthan has becomelt;br/gt;without ever disclosing where his own sympathy lies, that is not the job of thelt;br/gt;journalist though.We can not make any sense about it and we are impatient aboutlt;br/gt;sthan.Sooner or later their nukes will come in the hand of these lunatics and then Godlt;br/gt;only knows what will be the fallout of that event
                                            Reply
                                            1. Load More Comments