Own your strategy

India must talk to Pakistan — and ensure that cross-border terror is on top of the agenda.

Written by D.C. Pathak | Published:January 5, 2016 12:07 am
flag meeting, india pakistan flag meeting, indo-pak flag meeting, latest news, loc, border, border tension, poonch, J&K, kashmir The Modi government should not make the mistake that the previous regime committed in the wake of the 26/11 attack.

The attack on the forward airbase in Pathankot on Saturday, perpetrated by terrorists who came from across the Pakistan border, yet again challenges India to find a way of keeping the India-Pakistan peace process on track despite providing a compelling case for New Delhi to give its Pakistan policy another critical look.

The event is being widely interpreted as the response of a hostile Pakistan army to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s surprise visit to Lahore in the last week of 2015 to greet his Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif, on the latter’s birthday. Intelligence reports indicate a direct planning of this daring assault by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, a sub-set of the Pakistan army, confirming the impression that the Pakistan army was not in alignment with the peace initiatives being taken by the two civilian heads of government.

The Pakistan army’s reservations about a bilateral talks agenda that accords prime importance to the issue of cross-border terrorism first led to the replacement of Sartaj Aziz, a civilian, with a retired lieutenant general, Naseer Khan Janjua, as Pakistan’s national security advisor. And this happened soon after the Ufa summit meeting where the prime ministers of both countries had met for a substantive exchange of views.

The Pathankot offensive was audaciously planned in quick time and daringly executed by militants dressed in army fatigues. They were directed to hijack a taxi and commandeer a police vehicle in order to reach close to the air base and produce a decisive result. The modus operandi employed by the terrorists is reminiscent of the attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001 — another offensive by the Jaish-e-Mohammad — and the November 2008 Mumbai attack carried out by the Lashkar-e-Taiba. The Pakistan army, even to this day, mentors both these outfits.

The attack on the Pathankot air base revives three questions that have a bearing on the future prospects of the India-Pakistan bilateral relationship. First, is the civilian leadership of Pakistan prepared to publicly accept the stipulation that violence shall not be used to press for a solution of the Kashmir problem? Second, can Pakistan’s prime minister declare that while the process of evolving confidence-building measures in order to reduce tension along the Line of Control and the International Border in Jammu and Kashmir is on, such disruptions will not come in the way of talks on the economic cooperation front? And finally, will the Pakistan government announce disarming of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and its front outfits while expediting the 26/11 trial?

The reality of the Pakistan army dictating the agenda that the civilian leadership brings to the table in bilateral talks cannot be wished away. If our leadership believes our own intelligence agencies then it should firmly tell Pakistan’s prime minister that the argument of deniability, once again advanced by the Pakistan army and the Inter-Services Intelligence in the wake of the Pathankot attack, just does not hold
any longer. India also has to impress upon the United States, whose persuasive pressure for the resumption of bilateral talks is
only too well known, that red lines will have to be drawn on the issue of terrorism if India’s help in the global “war on terror” is to make sense.

As far as the Pathankot incident is concerned, it is correct to take the line that enemies of humanity are responsible for the attack but it should also be stated that those who mentored such militants would be taught a lesson as well. Then, and only then, will the praise for the valour of our security forces have real substance. The Modi government should not make the mistake that the previous regime committed in the wake of the 26/11 attack — that of accepting the glib suggestion that some “non-state actors” were behind all the mischief of cross-border terrorism, which had afflicted India all these years. Already a section of the Pakistan media has unabashedly questioned the fact that the Pathankot airbase was attacked by elements from within Pakistan.

Modi’s effort to encourage his counterpart to take charge of the political decision-making in our neighbouring country must also bear fruit soon enough. Otherwise Modi’s Pakistan policy could start looking ambiguous.

India has to stick to the three-fold strategy of keeping cross-border terrorism on top of the agenda of bilateral talks, maintaining that India has no problem with bilateral discussion on Kashmir in accordance with the Simla Agreement (that gave no place to any third party like the Hurriyat), and, as a regional stake holder, demanding a role in the reconstruction of Afghanistan.

At home, India must prepare for an effective and integral response to the threat of cross-border terrorism. When it comes to dealing with terrorism, there is a need to further improve Centre-state collaboration as well as civil-military coordination.

In short, India need not shun talking to Pakistan — but without compromising on the above-mentioned parameters. At the same time, India should continue to bilaterally strengthen its friendship with all the countries in its neighbourhood, even if this means that we simultaneously deal with an unhelpful Pakistan with appropriate sternness.

Modi has handled foreign policy very well so far and he need not allow his approach towards Pakistan — a country controlled by the military — to diminish this achievement in any way. A recalcitrant neighbour promoting faith-based militancy against us has to be countered on the borders as well as on other planes through a comprehensive strategy that is our own and in sync with India’s strategic culture.

The writer is a former director of the Intelligence Bureau.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. B
    Bnm
    Jan 5, 2016 at 5:32 pm
    Enough is Enough,strengthen border,stop all contacts,apply pressure from western countires on sthan
    Reply
    1. R
      Raj
      Jan 5, 2016 at 4:23 am
      Nobody is optimistic after the coward act in Pathankot. What prize we have paid- the nation had lost great people like Lt col Niranjan Kumar. The cross border terrorism need to stop for any peaceful activities.
      Reply
      1. S
        Satendra kumar
        Jan 5, 2016 at 8:38 am
        The choice for disarming thre terrorist groups specific for stan government will be welcome gestures claimants as a illegal organisation banned in the country.The Indian government should work with international forums of banning this organisation who does terrorism on behalf of religion.The cross border terrorist activities should be brought to world forums sending clear messages this criminal activities should be barred from the planet.
        Reply
        1. K
          K SHESHU
          Jan 6, 2016 at 11:12 am
          The issue of terrorism is a matter of concern for both countries. Unless both sit to-gether and chalk out programme of action, the problem will continue to haunt both the countries. stan has military influence in political affairs and so it has to see that military does not scuttle the process of normalisation.
          Reply
          1. K
            K SHESHU
            Jan 5, 2016 at 6:35 am
            The talks should proceed but both the governments should be aware of the fundementalists on both sides. There are detractors on either side of the border and they can wreathe havoc at any time. Strict vigil must be maintained to abort the evil designs of these elements.
            Reply
            1. S
              SK
              Jan 5, 2016 at 3:22 am
              I think the author of this article is living in fool's paradise. Has Pak done anything to prevent the cross border terrorism so far. The author think that Nawaz Shriff runs the government , certainly not it is the army which is not interested in peace. If Israel had taken the advice of this gutless person it would have been finished by the terrorists. for tat is the only answer for terrorists. By the way what are we going to achieve from these gutless people.
              Reply
              1. K
                Karunakaran
                Jan 5, 2016 at 7:50 pm
                Nobody that I know believes one word coming out of dopey Jaitley. I would not trust him even if my life depended on it. If BJP loses the next Lok Sabha elections, you will know whose presence made it happen. Remember that he lost the elections! But he managed to get in. But now, if BJP loses the next Lok Sabha elections, you will know who to blame. India must get ready to welcome Mr Nitish Kumar as the next PM. Mr Nitish Kumar has cl and substance. The crouching, dokhla-eating Gujjubhai whose chin touches his chest, is only good to run after the goras for selfies, and provide photoshopped black to pink images of himself to the media.
                Reply
                1. K
                  Karunakaran
                  Jan 4, 2016 at 11:25 pm
                  USA, UK, Israel also make good use of dogs (and reportedly other animals) to watch over sensitive sites - as humans tend to become terribly lazy after a few years of inactivity. Most Indian military officers do no manual work, and grow huge tummies! So, dogs come handy. Isn't it strange that the military sites so close to the border have no dog squads to provide an extra layer of security?
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments