• Associate Sponsor

Out of my mind: Jihadi or shaheed?

We have war crimes as a new category in international law, for which there is an international court.

Written by Meghnad Desai | Published: August 31, 2014 12:02 am
Army and police officers said the attack on the Musab bin Omair Mosque in Diyala yesterday came after Shiite militiamen were killed in clashes, while other sources said it followed a roadside bomb near one of their patrols. When the video depicting the beheading of James Foley appeared along with a masked man speaking in a distinct London accent, there was a near nervous breakdown in British political circle.

The first jihadi from India has just reportedly died in the Iraq/Syria war. Do we know how many have gone to fight there? The British media are agog with dread. As many as a thousand or even more British Muslims may have gone to fight for the Iraqi al-Qaeda, which has now become the Islamic State. Reports are that around 200 may have re-entered the UK. No one knows for sure.

When the video depicting the beheading of James Foley appeared along with a masked man speaking in a distinct London accent, there was a near nervous breakdown in British political circles. No one disowned them as children of foreign immigrants. How could ‘our’ boys do this? Where did we fail to teach them British values? Where and who are the extremists who incite and recruit these boys to go and fight for the Caliphate, which is now reaching new depths in brutality? Can we deport these people? Is this a failure of multiculturalism that we failed to integrate young Muslims into British life?

Welcome to globalisation and a tech-, media-savvy generation. Get plugged into youth culture around the world and then you can begin to separate the normal from the abnormal. Cinema across the world glories in violent films, be it Sylvestor Stallone’s or Salman Khan’s. Parallel cinema is even more gruesome. Rappers have violent lyrics which command huge sales. Computer games are also bloodthirsty.

The young have adrenaline flowing through their systems and are more daring, more likely to take risks and more unmindful of the physical damage they inflict on themselves than their seniors. We are celebrating the centenary of the First World War when thousands of young people went out to kill an enemy whom they had never seen and who had personally done them no harm. But their elders told them these were the ‘Enemy’. That was enough for perfect strangers to kill each other. The Church on both sides egged their soldiers on to kill. All thought systems, religious as well as secular ideologies such as Leninism, Fascism, Maoism, encourage people to kill each other while claiming to be peace-loving. The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, a Leninist Party, killed one-seventh of the population on the grounds that they were middle class and hence did not belong to the classless society the Khmer Rouge wanted to construct. Many young people during the inter-War period from India and elsewhere dedicated their lives to the October Revolution which sometimes asked them to kill their nearest and dearest. British Communist volunteers who went to the Spanish Civil War fought the Socialists on their side as cheerfully as the Fascists.

The Sunni jihadis in the Islamic State want to kill all apostates, including Sunni tribes which do not adhere to the al-Qaeda sectarian view and also, of course, all Shias, to say nothing of Yazidis and Christians. Nouri al-Maliki, the just ousted prime minister of Iraq, created a Shia-majority democracy where no Iraqi Sunni family could feel safe. He was only taking revenge for what Saddam Hussein had done to his people.

Young men, and some women, fight and die for the cause in the full belief that this is the martyrdom worth having. Be it the Anushilan martyrs, who threw bombs at the British, or the Irish Sinn Fein ‘terrorists’ fighting to throw out their rulers, violence confers honour from your side and hatred and calumny from those who are being attacked. One man’s shaheed is another man’s terrorist. There is no moral high ground here for any nation or any people. We may hope that as we progress with time, all will become peace-loving and friendly with others. But there is a long way to go yet.

We are perhaps more aware of human rights and the idea that a lot of adversarialp killing is unjustified. We have war crimes as a new category in international law, for which there is an international court. But these courts cannot prosecute without a superior force to apprehend the criminals and bring them to trial.

There is no such force left in the world. The prospect is of more anarchy and more martyrdom.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

More From Meghnad Desai
Meghnad Desai
  • Out of my mind: Where is AAP?

    But there is a bigger question here. Why is it difficult in India, even after 70 years of democracy, to build non-dynastic grassroots parties which…

  • Out of my mind: The Padmavati debacle

    Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh may be lost, but that is a problem for Vasundhara Raje and Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Modi has to secure the trust…

  • Out Of My Mind: All together now

    Given our federal structure, the idea of holding elections simultaneously in the 29 states plus the Centre is impossible as of now. Some Constitutional amendments…

  1. P
    Sep 6, 2014 at 8:26 pm
    They are muslims first British afterwards. They will never be fully British and never understandBritish values. To call them British is wrong. To them Islam is first and their country last. Importation/muslim immigration is in the form of a curse to Europe. There is still time to control this religious disease. As time pes and we come to the next generation, the game will be lost. England,France, Germany will be like Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia. Scary, more Scary and yet more scary.
    1. B
      Aug 31, 2014 at 10:55 am
      Some time I wonder how "Informant strategy(Policia mukhbar)" worked very well during British rule over India. Have British Govt forgotten this strategy in finding out how many young Muslims are being converted to JIHADIS. With all respect to ISLAM, I feel their clerics/Maulvis are responsible to convert them into JIHADIS.Besides, liberal funding from Saudi Arabia Govt or trading community in the name of Zakaat and encouragement from Rogue Muslim States, are responsible for all this useless blood shed.I recall a joke some one circulated on mobile that a suicide bomber after his death talked to another suicide bomber that he is is Heaven( JANAT), here every one is roaming about naked. No bar on . Friend where from and what are you.First Jihadi told other that he is in streets of KARACHI as DOG.
      1. A
        Alok Asthana
        Aug 31, 2014 at 2:21 pm
        Maybe you should read the BJP man - Arnab Goswami.
        1. A
          Alok Asthana
          Aug 31, 2014 at 6:25 am
          Very true. Wonder why people refer to ISIS as terrorists? They are fighting a full blown conventional war, risking their lives for their beliefs. Whether we believe in their cause or not hardly gives us the right to call them terrorists. Indians claim POK, a huge chunk of territory, since last 67 years. What risks have they taken, or even dream to take, to recover their part of 'motherland'? Those who are ready to die for their beliefs are terrorists but those who sit at home when part of their motherland is begin further handed over by Pak to China, are nationalists!
          1. Suresh Suresh
            Sep 4, 2014 at 6:24 am
            Let Desai stay in England and preach his phoney pacifist views,we in India don't care if Britain wants to own up the jehidists as their own it's their funeral,but in India we still have horrible memories of Muslim rule of thousand years and we certainly will not look upon kindly on any so called shahid and neither do we want these monsters back under any post modernist pretence.We will make sure to make clear to these evil forces that they are no more welcome in India
            1. Load More Comments