• Associate Sponsor

Out Of My Mind: All together now

Given our federal structure, the idea of holding elections simultaneously in the 29 states plus the Centre is impossible as of now. Some Constitutional amendments will be required.

Written by Meghnad Desai | Updated: February 4, 2018 8:56 am
Out of my Mind: All together now If simultaneous elections are to be held in India, some such device will be necessary.

The question of simultaneous elections has come up again. No matter how many people dismiss it, it will not go away. The Prime Minister has reiterated it, as has the President. They have invited our thoughts. Here goes.

The difficulties are well-known. We follow the British system. A government holds office as long as it enjoys the confidence of the elected chamber. If it loses that confidence and the Opposition cannot form another government which can win confidence, then new elections have to be held. Given our federal structure, the idea of holding elections simultaneously in the 29 states plus the Centre is impossible as of now. Some Constitutional amendments will be required.

In the UK, the Fixed Term Parliament Act (FTPA) was passed during the coalition government of 2010-15. The Liberal Democrats, who were the minority partner, were worried that the Conservatives may ditch them mid-term and dissolve Parliament to emerge as a single party majority in the new election. They insisted as part of the Coalition pact that Parliament be for a fixed term of five years. (Between 1945 and 2010, a British government had ruled for full five years only five times.) The Act made removing a government mid-term difficult by setting a high threshold for a no-confidence motion to be passed as well as for the prime minister to dissolve parliament. The Act was not made applicable to the devolved parliaments since the UK is not a federation. There has also been a long-standing radical demand that the power of the prime minister to dissolve parliament is derived from the Royal Prerogative and is unsuitable for modern times. It is parliament, not the prime minister, who should be sovereign.

In fact, the FTPA has not been binding. Last year, Theresa May was able to dissolve Parliament two years into the new term without any opposition. But the restriction could be useful in India. It makes frivolous no-confidence motions or dissolution of Parliament difficult. Governments are forced to last the full term unless hugely unpopular.

If simultaneous elections are to be held in India, some such device will be necessary. The difficulty is two-fold. The idea that simultaneous elections should be held has the hidden assumption that it is the Prime Minister who will call the shots. The proposal, as of now, does not bind the Prime Minister to a strict five-year cycle. In a federation with a written Constitution (unlike the UK), this involves a huge shift of power to the Centre and to the incumbent Prime Minister. It would require not just a constitutional amendment but perhaps a constitutional convention with representation from the Centre and all the states to decide the matter. Even so, difficulties remain.

If a state government becomes unpopular, it may need to be dismissed. If there is FTPA but the Opposition secures the necessary majority, then the winning party has to agree to serve only the remainder of the term or President’s Rule has to be imposed . But what if the government at the Centre loses a vote of confidence? Does the Opposition form a government for the remainder of the term? Or do we have new simultaneous elections?

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

More From Meghnad Desai
Meghnad Desai
  • Out of my mind: Where is AAP?

    But there is a bigger question here. Why is it difficult in India, even after 70 years of democracy, to build non-dynastic grassroots parties which…

  • Out of my mind: The Padmavati debacle

    Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh may be lost, but that is a problem for Vasundhara Raje and Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Modi has to secure the trust…

  • Out of my mind: Suicide wish

    There is one name which is always particularly intriguing and indeed could have changed the course of political history had he got his chance —…

  1. Sahib Singh
    Feb 5, 2018 at 12:10 am
    This might have been true in the fifties and sixties in the minds of some unimaginative people. But to say that this tiny step forward in this day and age of technological advances is impossible is just false. All the more reason for the old fogies who think like that to go to the mountains and take Sanyaas. And let the younger more capable generation who are "with it" run the country's affairs.
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. G Shikaripur
      Feb 4, 2018 at 7:47 pm
      1) Let us please turn our attent-ion to the real, hardc-ore problem : 67 crore poorest Indians share just one per ce-nt of the weal-th crea-ted in India in 2017, while the rich-est one per ce-nt have grab-bed 73 per ce-nt of this annu-al weal-th ( OXFAM INDIA - 2018 ). ( 2 ) With regard to elect-ion itse-lf the main quest-ion the author shou-ld raise is : Does any party or candid-ate , includ-ing Modiji, rea-lly campa-ign with-out a good chunk of " invisi-ble money " (Mr Jaitley ) ? !
      (2)(0)
      Reply
      1. Sahib Singh
        Feb 5, 2018 at 12:18 am
        You will have at least two people who will vehemently disagree with you. One of them is a guy running around pretending to be an economist called Surjit S. Bhalla and other is our beloved PM. Remember when he said, "Na khaonga, Na khane doonga". But then Arvind Kejriwal provided documentary proof of a twelve (12) Crore bribe from the Birlas supposedly paid to the CM of Gujarat who just happened to be Mr. Modi himself.
        (0)(0)
        Reply
      2. Employ Ment
        Feb 4, 2018 at 6:20 pm
        🔴🆓बेरोजगारी हटाओ अभियान🆓🔴 ✔मोदी जी द्वारा चलाए गए डिजिटल इन्डिया से जुड़े और कमाए 15,000 - 20,000 रुपए महीना ✔अब कोई नही रहेगा बेरोज़गार और नही करेगा कोई बेरोज़गार आत्महत्या ✔क्योंकि अब आ गई है 21वीं सदी की सबसे बड़ी रोज़गार क्रांति ✔हमारा सपना पूरे भारत को ही नही पूरी दुनिया को डिजिटल इंडिया से जोड़ना ✔सबका साथ सबका विकास ➡शुरुवात कैसे करे 📲Champ'Cash-Digital`India App को प्ले स्टोर से इन्स्टल करे, और साइन अप करे, $1 डॉलर बोनस स्पौन्सर 🆔: 4⃣6⃣8⃣9⃣4⃣2⃣ 👉🏻चैलेंज को पूरा करे 👉🏻और इंकम करनी शुरू करे 👉🏻इसे जरूर नोट कर ले👉🏻 स्पौन्सर 🆔: 4⃣6⃣8⃣9⃣4⃣2⃣ . . . . . . . . Gbshdhdbdjkdkd
        (1)(0)
        Reply
        1. Dev Karan Singh
          Feb 4, 2018 at 2:21 pm
          In this age of advance technology it is very much possible. To serve national interest the idea should be given a serious thought.
          (2)(16)
          Reply
          1. No To Klein
            Feb 4, 2018 at 8:48 pm
            can you offer your 'serious thought' on how technology will solve this? just think for a second. how can you conduct both polls simultaneously? how many govts complete their term?between 1990 and 2000, there were 4 elections for parliaments. ridiculous
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Sahib Singh
              Feb 5, 2018 at 12:24 am
              Dear Dev Karan Singh, what you are doing is like, "Bhains ke aage bean bajaanaa". Yeh Bandar kya jaane Adhrak ka swaad?. These backward thinking mental midgets will not understand this simple fact that this could have been done long time ago. We can reach the planet Mars successfully in the first attempt but we cannot consolidate the voting dates. Go figure.
              (0)(0)
              Reply
            2. S
              Satish Chopra
              Feb 4, 2018 at 11:05 am
              Government should not go for saving time and money at the cost of safety and chaos . Like any romp up principle, first attempt same day election in one state. Then do it 3 states together and may be one region all together. If successful with no loss of life then go for all 4 regions at a same time assuming that 4-5 times resources shall be required with respect to one region all together exercise.
              (6)(1)
              Reply
              1. Load More Comments
              Adda