Congratulations to Narendra Modi and the BJP for registering a historic victory not only for themselves but for India as well. This election will be a significant departure from history in several other dimensions as well, as historians and political scientists will discuss it over the coming weeks and months and years. For example, the curtain has not yet been dropped on caste politics, but we are nearer that dream reality.
Mayawati: zero seats; Mandal Lalu Prasad: three seats; Mandal Mulayam’s Samajwadi Party: five seats (all figures at the time of going to press). This is the demise of the Mandal politicians and it is poetic justice that Narendra Modi, a lower caste OBC, and one who has never played the caste card, and indeed vehemently argued against it, should be the one to provide a death blow to Mandal politics. The Congress has been saying for ever to just wait and see, and that a week is a long time in politics, but don’t bet any of your hard-earned money on caste politics not declining significantly in India’s future.
What has nearly ended is communist politics. The Left parties managed to obtain only 10 seats, half their 2009 number, and ended their masquerade as a national party.
But the real political story of this election is the near-complete decimation of the Congress. The party has had two humiliating defeats in the past — the first in the old India of 1977, when Indira Gandhi was punished for destroying institutions, most importantly for destroying the institution of democracy by imposing Emergency in 1975.
The second greatest loss was in 1999, when the Congress obtained only 114 seats. And Election 2014 is witness to the Congress hitting its lowest ever tally, 45. There is more ignominy in this than just the low, low number. This number is barely eight seats more than that of a regional party, J. Jayalalithaa’s AIADMK. Just a little bit of push and the Congress could have ended as the third-largest party.
It was refreshing to see Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi offering to resign after his heavy defeat (only three seats out of 14 for the Congress versus seven for the BJP). Unfortunately, at least at the time of going to press, the Congress was still in sycophantic denial. They uttered the usual platitudes — we have seen defeat before, we have bounced back, we have full faith in the High Command, etc.
The reality is that the Congress as we have known it, and have loved and hated it, is destroyed, and it is the political death of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. When will the leaders realise that feudalism is over, that monarchy is over, and that India has moved significantly forward and changed? When a 130 year-old national party obtains less than a 12th of the total seats on offer, and barely makes it as the second-largest political party, regional or otherwise, it cannot, should not, and for its own survival, must not remain the same.
Also note that the Congress, with this debacle, ceases to be recognised as an official opposition party. Thus, it is time that the Gandhis realised that their reign is over — and acknowledged that none of the three Gandhis is a political leader. The Congress must accept the brutal fact that Sonia Gandhi has been vastly overrated as a political strategist, thinker or leader. Indeed, all the evidence suggests that she has been a failure in politics.
Consider the following. Shortly after the second consecutive debacle of the Congress party (140 seats under Narasimha Rao in 1996 and 141 seats under Sitaram Kesri in February 1998), Sonia Gandhi assumed the presidency of the Congress on March 14, 1998. In the next parliamentary election, after 20 months at the helm, for the first time, Sonia Gandhi’s Congress registered a historic low of 114 seats.
Five years later in 2004, in the second election fought under Sonia Gandhi, the Congress managed to repeat the Rao-Kesri low of 145 seats. Thus, it was not because of the Congress’s popularity that Sonia Gandhi had the chance to listen to her inner voice and install Manmohan Singh as prime minister; it was a coalition marriage of convenience that gave the UPA the chance to rule the country.
Five years later, in 2009, Sonia Gandhi’s Congress-led UPA did register a convincing Lok Sabha win, with the Congress alone obtaining 206 seats, some nine more than even Rajiv Gandhi had obtained in 1989. However, the jury is very definitely out on how much credit should go to Sonia Gandhi for her political acumen, and how much to Singh for helping India register 8.5 per cent-plus GDP growth for five consecutive years. And five years later, in 2014, again under the leadership of Sonia Gandhi, just 45 seats.
So was it the inept leadership of Rahul Gandhi that made the Congress lose this election so badly? Hardly. I have maintained for more than a year that he is the wrong choice for a political leader because, while politics is in his blood, it is not in his soul. His mother thrusting the leadership on him is like a feudal, conservative, old-fashioned, son-preferring parent wanting her son to be a dentist, when all he wants to do is play the guitar.
And what happened to the much advertised Priyanka Gandhi effect? Though it will take some time to analyse the data, the possibility is real that her entry into the campaign probably lost some seats for the Congress. The writing is crystal clear on the wall, if only the blind and obsequious Congress-wallahs would see it — the days of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty are over. Finito.
More than a year ago, in ‘Message to Sonia: reform or perish’, (IE, March 30, 2013), I wrote: “Recall that Annie Besant became president of the Congress party in 1917. If Sonia Gandhi does not change, then she risks the following obituary of the party she heads: ‘It took a white, European, socialist, woman to help create the Congress party — and it has taken a white, European, socialist, woman to destroy it more than a hundred years later’.” Sometimes, but not often enough, one does get a forecast right!
The writer is chairman of Oxus Investments, an emerging market advisory firm, and a senior advisor to Zyfin, a leading financial information company
- The little-revenue tax
LTCG is a bad idea. The best policy for the taxman is one that maximises revenue, not one that maximises his morality, or his employment,…
- Revolution and regression
Tax buoyancy has helped the government to budget for schemes that make transfer of revenues to the bottom third of the population possible. There was…
- Smart policies for redistribution
India can, and must, reform its welfare system. More efficient redistribution is desirable for ethical and political reasons..