Monsoons and markets

These are the root causes of agricultural distress. Farmers need better irrigation and access to markets.

Written by Ashok Gulati | Published:July 20, 2015 12:14 am
Nabard, GDP, Agrarian crisis, farmers organisation, FPOs, irrigation projects, farmers subsidy,  Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana, PMKSY, agricultural news, farmers news, india news, indian express, indian express column Given that in the first three years of the 12th Plan (2012-17), the average rate of growth in agri-GDP has been a mere 1.7 per cent against a target of 4 per cent, there is cause for concern as this is leading to agrarian distress.

Speaking at the foundation day celebrations of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard) on July 12, Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said that there were reasons to smile on the economic front as India remains a bright spot, despite the global slowdown. He talked about the 7-8 per cent overall growth in hand, and the 8-10 per cent growth that is realisable in the near future. But he admitted that agriculture remains a concern and promised that as tax revenue goes up, an increasing share would be spent on building a strong and vibrant agricultural sector.

Nabard can play an important role in that process. It has completed 33 years of service to the nation. From 1982 to 2015, it has come a long way in terms of extending rural credit for myriad programmes ranging from rural roads and irrigation under the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund to building value chains with farmer producer organisations (FPOs) and micro-finance initiatives. Of late, it has also acquired the distinction of being accredited as the first national implementing entity (NIE) of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. As an NIE, Nabard is supposed to lead and promote work on climate change adaptation and mitigation, especially in agriculture and rural development activities.

Given that in the first three years of the 12th Plan (2012-17), the average rate of growth in agri-GDP has been a mere 1.7 per cent against a target of 4 per cent, there is cause for concern as this is leading to agrarian distress. No wonder, Nabard chose “mitigating agrarian distress and enhancing farm income” as a suitable topic for discussion, which was inaugurated by Jaitley. It is worth sharing some of the takeaways from this seminar, attended by several brilliant speakers who have devoted their lives to Indian agriculture and rural development.

What are the root causes of agrarian  distress today? Basically, two factors: monsoons and markets. A drought last year, followed by unseasonal rains that damaged the rabi crop, and falling global agri-prices, which are pushing down domestic farm prices of several commodities, from rice and corn to sugar and groundnuts. Farmers’ incomes have plummeted and many cannot service their loans, raising demands for a loan waiver. Small and fragmented holdings, excessive specialisation and input intensification of agriculture as well as restrictive markets also contribute to the increasing distress.

What could be the policy solutions? A major focus is needed on water for irrigation — both in terms of developing irrigation in a cost-effective manner to drought-proof agriculture but also managing our water resources more efficiently. Since the pricing of water and power for irrigation is highly subsidised — at places even free — it is but natural for farmers to go for water-heavy crops like rice and sugarcane, wherever they get access to water. Both are being produced in excess of domestic requirements. India exported 12 million metric tonne of rice in 2014-15, becoming the largest exporter of rice for the third year in a row. Sugar is also in plenty, but cannot be exported due to low global prices, creating a major crisis in the sugar industry of cane arrears touching unprecedented levels of Rs 21,000 crore. In any case, exports of rice and sugar mean exporting billions of cubic meters of scarce water. This must be rationalised through innovative policies that can reward farmers for saving water (and power) and diversifying away from water-guzzling crops. Can Nabard take up this challenge under its new role as an NIE of the GCF by promoting sustainable and more diversified agriculture? It could have a high pay-off.

Jaitley mentioned that the government is committed to enhancing investment in irrigation to tackle droughts. The government has already raised the funding of the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) to Rs 50,000 crore for the next five years. Since this programme consolidates the watershed management and accelerated irrigation benefit schemes, one will have to wait and see how much more money is really being put into the PMKSY.

Nevertheless, the policy seems to be a step in the right direction. But to deliver more crop for every drop of water, could Nabard spearhead the promotion of innovative farming practices (such as the system of rice intensification and precision farming) and technologies (like drip and check dams) through its network of NGOs and FPOs? This is a worthwhile agenda for Nabard to follow.

Jaitley also mentioned overhauling the existing crop insurance system to make it more robust and responsive to farmers’ needs and that the government is currently working on this. While irrigation will take time to deliver, crop insurance can be fixed relatively quickly and it could act as an effective coping strategy to contain farmer distress. This is another area where Nabard could chip in.

On the markets front, there is a consensus that we need to organise farmers into groups (FPOs, cooperatives or any other form) to create scale, and integrate them with commodity value chains. For building value chains and ensuring farmers get their due share, a lot of market reforms will be needed — from changes in the APMC regime to building infrastructure (rural roads, warehouses etc). Nabard is already doing quite a bit of work in this area and could scale up its operations to make sure that farmers get a good remunerative price for their produce. Building value chains can also create millions of off-farm jobs within the rural economy. But linking FPOs to front-end organised retailers or food processors will be a challenge as both are at a nascent stage and many states do not even allow organised retail. The announcement of an e-national market by the government cannot take off unless several of these hurdles are cleared and grading of products introduced from the beginning.

Thus, in brief, agrarian distress can be relieved and farmers’ incomes enhanced with better irrigation and water management, more diversified agriculture, robust science-based crop insurance, as well as better access to markets. This will also help promote more sustainable agriculture. Nabard can surely contribute to achieving much of this.

The writer is Infosys Chair Professor for Agriculture at Icrier

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. R
    raven
    Jul 21, 2015 at 2:11 am
    how to view this article in a single page format? help!
    Reply
  2. L
    Loken Das
    Jul 21, 2015 at 10:03 pm
    Thanks Dr Gulati Sir for making us think through. We have always been proud of being in NABARD and the cause we fight for. Such guidance and encouragement makes us put best of our efforts.
    Reply
  3. H
    HILARY
    Jul 20, 2015 at 12:38 pm
    Irrigation needs water and water in India during the agriculture season is in short supply. Groundwater level is sinking by the day and will soon cease to be sustainable. Although it is great to have irrigation for agriculture, the position of water availability in India is such that what is fine in theory is not feasible on the ground. In the south Karnataka there is a serious problem of mismatch between supply and demand. Five times more than what is needed is cultivated in the sugarcane crop and when there are no buyers, farmers who borrowed money to cultivate, commit suicide. Growing of sugarcane and in fact the sugar industry in India is economically unsustainable and the farmers must be told very clearly that they should shift to crops that need less water and for which there is a demand in the market. Unfortunately this is not done by politicians and administrators and a drama which indeed is a tragedy, is repeated year after year ad nauseam. Indian is a dry country and sooner the bulk of the cultivation shifts to dry farming the better. Holding out the promise of irrigation is wonderful in theory but is not realistic as far as practical farming is concerned. I can tell you that as a farmer and grower of fruits and vegetables.
    Reply
  4. P
    Palengri
    Jul 20, 2015 at 8:51 pm
    What are the root causes of agrarian distress today? Basically, two factors: monsoons and markets. Farmers can not decide on the vagaries of monsoons.But what about the markets?Middlemen loot the farmers. Please look at the vegetable or commercial crop prices. It is less said the better.Look at the rubber and coconut prices in Kerala. Price of a coconut in the market is sky rocketing. But what is the income a farmer is getting. Practically nothing for the labor and money he is putting through out the year.So government should come out with a pragmatic policy to eliminate the middlemen.Palengri
    Reply
  5. R
    Ramesh Grover
    Jul 20, 2015 at 7:32 am
    It is a right write up suggestion rational solutions. However, the problem lies in the area of putting the suggestions on ground. Instead of trying to attend the problem of implementation at a macro level which as daunting, over- awing and full of confusion and contradictions in a complex country like India, it may be appropriate to put it in smaller packages. The detailing, inter-connecting, monitoring and continuous natural system of flexible adjustments may have to be worked out at state levels, regional levels, or su-regional levels. The approach of co-operative federalism will need to be refined, stream lined, and up dated on a continuing basis.
    Reply
  6. S
    SP
    Jul 20, 2015 at 7:39 pm
    I feel we should promote contract farming by starting a public sector company which can plan more diversified agriculture. Farmer can lease his land and labour and let the company do investment, crop planning and so on. Let them manage without subsidies for water, fertilizer and interest on loans. If the public sector runs well, it can play a stellar role in the development of country. The model can then be expanded to other private sector companies, though they already do a bit of it, it does not seem to be making a big dent. Also rich farmers should do their bit for poor counter-parts. We should also have nation-wide movement to preserve water whether in villages or cities.
    Reply
  7. V
    vyjayanthi
    Jul 20, 2015 at 12:05 pm
    NABARD has been accredited as the first National Implementing Eny (NIE) of Green Climate Fund (GCF) established under United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. NIE will be in charge of all the projects financed by the Green Climate Fund. The GC fund's prerogative is to make developing and poor countries adapt to the impacts of climate change as they are more vulnerable to the grave impacts of climate change. Now NABARD's role umes great importance in not only financing climate change adaptation and mitigating gas emissions that cause resource degradation in India -- but also to establish sustainable agriculture and equitable rural development.
    Reply
  8. Load More Comments