Heart of darkness

All this is going to have an effect on the polity and the way we will go about our democratic or undemocratic ways. If the state is slack on issues of social cohesion, the nation will pay for it. Nothing subverts law like lynch law.

Written by Keki N. Daruwalla | Updated: July 20, 2017 7:35 am
 mob lynching, lynching, mob killings, junaid khan lynching, lynch law, democracy, muslim, attack against minorities, human rights, indian express Illustration: C R Sasikumar

Are we, as a nation, inclined to reading the fine print? Can one say confidently of any people that they can read the fine print? Look at how Donald Trump swayed the Americans and how they wail about it now. Is our government reading it? And the ultimate question — is the fine print really fine?

We have been having a mournful feast of words recently. The president, who has spoken about mob frenzy and intolerance, talked about the forces of darkness to be kept at bay. The prime minister and other ministers have condemned mob killings. But all this is so broad brush. It seems the real cancer is being swept under the carpet (excuse the scrambled metaphor). The core is hidden, the mind indoctrinated with sectarian antipathy that is reflected in the senseless murder of Junaid. The real issue is being sidestepped.

Junaid Khan, a handsome fifteen-year-old boy going for his Eid shopping was killed because he wore a skull cap, looked like a Muslim and horrors, was a Muslim. Hence the lumpen mob must have thought momentarily that they could get away with murder. They also stabbed his brothers.

This was not a case of transporting cattle or storing meat, where you could, with the aid of a conniving police, falsely accuse victims of intended cow slaughter. It is noteworthy that mobs are killing on “intended crimes” now, the murderer speculates on your intention (mens rea) and kills. Junaid’s case does not fall in the same basket as those of Akhlaq Ahmed or of Pehlu Khan, both victims of mob murders. We are confronted with a paradigm shift in the case of Junaid Khan. He was killed merely because of the “crime” of being a Muslim. This boggles the mind.

Does the state realise that with all these killings and obstreperous statements by some fringe leaders, it may be moving towards a conflict with the largest minority in the country? The party in power thinks it can go it alone. Of course, it can. No wonder it did not bother to give a single ticket to a Muslim in the recent Uttar Pradesh elections. But does that smell of “sab ka saath”? Is that the way you take the nation with you, a nation blessed with a hundred languages and castes and faiths, ranging from animism to monotheism? We also have the burden of the vulnerable: The most visually challenged people in the world, the most leprosy-afflicted people in the world. The list is rather long.

One hears that lumpen elements roam around at night on village roads in cars, lights blazing, looking for elusive cattle slaughterers. It is almost turning into a sport. I thought of Gloucester in King Lear: “As flies to wanton boys are we to th’ gods. They kill us for their sport.”

We need to look back at our history. When did the first bomb blasts rock the country? After what events did terrorism come to India?

The sad day that Mohammad Akhlaq was killed and his house vandalised, that was the time the state ought to have acted. The prime minister could have spoken then, not two years later. It was the Atwal moment which Punjab and the Centre let go, when the DIG was shot in front of Durbar Sahib. Eventually, we all know the story of Operation Blue Star. Hard and timely action was needed earlier.

Now take the case of Yogi Adityanath. The day he takes over, mutton shops are burnt in Meerut. A stern warning to the lumpen elements followed by a direction to the police to take firm action, and UP would have been quiet. Instead, his whole emphasis was on “illegal slaughter houses” and how he would close them. The police, instead of taking strict action sanctioned by law, looked towards the BJP.

All this is going to have an effect on the polity and the way we will go about our democratic or undemocratic ways. If the state is slack on issues of social cohesion, the nation will pay for it. Nothing subverts law like lynch law.

Lastly, remember Bhagalpur? About a thousand lives were lost in the 1989 riots. Recently, Kameshwar Yadav, “a key figure” in the riots, has been acquitted by the Patna High Court. He returns to the pavilion, bat in hand. Come to think of it, whether it is 1947 or 1984 or 2002, or Hashimpura or Bhagalpur, at a rough guess, 95 per cent of the killers get away with it, not a good testimonial for our justice system, or our secularism.

Daruwala, a poet and short story writer, was awarded the Sahitya Akademi Award in 1984

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. Purushendu Kumar
    Jul 21, 2017 at 10:40 am
    Communal violence- A monster that gets shape and vomit it's venom to make human being helpless. And it dis s to it's awesome place, the pocket of political patriarch.A furious nightmare is devastating our dreams.
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. K
      kar
      Jul 20, 2017 at 10:36 pm
      WAIT TILL 10 YEARS AND WE WILL SEE NEW ERA OF DESPOTISM WHICH WAS FORE WARNED BY ALL THOSE SECULARISTS.
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. N
        Narendera
        Jul 20, 2017 at 8:41 pm
        Highly misleading and biased article .
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. Seshubabu Kilambi
          Jul 20, 2017 at 7:56 pm
          Nation is going into perpetual darkness ..light sems to be mirage ..for now .
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. R
            rddy
            Jul 20, 2017 at 4:24 pm
            These communist and converted baastaards should be lynched first, this baastard never writes about recent killing of Amaranth Pilgrims by Islamic Jihadist just because they are just Hindus, until the day India is free from these anti national liberals and communists Hindus life will be in Danger, Lynchh these guys along with their family's to protect Hindus
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. A
              Ajit Das
              Jul 20, 2017 at 5:09 pm
              English lexicon is nor bereft of polite, yer forceful words. Why use such offensive and derogatory language to give vent to your feelings? You've a right to hold your views so others also have similar right. Why display the animal pedigree?
              (0)(0)
              Reply
              1. C
                Chandr Pun
                Jul 20, 2017 at 7:34 pm
                Rddy aka DILIP, as usual your commentas usual is beautiful like your mother. By the way, from which religion would a Parsi convert?
                (0)(0)
                Reply
                1. k
                  k.madhukar
                  Jul 20, 2017 at 7:47 pm
                  Authors ancestors ran away from Persia when Muslim marauders came and did mass conversion. India accepted them , gave shelter and though they are less than lakh, their contribution to nation building is immense. Their religion is not aggressive, they beautifully co exist with us. Muslims should learn from P es and try to live peacefully banning words like Caliphate, Kaffir, non believer etc from their dictionary.
                  (0)(0)
                  1. C
                    Chandra Punkr
                    Jul 20, 2017 at 9:10 pm
                    So, when Rddy calls Mr Keki as "converted baastaards" what was he exposing? His Chaddi? Parsis follow Zoroastrianism which predates Islam. But then his comments are as beautiful as his mom.
                    (0)(0)
                2. Load More Comments