Progress in the making

Unlike earlier initiatives, ‘Make In India’ is addressing the constraints to manufacturing sector growth

Written by Bibek Debroy | Published:June 29, 2017 12:50 am
Make In India, make In india campaign, India's GDP, gross domestic product, industrial profit, IIP, The 2014 “Make in India” has every ingredient of a work in progress, unlike the 2011 NMP, which was work in promise.

In 2016-17, the IIP (index of industrial production) only grew by 5 per cent. Is this all “Make in India” could achieve? Of course, the IIP also includes mining and electricity, though manufacturing has a weight of almost 78 per cent. The manufacturing component of the IIP grew by 4.9 per cent, a little lower than the aggregate. In 2001, there was the report of the National Statistical Commission. Before reacting to the IIP, one should read what this report had to say about its deficiencies. Yes, the new series, with a 2011-12 base, is better, but there is still a problem with the unorganised sector, flagged in 2001.

How about the manufacturing performance in national accounts, now GVA (gross value added)? In real terms, there has been a growth of 10.8 per cent in 2015-16 and 7.9 per cent in 2016-17, though it was 5.5 per cent in 2014-15. Perhaps we want manufacturing to grow at 10 per cent-plus for several years, perhaps we want it to grow at rates higher than GDP/GVA growth, perhaps we want manufacturing’s share in GDP/GVA to increase over time. These are parallel and complementary objectives and we have had this basket of wants since the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948.

Since public memory is short, most people have forgotten the National Manufacturing Policy (NMP), announced in 2011. “The DIPP‘s vision to increase the share of manufacturing in GDP from 16 per cent to 25 per cent was endorsed in the conference of State Industry Ministers on 17 November 2009.” Over the “medium-term”, rate of growth in manufacturing was supposed to increase to 12-14 per cent per annum. The share of manufacturing in GDP was to become 25 per cent by 2022. One hundred million additional jobs were supposed to be created by 2022. The press release that accompanied the NMP stated: “The share of manufacturing in India’s GDP has stagnated at 15-16 per cent since 1980 while the share in comparable economies in Asia is much higher at 25-34 per cent.”

Whether a sectoral share in GDP should be an objective is a moot point. After all, such a relative share is a function of how other sectors perform. For instance, non-manufacturing industry will have a share of 10 per cent, services will presumably have a share of 60 per cent. That leaves 5 per cent for agriculture by 2022. (In 2014-15, at constant prices, agriculture and allied activities had a 16.3 per cent share in GVA, manufacturing 17.3 per cent and services 63.6 per cent.) Three years after the NMP’s announcement in 2011, say in 2014, there wasn’t a general questioning of what had happened. Perhaps people were waiting for the medium-term from 2011, say 11 years down the line, in 2022. The “Make in India” initiative was announced on August 15, 2014. Three years down the line, one should indeed ask what has happened.

What are the constraints to increasing manufacturing’s share to around 20 per cent of the GDP? The constraints themselves suggest solutions. Some constraints are generic, they cut across all manufacturing sectors. Others are more specific and pertain to specific sectors. I will focus on the generic and, therefore, also ignore several sector-specific initiatives under “Make in India”. A National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) was set up in 2005. In 2006, this produced a National Strategy for Manufacturing which listed the following generic issues. One, taxation, both direct and indirect; two, labour laws; three, entry and exit problems; four, administrative laws and complicated procedures; five, credit problems, both cost and availability; six, lack of skills; seven, deterrents against urbanisation and formalisation; and eight, infrastructure constraints. This national strategy apart, several studies exist on what determines, or constrains, investments in states and these too, endorse this list, with law and order thrown in. On infrastructure, the strategy document stated, “Power supply remains the main physical infrastructure bottleneck to industrial growth on account of chronic shortages, high cost and unreliability. The average manufacturer in India loses 8.4 per cent a year in sales on account of power outages as opposed to less than 2 per cent in China and Brazil. The adverse impact on similar units in the unorganised sector could be higher. It is estimated that power shortage alone contributed to a production loss of at least one per cent of GDP.”

With this lens, consider what’s happened since 2014. There have been public investments in highways, railways, inland water transport, ports and airports. There have been power sector (including renewable) reforms and discoms are in better shape. Bad infrastructure increases logistics costs. The World Bank has a Logistics Performance Index, also disaggregated into international shipments, timelines, customs, logistics competence, infrastructure and tracking and tracing. In the 2016 report, across segments, and in the aggregate, scores have improved since 2014 and therefore, so has India’s cross-country rank. The GST has begun the process of unifying indirect taxes. [This makes CVD (countervailing duty) determination easier and probably levels the playing field for domestic manufacturers.]

Small saving rates have been reduced, facilitating lower deposit and lending rates. For MSMEs, there is MUDRA and the Stand Up India window. Labour laws are being unified under four codes (wages, safety, social security, industrial relations). There is a Skill India programme. Many instances of inverted duty structure have been addressed. In addition to the World Bank’s “Doing Business” indicators, DIPP has triggered improvements in ease of doing business in States. Both entry (such as FDI) and exit (such as Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) have been simplified. A public procurement policy has been announced.

The 2014 “Make in India” has every ingredient of a work in progress, unlike the 2011 NMP, which was work in promise.

The writer is member, Niti Aayog. Views are personal

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Arvint
    Jun 30, 2017 at 12:39 am
    Buy made in India products to support jobs and growth... Boycott Chinese product's and buy made in India products. China supports and terrorist with our money..
    Reply
    1. H
      Hanuman
      Jun 30, 2017 at 12:15 am
      "Since public memory is short, most people have forgotten the National Manufacturing Policy (NMP), announced in 2011. " Well, but they do not forget their castes and prejudices.
      Reply
      1. D
        Dr Henry Martin
        Jun 29, 2017 at 8:16 pm
        TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Do you need to raise cash for health care costs or paying debts or in a state of financial breakdown? Wait! Consider selling your kidney as an Option. If you wish to sell or Buy kidney today: Message us immediately. A kidney is bought for a maximum amount of $450,000:00 Dollars.The National foundation is currently buying healthy kidney. My name is Dr Henry Martin, am a Nephrologist in the kidney National hospital. APOLLO HOSPITAL India specialized in Kidney Surgery and we also deal with buying and transplantation of kidneys with a living a corresponding donor. We are located in Indian, Canada, UK, Turkey, USA, Malaysia, South Africa etc. If you are interested in selling or buying kidneys please don’t hesitate to contact us by our maill: apollohospital.1231 Need Geniune Donors Waiting for your responds…. Best Regards Dr Henry Martin Contact: 91-9582172213
        Reply
        1. M
          Mayank
          Jun 29, 2017 at 11:49 pm
          Scammer alert !
          Reply
        2. S
          srinivasansingan
          Jun 29, 2017 at 8:10 pm
          Many house holds shifted to solar power.there will be surplus power in the coming years.It is true if the industry grows there will be shortage of power.But with Pyush who is very efficient in handling power problem..the industry is bound to grow.
          Reply
          1. E
            Employ Ment
            Jun 29, 2017 at 6:42 pm
            योजना ✔मोदी जी द्वारा चलाए गए डिजिटल इन्डिया से जुड़े और 15,000 - 50,000 रुपए ✔अब कोई नही रहेगा बेरोज़गार और नही करेगा कोई बेरोज़गार आत्महत्या ✔क्योंकि अब आ गई है 21वीं सदी की सबसे बड़ी रोज़गार क्रांति ✔हमारा सपना पूरे भारत को ही नही पूरी दुनिया को डिजिटल इंडिया से जोड़ना सबका साथ सबका विकास ➡शुरुवात कैसे करे ✔C.h.a.m.p`C.a.s.h को प्ले स्टोर से इन्स्टल करे, और साइन अप करे, $1 डॉलर बोनस : 468942 ➡चैलेंज को पूरा करे ➡और इंकम करनी शुरू करे 👇🏻इसे जरूर नोट कर ले👇🏻 : 468942 ........................ Uvdhjdjjdhjdjdikd
            Reply
            1. P
              P N
              Jun 29, 2017 at 6:15 pm
              I think the surplus of electricity is because there has been no serious industrial growth. This is a vicious cycle and good luck to the Government to break it. As the Chinese used to say a marginal shortage of electricity is a good indicator that industrial growth is pushing electricity. We are not there yet.
              Reply
              1. S
                Sankaran Krishnan
                Jun 29, 2017 at 4:41 pm
                Yes previously India and most of the States had Power supply problems for the Industries to start manufacturing units whereas now it has changed completely with power surplus India. According to me the problem is with Industries and the Business Persons who had indulged in frauding and cheating the Govt. by making it as SICK companies under BIFR act, whereas they claimed the benefits under BIFR but not revived right from 1990's and if has to go through the Industrial Estate functioning across various Cities they will find how many units started, how many of them closed under BIFR and how many of them changed their hands after availing the benefits and there are some who still hold the Industrial Units expecting good s return for the plots owned by them which was given by the Govts.at throw away prices. With such Business persons and Industrial Units what else can be exepcted and due to theGovt. lethergic at ude they are the silent spectators without taking any action against them
                Reply
                1. I
                  Ivan
                  Jun 29, 2017 at 2:27 pm
                  Make in India defence purchases will go a long way to establish some advanced industries. For that the defence budge has to rise, which I am sure is in the offing, given the aggressive Chinese posturing.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments