Rear view: Lost in Lanka

Rajiv Gandhi’s Colombo policy was flawed. It turned both Tamils and Sinhalese against New Delhi and dented the image of the Indian army.

Written by Inder Malhotra | Published:January 19, 2015 12:59 am
 Rajiv Gandhi, Sri Lanka, LTTE,  Sri Lanka Tamils, Rajiv Gandhi’s Colombo policy was flawed. It turned both Tamils and Sinhalese against New Delhi and dented the image of the Indian army.

By the middle of 1987, Rajiv Gandhi was besieged by many domestic problems of extreme gravity. Yet he decided to mediate in the catastrophic ethnic strife in neighbouring Sri Lanka between the ruling Sinhala majority and the highly aggrieved Tamil minority concentrated in the northern and eastern regions of the island republic. The problem had begun long ago, when the Sinhala-dominated government imposed Sinhala as the only language of the country, and it escalated so fast as to become nearly intractable. India’s policy on Sri Lanka, which Rajiv inherited from his mother, was as complex as the situation in the island.

Indira Gandhi did not like the efforts of Sri Lanka’s veteran and wily executive president, J.R. Jayewardene, to draw in the United States, some west European countries and Israel, to help out with his difficulties. She wanted the problem of Sri Lanka to be resolved with Indian assistance without any “any foreign intrusion”. So she had seen to it that her foreign policy advisor, G. Parthasarathy, and a nominee of Jayewardene worked out an arrangement for devolution of power to the Tamil minority in Sri Lanka that would be acceptable to the Sinhala majority also. The effort remained a work in progress. At the same time, she was keen to ensure that Sri Lankan Tamils did not feel let down by India. There was so much sympathy and support for them in Tamil Nadu that they could use the Indian state as a safe haven and also a training field, with the Central government benignly looking away.

Rajiv did not like this and changed the policy. Meanwhile, of the various Tamil groups resisting Sinhala domination, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) emerged as the most influential and powerful. Eelam in the name stood for complete independence. This was the brainchild of its leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran who, as the world witnessed, was a “brutal fighter”.

The old fox, Jayewardene, was usually in awe of Indira. But he found it easy to deal with her son and successor. Fairly early during their negotiations, the two agreed on a new approach. The Sri Lankan government had so isolated the northern Tamil area as to virtually force India to do some “bread bombing” of Jaffna to enable the starving people to eat. Yet, the two sides broke new ground soon enough. New Delhi and Colombo decided to sign an agreement on solving the problem and to cajole or coerce the LTTE to accept it. The Rajiv-Jayewardene accord was duly inked on July 29 in Colombo in an immensely tense atmosphere. But, as Rajiv’s MoS for External Affairs K. Natwar Singh (who later became foreign minister) has recorded in his autobiography, One Life Is Not Enough, its implementations created more problems than it solved.

In the first place, even while the agreement was being signed, Sri Lanka’s prime minister, R. Premadasa, and a senior minister, Lalith Athulathmudali, made no secret of their opposition to it. Something even more startling happened a little later. Seeing that Jayewardene was talking seriously to Rajiv surrounded only by Sri Lankan officials, Foreign Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao asked Natwar Singh to go and find out what was afoot. Rajiv told him that Colombo was a besieged city and Jayewardene feared that there might be a coup before nightfall. So he had asked for an Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) immediately. To Natwar’s question of whether he would like to consult his senior colleagues before sending troops, Rajiv replied that he had already ordered a division of the army to get to Colombo as fast as possible.

Before signing the agreement, Rajiv had sent for Prabhakaran in Delhi, and was apparently satisfied with the LTTE supremo’s verbal acceptance of the draft accord. Tamil Nadu’s hugely popular chief minister, M.G. Ramachandaran, was also in Delhi and reportedly gave Prabhakaran a lot of money. However, when asked to surrender arms, as required by the July 29 accord, the LTTE insisted on a series of preconditions, including the release of all Tamil prisoners in government custody and a halt to Sinhala colonisation of the island’s eastern region. How terribly high the Sinhala rage against Indian intervention in their country was became known at the time of Rajiv’s departure for home. At the guard of honour, a Lankan soldier tried to hit him with the stem of his gun. The prime minister’s youthful reflexes saved his life. At the Bandaranaike International Airport, the Sri Lankan prime minister was conspicuous by his absence. When asked about this “discourtesy”, Rajiv blandly replied: “Some presidents have a problem with their prime ministers, and some prime ministers have a problem with their presidents.” The latter part of the statement was a clear reference to his row with the then president, Giani Zail Singh.

For a short while, an uneasy peace lasted in Sri Lanka. But even the Tamils of that country turned against India because the IPKF had to storm and capture the LTTE headquarters in Jaffna, though at a high cost. Several IPKF commanders have written books about the often vague and even contradictory instructions from Delhi. This should explain why the much-respected Indian army suffered a dent in its image. Over a thousand Indian soldiers were killed. In 1989, when Rajiv was defeated in the election, Premadasa had replaced Jayewardene as Lanka’s president. He lost no time in demanding the IPKF’s withdrawal. The new Indian prime minister, V.P. Singh, was happy to undo what Rajiv had done. When the first batch of the IPKF landed in Chennai, no one in the Tamil Nadu government was willing to receive it. Only the governor, P.C. Alexander, welcomed them.

Even more sadly, there is no memorial for the IPKF anywhere in India. Only the Sri Lankans have built one in Colombo. Evidently, they realise that India spilled blood and spent from its treasury to save their country’s unity.

The writer is a Delhi-based political commentator

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. M
    Mv V
    Jan 19, 2015 at 5:34 am
    Clearly, we are rewriting history now. Rajiv hi was the Prime Minister of India and whether he liked it or not Tamils are Indians. It was his job to intervene when people of Indian descent were being cuted because that is why he was appointed. Instead of creating a meaningful accord that would give the ordinary Tamils an opportunity to be an actual part of Sri Lankan society and corralling the LTTE, he clearly sided with the Sinhalese government and had a press conference, where he arrogantly fired Venkateswaran, the Foreign Secretary. Even as a young person watching the fiasco on TV, I remember feeling incensed at his atude towards a hard working career diplomat whose career was being destro in front of millions of people. He then posed in some fancy vehicle, like he was directing the police action. Everything went downhill after that, with the LTTE destroying all the other Tamil organizations, the Tamils were stuck between the LTTE and the government. Tamil genocide was the result including killing of unarmed young children and yet the Sri Lankan government did nothing to heal the chasm.
    Reply
    1. M
      Mv V
      Jan 19, 2015 at 9:22 pm
      Sending a peace keeping force that actually was supporting Sinhalese against the Tamils was the wrong action. It was like ensuring that a molested child is handed over to the molester. Colombo's relationship with China is based on the fact that China is not only very powerful but also the big money coming in to Colombo. If Colombo treated Chinese the way Sri Lanka treated the Tamils, believe me, Colombo will be trembling at China's wrath and the same is true for Europe or United States.
      Reply
      1. A
        Anil
        Jan 19, 2015 at 10:18 am
        By 1986 it was quite clear that we had elected a walking disaster as PM. A lot of the mess created by this hi, at home and abroad, which cast a long shadow on the country, was subsequently cleared up by Narasimha Rao and later by AB Vajpayee. And the Congress still wants Rahul, who is even less capable than his father, to lead them and the country. Must it always be the dynasty? Lets look at what PVNR faced-- red hot insurgencies in Punjab and Kashmir, the constant hectoring and pressure by the USA under Clinton who at first tilted towards stan, the fallout of the Mandal and Ram Temple movements, a balance of payment crisis and economic emergency, just to name a few. And he came through. The Congress should realize they have far better leaders available than Rahul or Priyanka, who are no leaders at all.
        Reply
        1. B
          Brijkhanna
          Jan 19, 2015 at 5:16 pm
          President Giani Zail Singh sworn Rajeev hi immediately after the ination of Mrs Indra hi as a gesture of his loyalty to Mrs Indra hi. He was under impression that inexperienced as Rajeev was , he would be just a puppet Prime Minister. He drew this conviction from "S Brothers" after demise of Aurangzeb. Rajeev hi duly isted by "Loyalists" of Mrs Indra hi could manage to rein in Zail Singh ambitions but could not show his mettle as Chief Executive of Government of India. He was a failure in the art of governance and was surrounded by his willy friends and shrewd insincere advisers of his mother.He boasted to signed three major pacts during his speech from Red Fort one was Rajeev hi Longowal Agreement ( which died without even executed a bit) Two. Hisagreement with am Gantantra Prishad of am which did not last long Three India-Ceylone Treaty which ultimately caused his own tragic death.While Rajeev was naive in politics and weak administrative having poor judgement of his colleagues, so is his son Rahul hi. With the death of Rajeev hi Coalition Government Era started since 1989 and Congress got its worst humiliation as not being officially recognized as Opposition Party who can legally claim Leader of Opposition status, Rahul may succeed in making Congress just an another EXTRA ARTIST with hardly more than ten seats in 2019. Provided Modi performs to peoples expectations.Rajeev hi not only made all our neighboring countries hostile but made them "Nurseries of our two so called adversely China and stanWe need strong, independent and friendly neighbors in BANGLADESH SRI Lanka, Myanmar, .Nepal, Bhutan.
          Reply
          1. K
            KUMAR
            Jan 19, 2015 at 6:48 am
            NEHRU WITHDREW FROM LA IN THE INDO PAK WAR I JUST TO GAIN APPLAUSE AT THE UNINDIRA CREATED THE LTTE JUST TO GAIN PUBLICITY. RAJIV ORDEREDTHE IPKF TO EELAM JUST TO GAIN PUBLICITY.THIS DYNASTY HAS LITERALLY LIVED FOR PUBLICITY PEOPLE BE ED.
            Reply
            1. G
              Gopal
              Jan 19, 2015 at 4:30 am
              Crazy stuff. Total incompetence by India. Once again the hi family proved that they did not really understand India and her neighbours. It is true even now with the two Congress leaders Sonia and Rahul. What will they do in a complex international situation?
              Reply
              1. H
                Harsh
                Jan 19, 2015 at 7:34 am
                Considering current scenario of dominance of China on Colombo clearly indicates that theRajiv hi policy was correct. It is different thing that American solider can stay in gulf at high temperature to protect their interest whereas we start crying over few casualties. It was the major chance for us to take strong control over economical affairs of south and south-east Asia that we miss to China. In fact, it was our first outing after Asoka that became victim of our petty internal politics.
                Reply
                1. J
                  James Whitaker
                  Jan 19, 2015 at 7:28 am
                  No he was just stupid!
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments