Taking Off

Contrary to official claims, Tejas is a winner

Written by Bharat Karnad | Updated: February 15, 2016 12:12 am
LCA-tejas759 Tejas, a 4.5 generation aircraft like Rafale, has always been underfunded by government and undermined by the IAF with periodic rewriting of ASRs.

For an indigenous light combat aircraft (LCA) disparaged by the Indian Air Force brass as “overweight”, “underpowered”, “obsolete”, “a three-legged cheetah” and, in technical terms, as a plane that “cannot fly without telemetry, pull more than 6G or an angle-of-attack (AoA) greater than 20 degrees” and “with an air intake that starves the engine”, is supposedly afflicted with “53 identified shortfalls”, and fails to meet the “minimum air staff requirements (ASRs)”, the Tejas, entirely unreported by the Indian media, performed phenomenally well at the recent Bahrain International Air Show. It has silenced the naysayers. The minimum that this success ought to do is get the government to reconsider the deal with France, because the fact is Tejas’ future will be inversely affected by the Rafale deal. If one is up, the other is out.

The LCA’s composites-built airframe and small size enhance its stealth features, translating into a small radar signature and the greatest difficulty for enemy aircraft to detect it. Bahrain proved that fighting quality. There can be no complaints.

Price-wise, India is willing to pay only $7 billion, France expects $11 bn. To put these figures in perspective, the Rafale programme was originally pegged at $10 bn for 126 aircraft, including transfer of technology (ToT). So how come, after reducing the demand for Rafales by two-thirds and deducting 18 per cent of the cost as value of ToT, the new price tag exceeds the original cost by a billion dollars? Worse, Paris is disinclined to offer sovereign guarantee regarding the delivery timeline and spares supply but is prepared to provide a letter from President Francois Hollande, which is worth nothing. Yet, the defence ministry is reconciled to forking out Rs 63,000 crore for 36 Rafales. This works out to Rs 1,750 crore or nearly $270 million per aircraft — a sum that could fetch three Tejas or two Sukhoi-30 MKIs, rated the best combat aircraft in the world.

Tejas, a 4.5 generation aircraft like Rafale, has always been underfunded by government and undermined by the IAF with periodic rewriting of ASRs. Three years ago, for instance, a mid-air refuelling probe was included, necessitating aircraft redesign that cost time, money and delays in the certification and induction cycles.

Scarcity of money is the real problem and requires making hard choices. Should the Indian government commit Rs. 63,000 crore to the Tejas and Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programmes rather than sustaining the French aviation industry, it will signal serious intent, bring the streamlined Defence Production Policy-2016 guidelines into play, permitting the DRDO to transfer source codes and flight control laws to Indian private-sector companies, incentivise small- and medium-scale technology innovation companies comprising an Indian mittelstand to take root, motivate foreign suppliers of components and assemblies that currently comprise 70 per cent of Tejas to manufacture these in India and, conjoined to a policy pushing its export, germinate a viable, comprehensively capable, aerospace sector-led Indian defence industrial growth. This infusion of funds will fast-track the synergistic development of follow-on versions of Tejas, its navalised variant, along with the AMCA, and the fifth generation fighter project in partnership with Russia. It will be the cutting-edge of a “Made in India” policy showcasing indigenous capability.

With Rafale facing production problems — only eight aircraft were outputted in 2014 — all the contracted Rafales won’t be in IAF service before 2030. It is not the answer to India’s immediate need. A more economical solution that will also satisfy the IAF’s apparent craving for French aircraft is to procure the 30-plus upgraded Mirage 2000-9s the United Arab Emirates want to be rid of, and a third Mirage squadron (with 80 per cent of its life intact) available from Qatar. Infrastructure already exists to service and operate the Mirages. It will not complicate the logistics nightmare created by the diversity of combat aircraft in the IAF’s inventory, which Rafale’s entry will do.

 

The writer is professor in national security studies at the Centre for Policy Research and author of ‘Why India is Not a Great Power (Yet)’

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Ajitdada
    Feb 15, 2016 at 4:46 am
    The Tejas design is hardy vis a vis the Rafael or any equivalent Europian/US plane. Most of the western designs seek a lot of precision handling and a team of caretakers, just alike an ICU. Where as we followed the Russian designs which is more rugged, hardy, less support and molly cuddling. I believe govt. is awakened now and putting more resources and funds will get a best India flying machine made for our strategic goals.
    Reply
    1. G
      Guru
      Feb 15, 2016 at 2:30 pm
      Excellent synopsis.
      Reply
      1. P
        Praful vora
        Feb 15, 2016 at 12:11 am
        We need planes now not 10 years from now we are far behind China and nowstan area wise and potion wise
        Reply
        1. K
          K SHESHU
          Feb 15, 2016 at 11:38 am
          The Centre is concentrating on buying foreign defence equipment rather than developing indigenous industry by employing native workforce. The constant thrust on 'make in India' is an eyewash!!!
          Reply
          1. M
            Mavala
            Feb 15, 2016 at 8:46 am
            Good choice by IE, now let IAF respind. Excellent points made by the writer.
            Reply
            1. S
              SK
              Feb 15, 2016 at 3:44 am
              Very well explained. Let our force get used to what we have got. Again it would be made in India. Ironically the engineers working in US in the defense industry are Indians. If they can do wonderful things here why not in India. Sixty years of congress rule has done irreparable damage to India. It is ironical that after 3 months of Modi rule Rahul started asking where are ache din.
              Reply
              1. R
                Raj
                Feb 15, 2016 at 4:37 am
                The men and officers in defence forces are mad for foreign weapons simply because they get to have a few paid holidays. There is a strong arms import lobby that is working against the domestic players and industry. Forget about LCA which involves cutting edge technology that is not india's strength ; just see the way army scuttled INSAS. It is rated very good else where but in India. Also see much simpler case of artillery guns which is hardly beyond industry capabilities. See also Arjun MBT. The government needs to put its foot down and ask the forces to do with indegenous weapon system.
                Reply
                1. D
                  disgusted
                  Feb 15, 2016 at 3:46 am
                  Fmain issue here is the painfully long wait. Wouldn't IAF question the capability of LCA project if after 35 years into development not a single fight Worthy Tejas aircraft has been produced so far??
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments