Let’s not go back in time

Suspending democracy, imposing governor’s rule, would undo political progress in Kashmir

Written by Wajahat Habibullah | Published:April 18, 2017 12:58 am
Srinagar violence, Srinagar bypolls protest, srinagar bypolls, Srinagar bypolls postponed, Election Commission on Srinagar bypolls, Budgam bypolls, srinagar by elections, jammu kashmir, kashmir, latest news In Srinagar, where fear was pervasive, Mohammed Shafi Bhat, then of the National Conference, won uncontested.

In November 1989, as Kashmir teetered on the edge of insurgency, elections were held to the Lok Sabha in Baramulla and Anantnag. The turnout was 5 per cent, the lowest ever. In Srinagar, where fear was pervasive, Mohammed Shafi Bhat, then of the National Conference, won uncontested. On April 14, 2017, the turnout in the repoll in 38 polling booths to the Srinagar assembly constituency, contested by one who might be described as the tallest leader of Kashmir’s mainstream — read Indian national — politics, saw a turnout of 2 per cent, 709 of 31,000 eligible voters cast their votes.

In 27 of the 38 booths, there was no vote at all. The main election on April 9 had recorded a turnout of less than 8 per cent. There had been firing by the CRPF which caused the death of eight youth. If the low turnout in 1989 was due to fear of the gun, in 2017, it was Kashmir’s own youth who spilled out to deter prospective voters. There was even an instance of the security forces cowering behind a young Kashmiri strapped to a jeep as a shield. In response, the Election Commission of India postponed the Anantnag election, scheduled for April 12 to May 25. Do we Indians get the message?

Clearly, democracy in Kashmir has reached such a nadir that it is unable to operate even its most basic function, which is to hold elections. Instead of this arousing concern across India — the erosion of what should be our most prized asset in what should have been its showpiece — we witness indignation against those who have chosen to express themselves. The EC was criticised for taking the risk of holding elections in the troubled vale. Mainstream political parties and the Home Ministry reportedly advised the EC against holding the election, even though elections to both Anantnag and Srinagar were overdue.

It will be recalled that in 1996, elections were held to the Jammu and Kashmir assembly after a spell of governor’s rule that had lasted since January 1990. I had been commissioner, Kashmir, twice in that period, a tour of duty cut short by a near-fatal accident. But through my long recovery, I had consistently responded to Prime Minister Narasimha Rao with advice that the governance of the state must return to its people.

The election of 1996 was the outcome and although the period since has been anything but peaceful, the practice of democracy has only improved with increasing participation in the election process, and since 2002, resulted in the repeated supplanting of a sitting government through the electoral process. The increasing public participation in governance, even when voter turnout has been low by national standards, reflected in the inclusion of even the separatists in dialogue with the highest levels of the Indian government, a process initiated by Prime Minster Atal Bihari Vajpayee through his pointperson R.K. Mishra.

The fact that all the separatist and mainstream groups were engaged in discussing different forms of autonomy that could help settle the Kashmir issue enabled Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to declare in his Independence Day speech of 2013 that separatism had been overcome. This was the process that had helped the scion of a leading family of separatists to be absorbed in the political mainstream. And he was not alone. That Sajjad Lone is today a minister in the state cabinet and leader of his own political party makes him the most recognisable example of this trend.

Kashmir’s political establishment had pleaded for deferring the elections to June, until the civic polls got over. There have also been calls for the imposition of governor’s rule in the state, which simply would be an abdication of responsibility. The purpose of restoring democracy in 1996 was to give back to its people the authority to form their own government under the Constitution. That the political mainstream has failed to marshal the people is no reason to surrender governance to the Centre. There is no guarantee that the situation on May 25 or indeed in June will be any more conducive to elections.

Indeed, there is no guarantee that given the present environment, the civic polls will attract wide participation. The responsibility clearly lies with the Kashmiri political leadership to place the nation’s interest above party compulsions. The question now is not who might govern, but the trajectory that the will of its people, the fragile thread that binds Kashmir to India through the institution of democracy, will take.

A group of citizens, distressed by the outbreak of protests in Kashmir continuing unabated since July 8, 2016, and costing many precious lives, all of which are Indian, met in Delhi in September, 2016 to work for peace through the process of dialogue. We watched with grave foreboding as Kashmir descended into turmoil. Nearly a hundred people had died and many others were injured. Regrettably, most of the casualties have been young people, even children, many of whom could have been future leaders.

To our alarm, we heard from the youth their disregard of even the threat of death, which we were to find demonstrated in the field as well. Yet there has been no accountability thus far; resentment will continue to fester until there is. Is this, then, a generation lost? The restoration of democracy can be achieved only by ensuring the participation of Kashmiris in governance. A movement in this direction can be initiated only through dialogue, a feature of the present coalition government’s Agenda of Alliance. Kashmir, like the rest of India, has institutions to enable social and political inclusion; and without inclusive governance, I see no hope.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. S
    Sudheer Thaakur
    Apr 19, 2017 at 1:14 am
    how long are we going to live in denial. the struggle in kashmir valley is of kashmiri muslims for establishing a sharia compliant state? why talk of democracy when democracy, essentially a pluralistic construct, is incompatible with ideology of islam.
    Reply
    1. S
      Seshubabu Kilambi
      Apr 18, 2017 at 7:47 pm
      For restoration of democracy, the rulers should lusten to the youth. When the youth are being utterly disregarded and tortured, democracy is already stands suspended
      Reply
      1. M
        MK
        Apr 18, 2017 at 6:20 pm
        A voice of experience and wisdom.
        Reply
        1. K
          Krishnan Ram
          Apr 18, 2017 at 4:57 pm
          I would prefer the Government withdraws its army in consultation with the political parties there and and watch the fun. We have got many very important things to do. Look to India.
          Reply
          1. S
            Sekhar
            Apr 18, 2017 at 4:40 pm
            It is only Morarji Bhai, Narasimha Rao, Atalji and Narendra Bhai who have held free and fair elections in Kashmir. The rest of India has been luckier that fair elections have been held consistently since 1952. The only way forward is to ure more democracy. The extremist and stan know victory is ured if democracy is murdered. It is the duty of all mainstream political parties PDP, NC, BJP and INC to restore and deepen democracy in Kashmir rather than pull each other down.
            Reply
            1. V
              vnksk
              Apr 18, 2017 at 3:43 pm
              Progress is a good joke. Terrorists and pattharwaz r the signs of that progress? Abdullah becoming pattharwaz with security cover, separatists being pampered r other landmarks of the progress.
              Reply
              1. B
                Burman
                Apr 18, 2017 at 3:22 pm
                Leaders of Nation in 1947, whom people backed at that moment, promised something to Kashmiri people. It is a part of the const i tution. Till people of Kashmir felt that their mandate was not reneged, 1980s both communities could live peacefully. Mother and Son duo of Indira/Rajiv sent their henchman and result is visible. Unless situation reaches that level again, there can be containment but not a solution of this problem.
                Reply
                1. A
                  Awadh Jha
                  Apr 18, 2017 at 2:53 pm
                  The respected top bureocrat has rightly placed the facts before the country & the people of Kashmir. What is at stake if Kashmir separists win? This is the question that should be debated by all, I say including stan. That stan was created on the theology that Muslims can not be ruled by Quafir majority in a democratic situation in India. And the so called unfinished agenda of stan is all about fermenting trouble in muslim majority areas of India in various ways. The Indians & the Kashmiries have to think about the possible scenerios if the Jehadi thought proces of kashmir separists takes away kashmir valley from India. I shiver by the thought of what had happened in 1947 when stan was created . Hope people of Kashmir should not be blind while supporting the jehadis.
                  Reply
                  1. B
                    Burman
                    Apr 18, 2017 at 3:26 pm
                    Even in 1947, J&K was the only state without large scale riots where Muslims, Hindus, Sikh managed to maintain social amity and harmony.
                    Reply
                  2. U
                    Utpal Kumar
                    Apr 18, 2017 at 1:56 pm
                    This article is all about part of J&K and not represent full picture on ground. We need to make Kashmir velly union territory and jammu and Laddakh separate state. Only because of religions driven so called Kashmir velly leaders should not be allowed to decide fate of Jammu and Laddakh as well. So here is 3 step solution, first impose Governor rule; second issue ordinance to divide state and third declare Kashmir union territory so Kashmir can have gr root democracy like civic body but not so called National leader.
                    Reply
                    1. V
                      Virender
                      Apr 18, 2017 at 1:51 pm
                      "The responsibility clearly lies with the Kashmiri political leadership to place the nation’s interest above party compulsions" - Fully agree with it.
                      Reply
                      1. B
                        Burman
                        Apr 18, 2017 at 3:31 pm
                        Kashmiri political leadership was defined by PDP in 2014.
                        Reply
                      2. N
                        N S
                        Apr 18, 2017 at 12:59 pm
                        This man was and is with separatists/jihadis for a long time including the period in which religious cleansing of Hindus took place in the valley. Now look at what he has deliberately not said 1. It is an Islamic jehadi war that is being waged in Kashmir. 2.Once we allow this to succeed it will spread to other parts of India. Take a look at the world map and let these dishonest people say what is the fate of other religionists once muslims start ruling that country. let this man go and persuade his fellow religionists to allow Yezdis to live in peace.
                        Reply
                        1. A
                          akbar khan
                          Apr 18, 2017 at 11:51 am
                          This man battened off the system for decades. He has been a poseur giving himself airs and writing as if he were the bee's knees. Note that, in this article also, he offers no solution, only banal statements that count for nothing.
                          Reply
                          1. B
                            brk
                            Apr 18, 2017 at 12:55 pm
                            very true
                            Reply
                          2. M
                            Mahender Goriganti
                            Apr 18, 2017 at 8:26 am
                            There was never a political progress in Kashmir other than for using the separatist and terrorists t gain power and play around.
                            Reply
                            1. A
                              ak dev
                              Apr 18, 2017 at 7:48 am
                              Jammu and Laddak is suffering because of separatists in Kashmir. First Separate Kashmir from the rest of the state of J&K.
                              Reply
                              1. U
                                Umar Jan Uj
                                Apr 18, 2017 at 8:16 am
                                Wonderful Suggestion It should be done as soon as possible
                                Reply
                                1. G
                                  Ghajabiram
                                  Apr 18, 2017 at 10:46 am
                                  Separate Kashmir from Jammu and Ladakh and make Kashmir a Union territory under Centre's control. Probably even make it an army cantonment bringing it under Army. Dilute Article 370 and the legitimacy of J&K Cons ution. Over pampering has led to people of Kashmir uming Indian state will play to the whims and fancies of the Islamists
                                  Reply
                                  1. V
                                    vnksk
                                    Apr 18, 2017 at 3:47 pm
                                    Agree except Kashmir should be UT under Army control without​370 and full freedom to army.
                                2. M
                                  Mahender Goriganti
                                  Apr 18, 2017 at 7:40 am
                                  I know a lot of underhand jihadi minded will come out with all kinds of theories & explanations to continue with what has not worked before. Bottom-line is , they all have failed, especially so is irrelevant in the new world of Jihadi culture all over the world. It must be dealt with as such as we deal with demons
                                  Reply
                                  1. S
                                    Sitaram
                                    Apr 18, 2017 at 7:25 am
                                    Good advice.. let Kashmiris handle their affairs through elections, parti ting or not parti ting by their choice. Whatever the outcomem it will be of their own making. In a way, proper rejoinder to Mr. Chidambram's article insisting on governor's rule.
                                    Reply
                                    1. Load More Comments