Every hour of prime time TV news aggression pushes Kashmir a mile westward from India

There is an urgent need for India to reclaim “national interest” from its national media.

Written by Shah Faesal | Updated: July 20, 2016 4:32 pm
kashmir, kashmir protest, kashmir violence, burhan wani killing, media on kashmir protest, media coverage on kashmir protest, kashmir protest media coverage, kashmir curfew, curfew in kashmir, kashmiri residents, terror in kashmir, kashmiri muslims, national interest in media coverage, zee news debate, kashmir debate, zee news kashmir debate, media insensitivity, kashmir coverage, indian army in kashmir, role of indian army in kashmir, condition of people in kashmir, selective coverage by indian media, selective kashmir coverage by indian media, indian express news, indian express column, column Illustration by: C R Sasikumar

On the afternoon of July 13, my one-year-old child was finding it difficult to sleep because the adjacent curfewed street had been rattling with a sinister medley of azadi slogans and tear-gas explosions since daybreak. In a conflict zone, introduction to violence is a part of a child’s baptism. So here I was witnessing the exact moment when my child was getting marked as a Kashmiri — the tabula rasa of his mind impacted by history, much before he would be circumcised and officially marked as a Muslim. Kashmir had knocked at his conscience much before Islam. Three decades ago, I was in a similar moment with my father stroking me to sleep while mortar shells were pounding the hills in our backyard. Interestingly, the afternoon marked yet another familiar yet bloody rendezvous between the Valley’s past and present — it was 85th Martyr’s day. But the street unrest had a rather unusual trigger this time — the death of a young militant commander at Kokernag on July 8.

WATCH VIDEO: Kashmir Protests Victim: 5-Year Old Zohra On How She Got Hit

 

Also read | Hilal Mir writes, Why Kashmiri media is muzzled

Around the same time, I was alerted by an unknown caller that Zee News had been running a marathon discussion for past two days on the current crisis, and my photographs and videos were also being juxtaposed with the visuals, dead and alive, of young local militants from Kashmir, as some sort of a clash of role models.

It perturbed me a lot — not only for the sheer insensitivity and shallowness with which this was being done but also for the security risk that it posed to my life. I was puzzled because with a Rs 50,000 monthly salary and a Rs 50 lakh housing loan I was certainly not the best example of a successful Kashmiri youngster.

Also by Shah Faesal, Till ‘Azadi’ comes

More so when the only measure of greatness here is the size of one’s funeral procession. Who would want to die for Rs 50,000 and die unattended, at that. My fears were proven right: Soon, I was told, there was a huge mob outside our colony, rallying against the remarks of the Zee News anchor asking the dead militants to be burnt along with garbage instead of being buried in India’s land; the studio and the street were competing with each other.

WATCH VIDEO: Kashmir Protests: Visuals Of Curfew In the State

 

Next day, I left for my office, incognito, wearing a kurta-pyjama and a farmer’s cap, hopping across check posts like a thief, knowing well that if a group of enraged youngsters recognised me, I might be in trouble, and rightly so, for falling on the wrong side of the Kashmiri vs Indian binary at such a critical juncture. Abusive comments on my Facebook wall had the same refrain.

In the last few years, a section of the national media has been misrepresenting the idea of India in Kashmir, as part of a business strategy. It has also been projecting lies about Kashmir to rest of the country. It happened in 2008, in 2010, and in 2014. So there is nothing surprising about the tilt and the timing of this debate.

Almost all the programmes on Kashmir right now are aimed to provoke people, the coverage is selective, and intention appears to be to compound the problems for the state government. The print media, though, has always maintained balance.

What made the current round of commercial savagery by a few news channels even more tragic was that they continued to promote falsehoods, dividing people, creating hatred, completely disregarding the values of democracy and secularism, even when people were dying and the government was trying hard to calm down people’s passions. It did not stop even after appeals were made to de-escalate. This brazenness to market TRPs as national interest and do business over the dead bodies of young men was the worst aspect of these loud newsrooms.

Watch Video: What’s making news

 

Kashmir or no Kashmir, the biggest challenge for India, this time, is how to reclaim the custody of “national interest” from its national media, and restore communication with its neighbours and people. I have no hesitation in saying that Zee News, Times Now, NewsX and Aaj Tak are at the vanguard of a movement that will take India from a dialogical civilisation to a dumb, illogical civilisation.

In the Indian tradition, the state is supposed to communicate with its people through accommodation, not harangue, and through welfare, not violence. Ashoka put together a network of pillars and edicts to communicate with his people. During the Mughal rule, Diwan e Aam also symbolised direct communication between the state and its subjects. The firmans could only be issued by the sovereign, not by scribes and minstrels, as is the case today. In the Islamic tradition, too, truth, patience and perseverance are central to communicating. As a confluence of Indo-Islamic experience, Kashmir needs a mix of honesty, truth and directness. Communication that divides will only hurt India’s case further.

When we are looking for the causes of the ongoing unrest, we must also look at how we have outsourced, or rather abdicated, communications to TV channels, which are only interested in provoking and alienating. The Indian state can’t afford to leave the Kashmir project to intellectual renegades, political turncoats, opportunists, intelligence agencies, and most importantly, to self-appointed vigilantes of the national interest.

In Kashmir, people often confuse the outrageous editorial policy of the national media with the oppressive state policy. When Kashmiri representatives are bullied in TV debates, their aspirations ridiculed, their grievances shouted down, the symbols of Kashmiri pride insulted, or when non-issues are given precedence over the killing of the innocents, when military bravado is encouraged over civilian agony, when positive initiatives of the state government are overlooked, and truth is not shown at all, and most importantly, when cows are made to feel more important than the Kashmiri people, the frustration and anger will, expectedly, be directed against India. Every hour of prime time TV news aggression pushes Kashmir a mile westward from India.

It may not be easy to intervene or even shut down these mirror-houses of hateful journalism because there are constitutional safeguards for freedom of speech. But the unity and integrity of the country is a far bigger imperative and we will have to restore the original, traditional and additional channels of communication between Delhi and Srinagar that can cut down the noise and bile, and make newsroom nationalism irrelevant. We may as well have to convince these media houses to tone down their jingoistic rhetoric and pay heed to the feedback from the ground.

Ask teenagers in Srinagar and they will tell you how all these years India has been communicating to Kashmiris through rigged elections, dismissal of elected governments, through encounters and corruption. They will tell you how India has become synonymous with a military bunker or a police vehicle or a ranting panelist on prime time television. Is this the idea of India which can win Kashmiri hearts? Accepting what India and its symbols stand for in the eyes of a Kashmiri is the first step towards untangling this Gordian knot.

Kashmiris are very sensitive people. But they are by nature sceptics as well. Any dialogue with Kashmiris will bear fruit only in an atmosphere of warmth and will have to be done on equal terms, not as ehsan. The prime minister, who has single-handedly transformed India’s global image, should take upon himself the task of transforming India’s image in Kashmir.

(This article first appeared in the print edition under the headline “Between the studio and the street.”)

The writer, an IAS officer, is director, school education, Kashmir. Views are personal

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. H
    Henry Goh
    Jan 4, 2017 at 9:18 am
    Fidelity Loan Finance is a government approved credit firm, we give out loans to individuals and organizations with an interest rate of 2% world wide. Get back to me if you are interested fore further details through this mail box:
    Reply
    1. L
      Luciana Albert
      Mar 14, 2017 at 3:56 pm
      LOAN OFFER‎lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Good day Sir/Madam,‎lt;br/gt;Getting a loan from Grayson Investments Company is 100% ured and the legitimacy of the transaction is 100% Guaranteed. email: or contact: 1 (219) 9909-186 Legitimate loan have always There was a huge problem for people with financial problem and need a solution. Question credit and collateral lt;br/gt;are sometimes clients are always worried about When seeking a loan from a legitimate lender.‎lt;br/gt;Our services include in the following:‎lt;br/gt;Debt consolidation*lt;br/gt;second mortgage*lt;br/gt;Business loans*lt;br/gt;Personal Loans*lt;br/gt;International credits*lt;br/gt;Student loans*lt;br/gt;Family credit*lt;br/gt;For more details go to purchase loan, contact us Please respond immediately to this email: or contact 1(219) 9909-186 Please ‎ note that the credit is issued in the amount of 3% interest, kindly get back to us now, if You are interested.‎lt;br/gt;‎
      Reply
      1. A
        Abhinav Gour
        Jul 20, 2016 at 12:20 pm
        Well written article by a very responsible Kashmiri - Leadership of country must raise to the occation and handle the issue with upmost care. We as a nation also need to understand the anger with our own youth. Instead of put blame on sthan for all problems in Kashmir. we should ourselves consider that this is our internal issue and not of sthan. Let us do the right things first - Let PM handles the Kashmir Problem and Military handles the sthan and NOT other way round
        Reply
        1. A
          Abhinav Gour
          Jul 19, 2016 at 2:13 am
          Communication and conflict are integral. Communication can creat conflict but can be resolved through communication.
          Reply
          1. A
            Anurag
            Jul 19, 2016 at 5:50 pm
            Editor is an educated Kashmiri fool(Regret my tax money was wasted on such a garbage).No matter what Kashmir is inalienable from India.
            Reply
            1. P
              pushpraj singh
              Aug 18, 2016 at 4:32 pm
              Insightful article..
              Reply
              1. S
                Shiva
                Jul 22, 2016 at 5:08 am
                stan is an accident of history.
                Reply
                1. S
                  Shiva
                  Jul 22, 2016 at 5:07 am
                  Your country wont last that long.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments