India shining, Part 2

Government must not ignore the warning signs. It needs to double its overall support to farmers and move from price policy to direct income support.

Written by Ashok Gulati , Prerna Terway | Published:November 10, 2015 12:03 am
india, indian farmers, farmer policies, anti farmer policies, farmers protest, narendra modi, nda govt, modi nda, nda farmer policies, Reports from drought-affected states suggest significant losses in agriculture.

It was farmer leader Sharad Joshi who propagated the usage of “India”, representing urban elites, and “Bharat” for neglected rural folks in the mid-1980s. He was leading lakhs of farmers protesting against anti-farmer policies, ranging from export controls to movement restrictions, from stocking limits on agri-produce to low agri-prices, etc.

He wanted to free up agriculture from government controls. He succeeded only partially. Today, policymaking seems to be heading in the same direction — towards urban elites, and to the neglect of Bharat. Once again, the urban elites in policymaking are celebrating, with India climbing up four positions in the World Bank’s ease of doing business rankings. This is being cited as a major achievement, given that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has promised to bring India into the top 50 in his first term.

This self-patting is more noise than strategy, and gives an inkling of how NDA2 may also end up like NDA1’s “India Shining”, when the overall GDP growth hovered around 8 per cent but agriculture performed poorly at about 2.5 per cent. We all know the final result — how NDA1 was voted out of power in 2004.

Nevertheless, India’s overall GDP growth is still inspiring for FY16, between 7-7.5 per cent. But if this growth is to translate into significant poverty reduction, one must ask how agriculture is faring since most of the poor are in or around agriculture, engaging almost half of India’s workforce and supporting roughly 60 per cent of its population.

And the news from the agri-front is not good. Last year, with a rainfall deficit of 12 per cent, agri-GDP grew by only 0.2 per cent (basic prices). This year, the rain deficit is bigger (-14 per cent), and it’s back-to-back drought with much lower water in reservoirs. Reports from drought-affected states suggest significant losses in agriculture. For example, in Madhya Pradesh alone, the soya crop is likely to be down by more than 40 per cent over last year. The situation is similar for other crops in Maharashtra, Karnataka, Odisha, etc. The likely results suggest that overall agri-growth could be negative, unless the government starts massaging data to keep up the economy’s morale! In any case, agri-growth in the first four years of the 12th Five Year Plan is likely to be below 1.5 per cent, against a target of 4 per cent. This reflects extreme neglect of “Bharat” by the urban policy elites of “India”. Will this neglect throw up another Sharad Joshi to rally the cause of Bharat? Only time will tell.

Those in pursuit of making India a manufacturing hub, a la China, must remember that all major countries with large populations, like the US or EU, as well as emerging economies like China and Indonesia, have been supporting their farmers through myriad policy tools — high output prices, low input prices, direct income support, or crop insurance. The OECD has developed indicators like producer support estimates (PSEs) to assess the levels of total support to farmers as a percentage of gross farm receipts.

India aspires to compete with China, but are our policymakers aware of how China produces more than double India’s foodgrain from an agricultural land smaller than India’s and with an average holding size half of India’s? One of the reasons behind China’s spectacular achievement on the agri-front is the level of support given to farmers.

China’s PSE level increased from 2 per cent in 1995-97 to 19 per cent in 2012-14. For Indonesia, the PSE has gone up from 4 per cent to 21 per cent over the same period. There are no PSEs available for India, but subsidies on major inputs like fertilisers, power, irrigation, and agri-credit — the main policy instruments through which  the government supports farmers — hover between 6-8 per cent of the value of agri-output (2012-14). This is way below what a Chinese or Indonesian farmer gets. Even on the output price front, Indian farmers get much lower MSPs compared to their counterparts in Pakistan and China. In Pakistan, the MSP for wheat is $320/ MT and in China, $385/ MT, against India’s $226/ MT.

The Chinese government has realised the limitations of using pricing policy to provide inputs at cheaper rates. It has begun making direct payments for input subsidies to farmers at a flat rate per unit of land. Overtime, aggregate amount of transfer has increased from 12 billion yuan in 2006 to 107.1 billion yuan in 2014 (about $17bn). The government has also increased the coverage under crop insurance to 73 million yuan per hectare (45 per cent of total planted area in 2013) by providing premium subsidy of 80 per cent.

There are two important lessons here for India: One, if India wants to feed its people well, it has to almost double (if not triple) its support  to farmers, from current levels of about 6-8 per cent of the value of agri-output; two, it should move from price policy support to income support directly on per hectare basis. More like a DBT. Can India make this bold move? The chances are dim, as there’s no champion of agriculture in the Modi government. Unless the PM himself realises the need for this and acts fast, the condition of Indian peasants isn’t going to improve. The current set of elitist policies may not deliver for the poor, and they may hit back through the ballot when their time comes.

Gulati is Infosys chair professor for agriculture and Terway a research assistant at Icrier 

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. A
    Anupam
    Nov 11, 2015 at 9:56 am
    Anyone can see that agriculture is highly subsidised even in developed economies. US is amongst the highest subsidy providers to its farmers. The government of India and specially the PM needs to realise that there is no economic prosperity without food security. An army marches on its stomach, and it is all the more relevant for an economy. What good is a billion dollar investment when there isn't anything to eat.
    Reply
    1. K
      Khushminder
      Nov 10, 2015 at 10:38 am
      Modi jee Make in India might help Adani or Ambanis but without farmers produce you will be doomed.
      Reply
      1. K
        K SHESHU
        Nov 10, 2015 at 12:57 pm
        When we are looking over our heads for industrial growth and boasting of 'ever increasing' growth percentage, where is the scope looking downwards at the 'mother earth' on which our daily life depends on? Sixty percent of agriculturists cannot match ten percent of industrialists and another ten percent politicians! Import foodgrains and export industrial goods! 'Theory of surplus value' at its best!!
        Reply
        1. A
          Anurag Dhyani
          Nov 11, 2015 at 6:56 am
          And I wonders what would happen next month at WTO's meet where the fate of hundreds of millions of farmers and the path of Indian agriculture would be charted out. Successive governments have only shown their laggardness with regard to agriculture and the present government's approach has also been rhetoric, at best. One needs to understand that simply emulating other's success story over here and neglecting even the very basic sectors would do no good.
          Reply
          1. S
            SK
            Nov 10, 2015 at 10:08 am
            Agree with MK Vyas that the farmers don't pay income tax, free water, free electricity help when things go wrong. What else they need, Maharashtra congress wrote their loans off to win the election but did it help. The real reason is inefficient farming. Most of the farmers have 2-3 acres of land what can they do. All the taxpayers money go to the drain and only politicians get the benefit. We need to have large farms without the government help. Only those people should do the farming who can survive. With 2-3 acre land all the UP and Bihar farmers go to Delhi and Mumbai , sleep on foot path and do menial labor and still make more money. We need a good debate on farming and our policy.
            Reply
            1. I
              indian
              Nov 10, 2015 at 6:08 pm
              The author is right - the govt needs to focus on agri reforms on an urgent basis
              Reply
              1. K
                Kirit
                Nov 10, 2015 at 10:58 pm
                Best reform will be reducing number of people dependent on agriculture. It can only occur if India open up its market for new businesses and jobs are available in nearby town to all people and people are off agriculture. India should not have more 15% people relying on agriculture. Today's situation is legacy of socialism which did not allow private business and at the same time , inability of the government to provide jobs to these people.
                Reply
                1. K
                  KK Singh
                  Nov 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
                  There has been Policy Paralysis in the Agri. Sector, during the successive Union Governments in India, after the period of Green Revolution. No worthwhile systematic studies have been made to analyse the distress and plight of Indian Farmers. Also no serious studies have been done to analyse cause of such a low share of agriculture production in the GDP and GSDP. Successive Governments have been reacting on ad-hoc basis only that also during election times. The establishment has been giving only lip service and that is why there is a dearth of Agri.-Economists in India. People like Dr Gulati are very few, who has been raising concerns for this sector at various platforms. But his studies and concerns were not reaching to the ruling cl. One of the reasons for neglect of this sector is that farmers are though large in no. in India, but they are not an organised lot and not having Chambers and ociations like FICCI and OCHAM to lobby and fight for their causes. Though, in a sense they are also manufacturers, but they get drubbing from other manufactures and consumers as well. Even Traders of Agriculture Commodities do not come to their rescue. Meanwhile, India, neigh, Bharat is suffering. It will be interesting to see how the present ruling cl reacts to this study of Dr Gulati and how they do some serious thinking for this sector. Even some committees are set up for the purpose by the Government then also, it will be in the right direction. This will give enough ammunitions to Indian Negotiators at WTO talk, will hopefully increase the Agri. Sector Growth( which in turn will increase the GDP Growth as well) and will be in right direction to ameliorate the Indian Farmers from their distress and plight( which will then fetch votes as well). This is win-win situation, yet, will any body listen?
                  Reply
                  1. A
                    ashok
                    Nov 10, 2015 at 12:03 pm
                    How will these suggesions be funded at a time of fiscal stress ? Leaves, not money, grow on trees.
                    Reply
                    1. M
                      Mann
                      Nov 10, 2015 at 10:56 am
                      Sir I read your articles regularly and agree with your analysis and policy suggestions. My small request to you is to put these things directly to the prime minister if you haven't done that already. Only a strong representation from learned people like you may shake the government out of its slumber. I believe our PM is a doer and his heart beats for the poor. If his ministers are not thinking in thr correct direction,Mr. PM should put his foot down. There is not much time to lose.
                      Reply
                      1. N
                        Nagar Iyer
                        Nov 10, 2015 at 7:53 am
                        Do not use big jargons like 'GDP', 'PSE' & 'OECD' - The only way to help farmers in India is to ban CHEMICAL FARMING totally & make ORGANIC NATURAL FARMING mandatory. - Banning CHEMICAL FARMING will affect the FERTILIZER LOBBY which is a big mafia This mafia will resist all attempts to ban CHEMICAL FARMING because they are looting 14 lakh crores annually from our poor farmers to destroy soil fertility & spread poison - Implementation of NATURAL ORGANIC FARMING requires ban on slaughter of DESI COWS & DESI BULLS because they give the most valuable natural fertilizers & pesticides free of cost But there is MEAT MAFIA LOBBY too which will resist attempts to ban slaughter of cows & bulls. - ONLY A GOVERNMENT WHICH IS BOLD ENOUGH & STRONG ENOUGH TO OVERCOME THE FERTILIZER LOBBY & MEAT MAFIA LOBBY CAN SAVE THE FARMERS & OUR HEALTH IT MAY TAKE ANOTHER 500 YEARS
                        Reply
                        1. M
                          MK Vyas
                          Nov 10, 2015 at 8:36 am
                          Farmers don't pay I tax, don't pay for electricity, get subsidy for fertilizer, don't pay for water, get compensation if crop is damaged due to any reason. There is a minimum support price. What more needs to done? And why the prices are not compared with Canada for example? And what happens to domestic prices if support price is USD 350 per ton. We have seen this for daal. China is able to support farmers more because they have huge industrial income. From where we will get money.
                          Reply
                          1. P
                            preet
                            Nov 10, 2015 at 1:11 pm
                            Then the government should ensure that it can provide affordable organic fertilizer to the farmers. Organic fertilizer does not come only from cows and bulls. It comes from organic waste also. Dont bring meat into picture. And big jargons are used because thats how the world economists think. Not the agriculture wing of RSS.
                            Reply
                            1. P
                              preet
                              Nov 10, 2015 at 1:08 pm
                              if they dont get all this...you wont get your food.
                              Reply
                              1. R
                                R Shetty
                                Nov 10, 2015 at 2:07 pm
                                The only way out is to reduce the number of people depending on agriculture and improve the productivity of agriculture through technology and partnerships. This can be done over time by rural education, providing jobs to rural youths with other sectors and expanding per capita farm holdings. Good policy support as suggested by the authors can only be a short term solution; but longer term strategy for providing jobs for rural youths through other sectors and linking farmers to markets is the way forward.....
                                Reply
                                1. S
                                  SP
                                  Nov 10, 2015 at 2:21 pm
                                  While I respect the expert opinion of author, I venture to suggest an alternate approach, Why not Government offer to be an investor in agriculture using a public sector company - here government takes care of all input costs and farmer essentially manages the farm and delivers an output to Government - thereby de-risking him from any financial liabilities. Farmer will get paid for his value addition and a retainer income, in case of crop failures. Government gets to decide the inputs and crop mix and even may advise on methods.Even labour can be folded under NREGA all year around by spreading them between farms and infra projects.
                                  Reply
                                  1. G
                                    Gary Bagha
                                    Nov 10, 2015 at 11:28 am
                                    This comment is absolutely nonsense. Calculate cost of production, fertilizer, pesticides, seeds, Labour including family members hours, farming is always profession. We did seed production for Tri area, still in loss. We changed to mango,Guava orchards and eucalyptus plantation. Little relief. With current prices and lack of support from govt, farmers will always be I debt. Farmers are only paid about 60% the cost of their produce like wheat. Just calculate the cost of production. This is a thankless profession, unfortunately uneducated farmers have no choice, so they stick to it. Fortunately we got out.
                                    Reply
                                    1. Load More Comments