But will a nodal ministry at the Centre solve all issues in a federal structure such as ours?
In its determination to politically destroy Indira Gandhi, the party succeeded in hastening her return to power.
Rajasthan government’s decision to ‘target’ free medicines and diagnostics is contrary to the recommended role of government in healthcare
Leading a protest movement that has been messy, inchoate and inconclusive, the 61-year-old is seen as having disastrously overreached.
Compare the flattering treatment, the softball questions, to the interview that Rahul faced.
We have been awaiting this moment ever since Rahul Gandhi faced the nation. In other words, he found himself staring at Arnab Goswami (Times Now) — it’s one and the same thing. After a hard-hitting session, the verdict was clear: Rahul had taken tough questioning without flinching under fire — but bored viewers with his repetitive answers to many questions on empowering women, the youth and changing the system.
We wondered then, whether and when Narendra Modi would allow himself to come face to face with Goswami or any other news anchor and whether TV anchors would give him as torrid a time as they had given Rahul. When it happened earlier this week, it came as welcome sign that Modi was prepared to be at least questioned on TV, something he has shied away from thus far. And yet, none of us could have predicted that when he finally gave a TV interview, it would be to a regional news channel — ETV Rajasthan —
and another to one of his more recent admirers, Madhu Kishwar.
The latter, broadcast in a series of excerpts from a long session with Kishwar for her book, Modi, Muslims and Media, showed up on News X. Over the last few days, Decoding Modi has brought us face to face with the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate. That’s the kind of interview it was: Modi in full frontal with Madhu Kishwar invisible but for the occasional “Hmmm”. Modi’s monologue — because that is what it was — was accompanied by matching visuals. So if he was describing his elevation to chief minister of Gujarat, there were stills/ footage of him being sworn in. If he was speaking about Godhra, we saw him emerge from the burning train, etc.
The interview was not much of an interview. It looked more like a documenting Modi rather than decoding him — given that it was part of Kishwar’s research. We seldom heard Kishwar’s questions — the entire focus was on Modi. And how he reveled in it, recounting anecdotes about his life and times as chief minister of Gujarat. The exercise was desultory and allowed him to say just what he pleased.
In the other one on ETV Rajasthan, we saw and heard the anchor. Saw him ask each questions with his mouth and his hands. He couldn’t control them as they sketched circles in front of his face. Modi sat opposite him, perfectly still. And why not? He was asked leading questions, allowing him to expand on his vision for the future of India. Didn’t hear even one tough question. So Modi had the time of his life, repeating much of what he says in his election rally speeches — the Gujarat model, for instance, came up for a long explanation and how the Chinese had come to admire it. He was the master of the generalised statement: for instance, while speaking on defence production, he airily commented, “Can’t the continued…